Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    http://prntscr.com/e44s74

    http://prntscr.com/e44sz9

    Understand everything except I didn't get lnA for part b as it says in the markscheme (second line). Isn't this just supposed to be a constant? Don't see why it's lnA and not just A.

    Thanks :-)
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Chickenslayer69)
    http://prntscr.com/e44s74

    http://prntscr.com/e44sz9

    Understand everything except I didn't get lnA for part b as it says in the markscheme (second line). Isn't this just supposed to be a constant? Don't see why it's lnA and not just A.

    Thanks :-)
    It's just neater this way. Note that you can let your constant be c but then how would you combine \ln(f(x))+c under a single logarithm?? Now \ln(A) is still an arbitrary constant if A>0, and the natural logarithm function means it can be any value you want it to be so there's no problem with us using it. Now since we can use it, we can combine the logarithms which makes the working out easier.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RDKGames)
    It's just neater this way. Note that you can let your constant be c but then how would you combine \ln(f(x))+c under a single logarithm?? Now \ln(A) is still an arbitrary constant if A>0, and the natural logarithm function means it can be any value you want it to be so there's no problem with us using it. Now since we can use it, we can combine the logarithms which makes the working out easier.
    Oh, so it's not that it has to be that, it just can be? I suspected that but didn't know for sure. Thanks for clarifying :-)
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Chickenslayer69)
    Oh, so it's not that it has to be that, it just can be? I suspected that but didn't know for sure. Thanks for clarifying :-)
    No it doesn't have to be. In fact for \ln[f(y)]=\ln[f(x)]+c you simply get:

    \displaystyle f(y)=e^{\ln[f(x)]+c}=e^{\ln[f(x)]} \cdot e^{c} = e^c \cdot f(x) now you can just let A=e^c since e^c is just some constant number anyway, and achieve the same answer as in the book.

    The way they did it is not a requirement, just a preference, I suppose.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: February 3, 2017
Poll
Favourite type of bread
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.