The Student Room Logo
University of Oxford, Pawel-Sytniewski
University of Oxford
Oxford

Oxford Graduate Application 2012/13

Scroll to see replies

Original post by smh30
Ps to the op - graduates often receive their college offers late - so don't worry. It doesn't mean you'll end up in a "less desirable college". I think I remember getting mine around July when I was accepted for my MSc there.



thank you :smile:
University of Oxford, Pawel-Sytniewski
University of Oxford
Oxford
Reply 3521
Original post by GabrielleT
Mmm try going to school in a snowstorm or when it's -35! (It happens all the time in Canada, especially in January or February, and we have snow until at least April.) Having dug in Greece at 40-45 degrees and experienced Canadian weather, I am looking forward the mild winter and the beautiful spring that the UK gets!!! It seems like a good middle-ground to me. But hey, maybe I am just too positive and I idealize Oxford too much! :wink:


The voice of gloom speaks up again: Oxford has its own slightly bizarre micro-climate, which I think comes from it being in a slight valley amidst a lot of rivers. From October through to February/March/April/May (in the case of this year - ugh!) it can be very damp, grey and overcast, but of course nowhere near as cold as Canada! :smile: This year has been a particularly bizarre one: we essentially seem to have missed spring and gone from wet, chilly, jumper-wearing weather a few days ago to wonderful sun-shine and summer-dress-wearing weather from yesterday onwards. :tongue: (But... Oxford is *stunning* in the sun).

Something which a friend from Austria once told me when she visited the UK was that the weather in England was much more changeable than that elsewhere; she found it really odd that it could be raining in the morning and sunny and hot in the afternoon. So be prepared for unpredictability, and bring a very flexible selection of clothes! :smile:
i'd like to know about the cleaning situation too
Original post by HoVis
The voice of gloom speaks up again: Oxford has its own slightly bizarre micro-climate, which I think comes from it being in a slight valley amidst a lot of rivers. From October through to February/March/April/May (in the case of this year - ugh!) it can be very damp, grey and overcast, but of course nowhere near as cold as Canada! :smile: This year has been a particularly bizarre one: we essentially seem to have missed spring and gone from wet, chilly, jumper-wearing weather a few days ago to wonderful sun-shine and summer-dress-wearing weather from yesterday onwards. :tongue: (But... Oxford is *stunning* in the sun).

Something which a friend from Austria once told me when she visited the UK was that the weather in England was much more changeable than that elsewhere; she found it really odd that it could be raining in the morning and sunny and hot in the afternoon. So be prepared for unpredictability, and bring a very flexible selection of clothes! :smile:


Thanks for the advice! Having lived in Bristol last year, I can concur with your Austrian friend: the schizophrenic weather is a surprise for foreigners! I'll definitely bear that in mind when packing! :wink: At least I won't have to bring my snowsuit, which is amazing!
Oh by the way, March applicants: I emailed Lincoln College yesterday to ask them if they thought they might make their decision before the application deadline for college scholarships, and the admissions officer emailed me back this morning to tell me to apply for the scholarships, as they just decided to offer me a place!
I am so happy!!!!

If anyone else applied to Lincoln from the March cohort, they are sending out official offers next week!
Reply 3525
Original post by WaSaDa
Yeah, you're right it's not just the UK that does this. Universities in all EU countries have to treat students from member states the same for fee purposes. For that reason lots of students from England are applying to the Republic of Ireland (and other countries) as they are treated as home students and pay lower fees than they would in the UK.


Although, a loophole in this law results in the somewhat bemusing fact that Scottish universities charge students from anywhere in the EU *other than England* the same price as their home students, but charge students from England much more, because they are allowed to treat students from a different 'region' of the same state (which is what England and Scotland seem to be in relation to one another in terms of EU law) differently. Bah. :tongue:

I can see why they do it to some extent - preventing loads of English students from crossing the border for a (much) cheaper education, trying to keep bright Scottish students in Scotland, and also probably as a tiny bit of a get-back for centuries of history in which England behaved atrociously towards them - but it is a tiny bit annoying.
Reply 3526
Original post by HoVis
Although, a loophole in this law results in the somewhat bemusing fact that Scottish universities charge students from anywhere in the EU *other than England* the same price as their home students, but charge students from England much more, because they are allowed to treat students from a different 'region' of the same state (which is what England and Scotland seem to be in relation to one another in terms of EU law) differently. Bah. :tongue:

I can see why they do it to some extent - preventing loads of English students from crossing the border for a (much) cheaper education, trying to keep bright Scottish students in Scotland, and also probably as a tiny bit of a get-back for centuries of history in which England behaved atrociously towards them - but it is a tiny bit annoying.
Yeah, I'd heard about it but maybe the best plan in that case is getting back onto the street in England to lower tuition fees there.
Reply 3527
Original post by WaSaDa
Yeah, I'd heard about it but maybe the best plan in that case is getting back onto the street in England to lower tuition fees there.


Hmm. To be honest - and I'll concede that I wasn't hit by the fees rise, so am probably not as bound up in this as many slightly younger students are - I don't actually oppose the rise in fees in the UK. Firstly, the system of repayments is very generous. No repayments unless you're earning above a certain amount, no interest beyond the rate of inflation, and the fact that the debt is written off if you haven't paid it after 30 years means that it is essentially a graduate tax, and those who benefit the most fiscally from a university education end up paying the most. I admit that the psychological impact of having what seems like a massive quantity hanging over you as a 'debt' can cause a problem, and Oxford, at least, is making efforts to prevent this from putting off students from lower income families (fees are means-tested here under the new system; something I also have a bit of an issue with, but I do think it is probably the best way to avoid putting off bright but poor students). The government loan for education is so much better here than it is in the States - fees are ridiculously high, the interest on loans is massive, and the debt can never be written off - not even if you declare bankrupt.

Secondly, I found some of the student 'protests' very frustrating and poorly thought out. A load of sixth-formers (and some university students) occupied the Radcliffe Camera, leading it to be closed at a time when some of my friends had coursework due -- they couldn't get to the books they needed. Compared to some of the protests in London which got out of hand, the protest was quite peaceful, but it caused frustration and annoyance to a group of people (older university students) who would before that have been very sympathetic to the cause.

I also found one of their chants, 'education is a right, not a privilege', very irritating. Higher education is a privilege, that you have to work for and prepare for. The increase in fees really doesn't affect anyone's ability to pay for university thanks to the student loan (which many students will never fully pay off before it gets written off, I'd wager), and beyond that the 'barriers' to access for higher education - such as academic ones - are important. If you took the '[higher] education is a right' to the extreme conclusion then universities would have to drop having set grade requirements for entry.

Finally, I feel that on the whole the immense noise over undergraduate fees distracted from another issue very dear to our hearts which was also affected by the decreases in government funding to universities - graduate funding. Unlike for undergraduate, it really isn't so easy to overcome financial barriers to go onto further study after BA.

Oh dear, sorry for the rant -- revision procrastination! :redface:

EDIT: I know this essentially makes my objection to the lower Scottish fees sound a bit silly. It's more the mild unfriendliness of the distinction that gets to me than the difference in cost. :tongue:
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 3528
This is pretty irrelevant to the current conversation but I just thought I would share my anger:

Went into NatWest bank to ask about getting a loan for my masters (modern languages) and they said "sorry, we only offer loans to postgraduate students studying sciences, not humanities"

Yes, thats right. The bank only help science students. Lovely eh??? Especially as science students are so much more likely to have sponsorship!

*RAGE*
Original post by ACC_21
This is pretty irrelevant to the current conversation but I just thought I would share my anger:

Went into NatWest bank to ask about getting a loan for my masters (modern languages) and they said "sorry, we only offer loans to postgraduate students studying sciences, not humanities"

Yes, thats right. The bank only help science students. Lovely eh??? Especially as science students are so much more likely to have sponsorship!

*RAGE*


Try Barclays and Co-op for a CDL.
Reply 3530
so weird if different banks fund some subjects and not others..... need some consistency! but thanks, will try... although I dont know how much luck I'll have getting a loan without any history at that bank
Original post by ACC_21
so weird if different banks fund some subjects and not others..... need some consistency! but thanks, will try... although I dont know how much luck I'll have getting a loan without any history at that bank


my bf had no history either and he got a CDL from co-op for classics.
Reply 3532
Original post by ACC_21
This is pretty irrelevant to the current conversation but I just thought I would share my anger:

Went into NatWest bank to ask about getting a loan for my masters (modern languages) and they said "sorry, we only offer loans to postgraduate students studying sciences, not humanities"

Yes, thats right. The bank only help science students. Lovely eh??? Especially as science students are so much more likely to have sponsorship!

*RAGE*


Unless I have become delusional, and unless the NatWest website is giving false information, NatWest do not offer postgraduate studies loans to anybody.

Have you got your banks confused?
Reply 3533
Original post by HLS
Unless I have become delusional, and unless the NatWest website is giving false information, NatWest do not offer postgraduate studies loans to anybody.

Have you got your banks confused?


Nope was definitely NatWest!
Reply 3534
Original post by *Corinna*
my bf had no history either and he got a CDL from co-op for classics.


awesome I'll look into that! thanks :smile:
Original post by HoVis
Hmm. To be honest - and I'll concede that I wasn't hit by the fees rise, so am probably not as bound up in this as many slightly younger students are - I don't actually oppose the rise in fees in the UK. Firstly, the system of repayments is very generous. No repayments unless you're earning above a certain amount, no interest beyond the rate of inflation, and the fact that the debt is written off if you haven't paid it after 30 years means that it is essentially a graduate tax, and those who benefit the most fiscally from a university education end up paying the most. I admit that the psychological impact of having what seems like a massive quantity hanging over you as a 'debt' can cause a problem, and Oxford, at least, is making efforts to prevent this from putting off students from lower income families (fees are means-tested here under the new system; something I also have a bit of an issue with, but I do think it is probably the best way to avoid putting off bright but poor students). The government loan for education is so much better here than it is in the States - fees are ridiculously high, the interest on loans is massive, and the debt can never be written off - not even if you declare bankrupt.



It is true that the debt can not be written off in bankruptcy, but other than that US loans are given under similar conditions:

1) Income based payment plan makes payments zero if you are making less then 150% of poverty line, currently around 20 000 dollars a year
2) Payments are capped at 15% above the level in (1), i.e. with income of 50 000 dollars a year you have to pay only 30 000 * 15% = 4 500 a year
3) Debt is cancelled after 25 years (new law will make it 20 years beginning 2014 and also 10% above 150% poverty level instead of 15%)
4) If you work for government or as a professor/teacher in a government school (professor in a public university, like UCBerkley, for example) remainder debt is cancelled after 10 years

So, it is actually better than UK conditions, with the sole exception of fees and interest, which on PLUS loans is 4% (fee) and 7.8% (interest), but PLUS loans are only taken by gradstudents after the 20500 maximum of Stafford has being exhausted each year (i.e. if you have to borrow more then 20500 dollars in each particular year). Stafford fee is 1% and interest is lower, too.
(edited 11 years ago)
Reply 3536
Original post by HoVis
<snip>

EDIT: I know this essentially makes my objection to the lower Scottish fees sound a bit silly. It's more the mild unfriendliness of the distinction that gets to me than the difference in cost. :tongue:

Yes, well if you've accepted the silliness of the Scottish objections then my main point has been reached. :smile:

I'd never further this off-topic-ness by saying that if a high enough proportion of student debt is written off then the system isn't working (for students or government) as higher education isn't being paid for at all at all. I wouldn't add that as much as I sympathise with your friends the sixth formers and younger students will be facing much more difficult barriers to entering the Radcliffe Camera if they can't afford to go there (though woot to Oxford for student grants). And I'd never derail the conversation further by adding that in this modern society higher education has become a necessity so it shouldn't be left only to the privileged. Nah, I'd never say that.

I had to pay a student contribution towards my fees (over four years €5000). If I was in debt now, there'd be no way of thinking of adding to that with a postgrad and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Oh, and genuine question after all that. Do postgrads stay around Oxford during holidays or do they head home too?
Reply 3537
Original post by WaSaDa
Yes, well if you've accepted the silliness of the Scottish objections then my main point has been reached. :smile:

I'd never further this off-topic-ness by saying that if a high enough proportion of student debt is written off then the system isn't working (for students or government) as higher education isn't being paid for at all at all. I wouldn't add that as much as I sympathise with your friends the sixth formers and younger students will be facing much more difficult barriers to entering the Radcliffe Camera if they can't afford to go there (though woot to Oxford for student grants). And I'd never derail the conversation further by adding that in this modern society higher education has become a necessity so it shouldn't be left only to the privileged. Nah, I'd never say that.

I had to pay a student contribution towards my fees (over four years €5000). If I was in debt now, there'd be no way of thinking of adding to that with a postgrad and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

Oh, and genuine question after all that. Do postgrads stay around Oxford during holidays or do they head home too?


Yeah, I don't really understand how that works. :redface: But I'm fairly sure I'll never repay my full student debt before I'm 45...

I guess the point I was trying to make is that it isn't an issue of whether you can 'afford' to go there. It's all paid for by a loan that is only paid back if you can afford to pay it back. There is of course the psychological element of not wanting to 'put yourself into debt', which could be more for those from poorer backgrounds, but that's another issue entirely and has more to do with the efficacy of outreach programmes in explaining how the loan works (which is why it ought to be called a graduate tax IMO -- but never mind!).

Back on track, postgrads tend to hang around Oxford in the holidays - most colleges I think automatically give grads leases that go throughout the vacations. (Certainly Balliol does).
Original post by WaSaDa


I'd never further this off-topic-ness by saying that if a high enough proportion of student debt is written off then the system isn't working (for students or government) as higher education isn't being paid for at all


Appearance of debt discourages from overspending. It is one thing to lend the money and then forgive the debt, it is quite different to make everything free to begin with. Plus, you do repay SOME of it, which is better than nothing :wink:
Reply 3539
Original post by WaSaDa

I'd never further this off-topic-ness by saying that if a high enough proportion of student debt is written off then the system isn't working (for students or government) as higher education isn't being paid for at all at all.


Of course it's being paid for - ultimately the taxpayer foots the bill. You'd be the darling of governments everywhere if you could find a way they could subsidise voters with no-one having to ever pay :wink:

Quick Reply