Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Hi
    i understand why they simplfied the equation and then differentiated each term with respect to x. But, i did the started by differentiating x with respect to x to get 1. And then on the left hand side used the qoutient rule to differentiate that fraction term with respect to x. it didnt reduce to the same answer.

    Am i doing the quotient rule wrong or can i not do it this way.
    Thanks for your help:

    Question:
    http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...hapter%204.pdf

    excercise b question 1f

    Thanks for your help
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Nothing intrinsically wrong with doing it your way. I would expect you to end up with a fairly complex expressions , however and then simplifying it will NOT be fun.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    Nothing intrinsically wrong with doing it your way. I would expect you to end up with a fairly complex expressions , however and then simplifying it will NOT be fun.
    Oh ok, it should simplify to the same expression though shouldn't it? i cant get that to happen.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Oh ok, it should simplify to the same expression though shouldn't it? i cant get that to happen.
    If you differentiated the quotient properly with respect to x and with respect to y, it should
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    If you differentiated the quotient properly with respect to x and with respect to y, it should
    I think i did.. but clearly i didnt
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    I think i did.. but clearly i didnt
    Can I see your working?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Can I see your working?
    i dont have a way of uploading it . But i think the problem lies with my quotient rule as i equated the fraction they give as the answer and my answer and it doesn't cancel...

    This is how i set up the quotient rule:

    1=2timesdy/dx(x^2-y)-2y(2x-dy/dx)(all over)(x^2-y)^2
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Oh ok, it should simplify to the same expression though shouldn't it? i cant get that to happen.
    One thing that you sometimes need to do is use the original expression (that you were differentiating).

    In this case, assuming you diffed the fraction correctly, you've now got some expression with  (x^2-y)^2 as the denominator.

    You can use the original equation to replace x^2-y)^2 with something a bit less unpleasant to work with. (No idea how much it will help, but I think it will).
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    i dont have a way of uploading it . But i think the problem lies with my quotient rule as i equated the fraction they give as the answer and my answer and it doesn't cancel...

    This is how i set up the quotient rule:

    1=2timesdy/dx(x^2-y)-2y(2x-dy/dx)(all over)(x^2-y)^2
    You'd need to a lot of substituting to get to the fraction they've given but if you try numerical values, you'll see that you get the same gradient value using their fraction and yours, if you've done it correctly
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    You'd need to a lot of substituting to get to the fraction they've given but if you try numerical values, you'll see that you get the same gradient value using their fraction and yours, if you've done it correctly
    Thanks for your help
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 111davey1)
    Thanks for your help
    Just multiply both sides by the denominator

    Name:  Capture.PNG
Views: 25
Size:  3.8 KB

    expand and rearrange, you get a nice expression like that, then just implicitly differentiate like all of the other ones on the sheet before that.

    no need to dive into a quotient here.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    I was doing that exercise on friday and I just multiplied the whole equation by x^2 - y to get an equation of x^3 - xy - 2y = 0. It's much simpler that way.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.