You are Here: Home >< Maths

FP3 Tangents and Normals to Ellipses watch

1. In the Edexcel textbook, when you are asked to find the equation of a tangent/normal to an ellipse, the answers in the back use formulae that isn't in the formula booklet. They have been proven in the examples before the exercises. Is this suggesting that these formulae ought to be memorised in the exam or are you only credited for fully working out the first derivative and using y-y1=m(x-x1)?

Similarly, they prove a condition that must be satisfied for a line to be tangent to an ellipse. Is this meant to be memorised also?
2. (Original post by BasicMistake)
In the Edexcel textbook, when you are asked to find the equation of a tangent/normal to an ellipse, the answers in the back use formulae that isn't in the formula booklet. They have been proven in the examples before the exercises. Is this suggesting that these formulae ought to be memorised in the exam or are you only credited for fully working out the first derivative and using y-y1=m(x-x1)?

Similarly, they prove a condition that must be satisfied for a line to be tangent to an ellipse. Is this meant to be memorised also?
you mean things like the condition for a line being tangent to an eclipse being etc, if so then you can either learn them off (advised, as itll save you lots of time in the exams) or just derive them in the exam
3. (Original post by DylanJ42)
you mean things like the condition for a line being tangent to an eclipse being etc, if so then you can either learn them off (advised, as itll save you lots of time in the exams) or just derive them in the exam
Yes, that's the one.

The other two are:
Tangent

Normal

So you can just sub in values into these formulae and you'll still get full method marks in the exam?
4. (Original post by BasicMistake)
Yes, that's the one.

The other two are:
Tangent

Normal

So you can just sub in values into these formulae and you'll still get full method marks in the exam?
I just had a look at the book and I dont think you could quote that. However Id assume if you had to use it you would be asked to derive it in part (a), and then maybe apply it in a part b or something.
5. (Original post by DylanJ42)
I just had a look at the book and I dont think you could quote that. However Id assume if you had to use it you would be asked to derive it in part (a), and then maybe apply it in a part b or something.
Ah okay. Thanks for your help!

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: January 30, 2017
Today on TSR

Discuss upcoming interviews...

University open days

• Heriot-Watt University
School of Textiles and Design Undergraduate
Fri, 16 Nov '18
• University of Roehampton
Sat, 17 Nov '18
• Edge Hill University
Faculty of Health and Social Care Undergraduate
Sat, 17 Nov '18
Poll
Useful resources

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Chat with other maths applicants

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE