Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    I've been set this homework on algebraic proof but am unsure if I'm doing it right. Would I need to write a statement to prove:
    (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8 ?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by molly_123c)
    I've been set this homework on algebraic proof but am unsure if I'm doing it right. Would I need to write a statement to prove:
    (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8 ?
    You'd need to write the proposition statement to start, if that's what you mean
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    You'd need to write the proposition statement to start, if that's what you mean
    So what would I say at the start?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Something like" Proposition:  (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8, also maybe with f(x)=(n+4)^2 - (3n+4) and g(x)=(n+1)(n+4)+8 "

    Then prove it by induction
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Something like" Proposition:  (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8, also maybe with f(x)=(n+4)^2 - (3n+4) and g(x)=(n+1)(n+4)+8 "

    Then prove it by induction
    Okay thank you, I'll do that
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    You should also probably say where  n \in \mathbb{N}
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by molly_123c)
    I've been set this homework on algebraic proof but am unsure if I'm doing it right. Would I need to write a statement to prove:
    (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8 ?
    All you need to do is expand the LHS and manipulate it enough to get the RHS.

    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Something like" Proposition:  (n+4)^2 - (3n+4) = (n+1)(n+4)+8, also maybe with f(x)=(n+4)^2 - (3n+4) and g(x)=(n+1)(n+4)+8 "

    Then prove it by induction
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    You should also probably say where  n \in \mathbb{N}
    Functions of x without any variables of x in them?? Also this statement is true \forall n \in \mathbb{R} not just the set \mathbb{N}

    Furthermore, this is GCSE level. Proof by induction is not covered at this level.

    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    All you need to do is expand the LHS and manipulate it enough to get the RHS.





    Functions of x without any variables of x in them?? Also this statement is true \forall n \in \mathbb{R} not just the set \mathbb{N}

    Furthermore, this is GCSE level. Proof by induction is not covered at this level.

    Lol, I'm just to writing f(x) and g(x).
    In the course notes I've seen, it always specifies natural numbers in the completion step, so that's kind of my default

    I remember a question like this at GCSE but I didn't answer it. How do you prove it without induction?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    My bad for not seeing this was in the GCSE's section, but OP, why didn't you say anything if you don't use proof by induction?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by h3rmit)
    Lol, I'm just to writing f(x) and g(x).
    In the course notes I've seen, it always specifies natural numbers in the completion step, so that's kind of my default

    I remember a question like this at GCSE but I didn't answer it. How do you prove it without induction?
    Induction is not needed whatsoever.

    As I told OP, you simply expand the LHS and manipulate it to get the RHS.

    A key step many might find tricky to think of is to split the constant once you achieve the form n^2+bn+c on the LHS.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    Induction is not needed whatsoever.

    As I told OP, you simply expand the LHS and manipulate it to get the RHS.

    A key step many might find tricky to think of is to split the constant once you achieve the form n^2+bn+c on the LHS.
    Okay, thank you I'll try that: so am I just trying to make it quadratic and then solve it from that form?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by molly_123c)
    Okay, thank you I'll try that: so am I just trying to make it quadratic and then solve it from that form?
    Yes get an expanded quadratic then try to achieve the answer from there onwards by noticing that the answer want a (n+1)(n+4) in your answer, and that expands to n^2+5n+4 meaning thats what you want a part of your manipulated quadratic to be.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: February 3, 2017

University open days

  • University of Bradford
    All faculties Undergraduate
    Wed, 21 Nov '18
  • Buckinghamshire New University
    All Faculties Postgraduate
    Wed, 21 Nov '18
  • Heriot-Watt University
    All Schools Postgraduate
    Wed, 21 Nov '18
Poll
Black Friday: Yay or Nay?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Equations

Best calculators for A level Maths

Tips on which model to get

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.