I'm currently in year 11 studying GCSE AQA Geography A.
My predicted grade is an A* but i'm on an A in Human geography and a B in physical, and i'd really like to improve.
Unfortunately our geography department consists of some newly qualified teachers who try their best but simply don't seem to be amazing when it comes to nailing getting those marks on case study questions or 'describe' questions.
I think exam technique is my main problem as I do revise the content well enough to know it, so i'd be incredibly grateful for anyone who could give me a couple of tips they know about answering any type of exam question and basically tell me what i'm meant to be writing in these lol, e.g. structuring 8 mark case study questions, how to describe a map or any data etc.
Thanks for your time!
Help with GCSE Geography Exam Technique Watch
- Thread Starter
- 06-02-2017 19:15
- 07-02-2017 21:43
*Just to let you know this copied off of some unknown website sorry*
GCSE case study questions are usually marked using a fairly standard markscheme.
The examiner will read the answer and then decide which level it falls into - Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3. Not every question will have 3 levels - 4 mark questions will only be Level 1 and 2 for example.
The key to doing well is to get your answers into the top of Level 2 and, hopefully, Level 3. This means writing detailed, well explained points backed up with case studies.
The way to get marks is not to write lots of brief points but to make sure that you develop 3 or 4 points as well as you can do. If you can get each of these points into Level 2 or Level 3 you can score high marks quickly and efficiently - leaving yourself with plenty of time to answer the rest of the paper.
A list of 9 simple points will only get Level 1 marks - 2 out of 6 or 3 out of 9 for example.
This are the standard level descriptors examiners use.
Level OneSimple points with no developmentLittle or no detailAll lists are Level 1Level TwoClear understanding demonstratedSome development of points and explanation of ideasIf example required must have one to reach Level 2Level ThreeDetailed understandingWell developed points, fully explaining the ideas and linking points togetherWell organised answer. Example clearly well understood with a detailed knowledge demonstrated
Notice that to get above a Level 1 answer you also have to use at least one appropriate example if the question asks for it. No example, no marks above Level 1.
Even if the question doesn't ask for an example it's worth including one if you can. It really helps to show the examiner that you know what you're talking about and sets you out from the crowd. Use examples!
If you really can't think of an example then the best thing to do is to guess or "be creative". You won't lose any marks by using an example which is wrong
The hard thing is knowing what a Level 3 answer looks like. So, how about an example?
Q. Using an example you have studied explain why more people are visiting distant places on holiday today.
Level 1: "People have more money today."
This is a simple point without any development. It could be part of a list.
Level 2: "People earn higher wages today so they have more money to spend on holidays than in the past."
The point develops the answer briefly to explain why it's important that people have more money. Remember, you'd need an example of a place to get into Level 2 - perhaps people going on holiday from Britain to Spain.
Level 3: "People are more affluent today so they have more disposable income to spend on holidays than in the past. This means that they can afford to travel further on holiday to places such as Costa Rica or Australia. Air travel is usually quite expensive and the further you travel the more expensive the holiday will usually cost."
The point here has been developed further to demonstrate the link between higher pay and travelling further. The answer could then go on and talk about cheaper flights and package holidays and how distant locations are more accessible due to better air travel and more airports being built.Notice as well how this answer uses technical terms like affluence and disposable income. This always impresses examiners and will gain marks. The examples used here are brief - at some point the answer would need to develop a better case study (perhaps on package holidays) - but they are enough to get the answer into Level 3,Last edited by Kadiii; 07-02-2017 at 21:46.