Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Edit: Sorry, wrong thread
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    I note that the cost was more than NASA's budget. But you don't need to be a rocket scientist to work out that this whole policy was insane from the outset.

    Merkel will go down in history as the Chancellor who destroyed the EU, but it is in Germany where her legacy will last longest. Generations yet unborn will curse her memory as they wrestle with the social problems her decisions over the past couple of years created for her country.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Is that it
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    Do you think there might be demographic benefits for Germany in the longer run? Given that Germany's demographic outlook was so dire prior to the immigration surge.

    Also do you have robust evidence to support your scepticism about the employment levels and tax contributions of migrants.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Germany is responsible for Germany's policy on refugees; the United Kingdom is responsible for the United Kingdom's policy on refugees.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    It's disgusting, to be honest. 21.7 billion Euros that could have been spent strengthening the military or creating jobs for natives.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    and whose children won't become a threat to German society.
    Seems a bit right-wing for you lol

    To address the actual topic though, yes it's a big financial drain on Germany, especially since most aren't working. Does beg the question though of whether we should measure the value of saving lives monetarily, and I'd argue that saving lives is worth more than the money spent doing so. That does not, however, mean I support Merkel's insane migrant policy, that has no real way of verifying who is or is not a genuine refugee. Even among refugees, the process needs to include a strong screening process to keep dangerous elements out. But alas, that's too late for Germany (and Sweden) now. It would be better to provide humanitarian aid to the surrounding countries, where they would culturally fit in far better. I would actually argue too that many refugees won't go back - why would they? They can have greater wealth and security in Germany, with things like better education for their children and not living under a corrupt government in a region that always has conflicts in some form or another. If this is the case, then it actually has dangerous demographic consequences for Germany's future due to a large majority of the migrants being male. This will skew Germany's gender balance, and studies have shown that societies with higher proportions of males have higher rates of violence (this isn't some regressive left attack on males btw lol, I'm just quoting studies), not to mention shortages of things like marriage partners, so make of that what you will. Oh and yes, permanent 'cultural enrichment' sounds fun for the Germans too.
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Trapz99)
    Germany is responsible for Germany's policy on refugees; the United Kingdom is responsible for the United Kingdom's policy on refugees.
    Actually the EU is responsible for Germany's policy on refugees.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Obligatory: Was this money well spent? What do you guys think?
    The costs spent on intergrating the refugees are very important as it helps them to find a new job. Which in return is good for Germany as ,if they get more working refugees, then they get more manpower of their economy.
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by apt9)
    Do you think there might be demographic benefits for Germany in the longer run? Given that Germany's demographic outlook was so dire prior to the immigration surge.

    Also do you have robust evidence to support your scepticism about the employment levels and tax contributions of migrants.
    You assume they'll socially integrate with ease, they'll be able to get an education (of good quality since the system will be strained) and that they won't have external costs to the economy… with those assumptions you're right.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zayn008)
    Might I also add, the last time the German population surged It kind of caused a world war.
    So what if the German population surged by the time of a world war (I am assuming you are talking about world war 2). Just because that the population surged by world war 2 doesn't mean that it necessarily played any factor in causing world war 2. World War 2 was caused because of entirely other reasons other than population and it would have happen with or without the population surge.

    Correlation is not causation.

    Anyways... my other post was only assuming if the refugees would actually use the intergration programs. Unfortunately some won't be able to or be bothered.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    1) The refugees are meant to return home.
    2) Very few refugees get jobs
    3) The economy relies more on high-skilled jobs. Automation will deal with low-skilled jobs faster than the refugees will integrate.
    Fair enough, but it will be a very long time until refugees will be able to return home.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Yes, it will be. But the official line is that they are only temporary. Like the "guest workers" I guess who are still in Germany..
    I wonder how the German administration will even go about getting a million people to travel back to their country of origin. It's going to be pretty difficult to track everyone down, especially if some of them don't want to be found. And if many of them do have jobs at this point, it might even be economically damaging (at least in the short term).
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    That's assuming they even know their country of origin. Can't exactly deport someone if you don't know from whence came....
    lol that's true

    They shouldn't have let anyone through who didn't have official ID with them, like a passport. If people don't bring one along, it's pretty indicative that they have something to hide imo
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: January 30, 2017
Poll
Black Friday: Yay or Nay?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.