Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Can some check if my spag is right please? Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    Hi,

    I'm retaking a English test and I've been self teaching so I was hoping if someone could tell me if my sentence is okay and I'm experimenting with my vocabulary so please let me know if I'm using any of them in the wrong context.

    Okay, sorry I didn't realise it would be an issue .
    1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.

    A quick reply would Be nice my exam is tomorrow.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    Anyone?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    Anyone?
    No-one's going to correct it off a photograph. Go to the trouble of typing it in and I'll do it from the text I'll then be able to quote.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Why all the hate towards Natural Selection.
    • Very Important Poster
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I actually thought you were going to ask us to rate your spaghetti bolognese :lol:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cambio wechsel)
    No-one's going to correct it off a photograph. Go to the trouble of typing it in and I'll do it from the text I'll then be able to quote.
    Okay, sorry I didn't realise it would be an issue .

    1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by UWS)
    I actually thought you were going to ask us to rate your spaghetti bolognese :lol:
    Lol no. Just my writing
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mistletoe)
    Why all the hate towards Natural Selection.
    To make my sentences are interesting? If you really want to know, I'm learning about epigentics in biology which in a way provides an argument against natural selection
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    x

    1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

    We extol a quality not a person. The vicar extolled the importance of self-restraint.

    Better here would be 'praised'.

    Your grammar is defintely nonstandard* and is excessively fussy. Sophie praised her toddler Sam for painting her a lovely picture.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    Replace the hyphen with a comma to create a dependent clause. Or shift that to the front of the sentence, ie. As convincing as it may seem,...

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    I feel that 'avarice' must be the wrong word here.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.

    Why demand of the husband? The husband's every demand. Again, what do you think that hyphen is doing, again attached to the preceding word? The semi-colon here should be a comma.


    *For most purposes a person could write his whole life without having need of the hyphen or semi-colon that you seem to see as needed.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    Okay, sorry I didn't realise it would be an issue .

    1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.
    Only 3 seems weird to me. I'd write it:
    3. "The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice"; this is not true so it must be fabricated.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by cambio wechsel)
    1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

    We extol a quality not a person. The vicar extolled the importance of self-restraint.

    Better here would be 'praised'.

    Your grammar is defintely nonstandard* and is excessively fussy. Sophie praised her toddler Sam for painting her a lovely picture.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    Replace the hyphen with a comma to create a dependent clause. Or shift that to the front of the sentence, ie. As convincing as it may seem,...

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    I feel that 'avarice' must be the wrong word here.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.

    Why demand of the husband? The husband's every demand. Again, what do you think that hyphen is doing, again attached to the preceding word? The semi-colon here should be a comma.


    *For most purposes a person could write his whole life without having need of the hyphen or semi-colon that you seem to see as needed.
    Thanks for marking it, yep I also felt avarice was not the right word. I'll change them.
    The purpose of that exercise was to use a hyphen or semi colon.
    Obviously I didn't use them correctly. I'll try it again...
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    Okay, sorry I didn't realise it would be an issue .

    1. Sophie extolled Sam, her toddler, who had painted her a lovely picture.

    You could do this one or two other ways but in the original the semi-colon is quite odd and the dash is just wrong.

    2. The entire concept of 'natural selection', as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

    Stop putting random dashes everywhere. A simple comma works much better here.

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    I don't really understand what you mean here, so I'd suggest rephrasing entirely, and preferably doing so in more than one sentence.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to: no matter how ludicrous, she faithfully acquiesced.

    It shows that you're really trying to force semi-colons into your writing. It would be more impressive if you used them less, but only where appropriate.
    In general your writing would be much more fluent if you kept it simpler.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    I understand what everyone's I saying but I need to include and effectively use a range of punctuation. I can't just limit myself to a comma and a full stop.

    1. The teacher, who was naturally circumspect in his descision, gave James a well deserved B.

    2. James took umbrage at that grade; he felt he deserves a better grade.

    Is this better?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    1. Sophie extolled her toddler, Sam: he had painted her a lovely picture.

    You should use a colon, not a semi-colon here, because you replace it with "because" or similar conjunction.

    2. Either:

    The entire concept of 'natural selection', as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a fabrication.

    Or:

    The entire concept of 'natural selection', as convincing as it may seem, is a mere fabrication.

    Nothing more and mere are redundant. You could replace the commas with em rules.

    3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

    This doesn't make sense but it's grammatically OK.

    4. Every demand of the husband was tended to; no matter how ludicrous it was, she faithfully acquiesced.

    Although I don't think you would tend to a demand. Perhaps "obeyed" is better.

    I don't know what your dashes are doing - get rid of all of them.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    Okay, so it's safe to say, I should stay the hell away from dashes in my exam tomorrow.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    Okay, so it's safe to say, I should stay the hell away from dashes in my exam tomorrow.
    No don't do that, just use them when they are necessary.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mistletoe)
    No don't do that, just use them when they are necessary.
    Like when you add additional information that it related. Yep, I tried that, with Sarah's toddler.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
    Like when you add additional information that it related. Yep, I tried that, with Sarah's toddler.
    You don't want to drastically change how you write just before an exam or it will all come out weird. Just stick to what you know. TSR is hypercritical.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    You never need dashes as you can always replace them with commas, colons, or brackets. But they're not wrong if you know what you're doing.
    • Offline

      20
      (Original post by Onthedancefloor)
      Hi,

      I'm retaking a English test and I've been self teaching so I was hoping if someone could tell me if my sentence is okay and I'm experimenting with my vocabulary so please let me know if I'm using any of them in the wrong context.

      Okay, sorry I didn't realise it would be an issue .
      1. Sophie extolled Sam- her toddler; he had painted her a lovely picture.

      2. The entire concept of 'natural selection'- as convincing as it may seem, is nothing more than a mere fabrication.

      3. The entire concept of natural selection is fueled by avarice; this is not true so it must be fabricated.

      4. Every demand of the husband was tended to- no matter how ludicrous; she faithfully acquiesced.

      A quick reply would Be nice my exam is tomorrow.
      Only your use of the word "fabricate" is actually in-place here. "Extol" is a word which isn't used any more, and "acquiesce" means to accept something, not to comply with a demand.
     
     
     
  1. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  2. Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    OMAM

    Ultimate Of Mice And Men Thread

    Plot, context, character analysis and everything in between.

    Notes

    Revision Hub

    All our revision materials in one place

    Love books

    Common grammar and vocabulary problems

    Get your questions asked and answered

    Useful literary websitesStudy help rules and posting guidelines

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  3. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  4. The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.