Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Hi,
    I was doing the question:
    Find the equation of the normal to the curve with parametric equations x=e^t y=e^t +e^-t where t=0

    so i had no problem finding dy/dx by the chain rule and then getting the gradient of the tangent to be 0.

    the first problem was not being able to use-1/m where m is the gradient to find the gradient of the normal and just having to recognise that its 1... so is it true that the rule goes out the window in this case.

    Secondly, when finding the equation is it true you cant use y-y1=m(x-x1) in this case (only if you were asked to find the equation of the tangent and the gradient is 0) and instead find the x co-ordinate at t=0 as you know it is going to be of the form x=t. (where t in this case is 1)

    Is this the case or am i missing something?
    Thanks
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Hi,
    I was doing the question:
    Find the equation of the normal to the curve with parametric equations x=e^t y=e^t +e^-t where t=0

    so i had no problem finding dy/dx by the chain rule and then getting the gradient of the tangent to be 0.

    the first problem was not being able to use-1/m where m is the gradient to find the gradient of the normal and just having to recognise that its 1... so is it true that the rule goes out the window in this case.

    Secondly, when finding the equation is it true you cant use y-y1=m(x-x1) in this case (only if you were asked to find the equation of the tangent and the gradient is 0) and instead find the x co-ordinate at t=0 as you know it is going to be of the form x=t. (where t in this case is 1)

    Is this the case or am i missing something?
    Thanks
    You cannot use the negative reciprocal if your gradient is 0 - a slightly different way of thinking is required.

    At t=0 you have the point (1,2).

    Since the gradient at that point is 0 then that means the tangent is of the form y=k (which you can find quite simply if you apply y-y_1=m(x-x_1) ) so the normal must be of the form x=m where m,n are constants and the point where the two lines intersect gives (1,2). So what must the normal be if y and x are not dependent on each other??
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.