Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    if you take x^2 and rotate it 90 degrees clockwise so you have a sideways quadratic and then shift it to the left two units so it crosses the x axis at -2 and you went onto intergrate between -2 and 0 would you be finding the area above the x axis or below it.

    If you took this graph and moved it up abit so there was more area above the x axis and did the intergral from where it crosses the axis to 0, would you be finding the area bounded by the lines x=(where it crosses) and x=0 and the graph above the axis or the entire area of the graph above the axis.

    Also, if it does give you the area above, how would you find the area below? I know you should integrate with respect to y but can you find it by intergrating with respect to x?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I think it'd have to be d/dy since rotating x^2 by 90° gives y^2
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    the function you have described cannot be integrated with respect to x because it is one to many.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    the function you have described cannot be integrated with respect to x because it is one to many.
    Thanks,
    what do you mean by one to many?
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Thanks,
    what do you mean by one to many?
    http://images.slideplayer.com/11/303...s/slide_20.jpg
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Oh, in the question it gave parametric equations. In the solution it started off by saying:

    2 times intergral of y with respect to x. We were not given y in terms of x so had to intergrate para metrically in one direction then times by 2.

    So would the first part be incorrect then (2times intergral of y with respect to x)

    This is for the sideways quadratic crossing at -2.
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Oh, in the question it gave parametric equations. In the solution it started off by saying:

    2 times intergral of y with respect to x. We were not given y in terms of x so had to intergrate para metrically in one direction then times by 2.

    So would the first part be incorrect then (2times intergral of y with respect to x)

    This is for the sideways quadratic crossing at -2.
    perhaps you could post the question for us ?

    :holmes:
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    here it is:
    http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...hapter%202.pdf

    page 64 Excercise E question 8 part c
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    here it is:
    http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...hapter%202.pdf

    page 64 Excercise E question 8 part c
    Okay so you need to calculate the finite area on the left of the y-axis. When you are integrating \displaystyle \int_{-2}^0 y.dx you are finding the area above the x-axis because the curve is y^2=x+2 (without checking) so taking square roots of both sides gives y=\sqrt{x+2} which is only the branch above the x-axis (as y\geq0 for this function)

    The reason for 2 lots of it is due to symmetry and how the area above is the same as the area below.

    To find the area below simply say you're integrating -y instead.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Okay so you need to calculate the finite area on the left of the y-axis. When you are integrating \displaystyle \int_{-2}^0 y.dx you are finding the area above the x-axis because the curve is y^2=x+2 (without checking) so taking square roots of both sides gives y=\sqrt{x+2} which is only the branch above the x-axis (as y\geq0 for this function)

    The reason for 2 lots of it is due to symmetry and how the area above is the same as the area below.

    To find the area below simply say you're integrating -y instead.
    but how do you know y=+vert(x+2)
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    but how do you know y=+vert(x+2)
    vert? I assume you meant sqrt??

    Well y=\pm \sqrt{x+2} so it's EITHER + or - but it cannot be both at the same time (unless you want to jump to piecewise functions with are not needed here), so you need to consider each branch individually.

    For y=-\sqrt{x+2} that's what I was talking about when I told you how to calculate the area below the x-axis with -y if you take y=+\sqrt{x+2} initially
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    vert? I assume you meant sqrt??

    Well y=\pm \sqrt{x+2} so it's EITHER + or - but it cannot be both at the same time (unless you want to jump to piecewise functions with are not needed here), so you need to consider each branch individually.

    For y=-\sqrt{x+2} that's what I was talking about when I told you how to calculate the area below the x-axis with -y if you take y=+\sqrt{x+2} initially
    Thanks, so how did they know that intergral was going to be positive?
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Thanks, so how did they know that intergral was going to be positive?
    They didnt "know" per se, but rather just chose the + because it is more intuitive, makes more sense, and makes up for less confusing answers.

    If they had chosen y=-\sqrt{x+2} then obviously integrating would give negative area so the answer sheet would say something like \displaystyle -2\int_{-2}^0 y.dx instead.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    They didnt "know" per se, but rather just chose the + because it is more intuitive, makes more sense, and makes up for less confusing answers.

    If they had chosen y=-\sqrt{x+2} then obviously integrating would give negative area so the answer sheet would say something like \displaystyle -2\int_{-2}^0 y.dx instead.
    Thanks very much
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.