Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Political Ambassador
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Donald Trump Motion 2017, TSR Libertarian Party
    This House believes that the Government should invite US President Donald Trump to make an official state visit to the United Kingdom. As a nation that prides itself for its free speech, we find it completely unjust that Mr Trump should be denied a state visit on the basis of his personality and policies. A poll conducted by ‘YouGov’ in January showed that a greater number of Britons supported his visit than opposed it. Donald Trump may be a divisive and controversial character but we recognise that it would be a bad diplomatic move to block him from coming to our country.
    Source:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...st-poll-shows/
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Aye. John Bercow is a fake conservative if he opposes what Donald Trump is calling for in America. Some of the MPs irl need to learn a lesson or two from him.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    So we should extend an invitation that has already been extended and accepted? A good start for the libers.
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Aye - we've rolled the red carpet for much more extreme leaders than Trump.
    • Community Assistant
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    God, no.
    • Community Assistant
    • Wiki Support Team
    • Political Ambassador
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Aye. As a supporter of freedom of speech, I fully back this motion. Of course Trump has said unpalatable things, but the way to tackle that is not to simply shut him out, but to challenge those views through debate. Plus, the UK has hosted far more extreme leaders, so why are we taking issue with Trump?
    • Offline

      18
      Nay, he does not deserve it.
      Offline

      18
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Snufkin)
      God, no.
      Why?
      • Community Assistant
      • Political Ambassador
      • Welcome Squad
      Offline

      20
      ReputationRep:
      Abstain
      • Community Assistant
      • Clearing and Applications Advisor
      • Welcome Squad
      Offline

      20
      ReputationRep:
      Nay.
      • Political Ambassador
      Offline

      14
      ReputationRep:
      Abstain.
      • Very Important Poster
      • Study Helper
      • Welcome Squad
      Offline

      20
      ReputationRep:
      I back the motion on the basis of what it's trying to do, however, as Jammy has already said, it's unnecessary.
      • Community Assistant
      • Clearing and Applications Advisor
      Offline

      21
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by _gcx)
      Why?
      Trump does not deserve the attention.
      Offline

      18
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by notneb)
      Nay, he does not deserve it.
      And, I'm assuming, you think that Robert Mugabe, Xi Jingping and the numerous other vile cretins that have made state visits and spoken in parliament 'deserved it'?

      To the motion, aye, we've had worse, and I'm positive that we'll have worse still, but freedom of speech is absolute and no one should be barred from entering because of their political views, a couple of countries tried that approach in the last century; didn't work particularly well.
      • Wiki Support Team
      Offline

      19
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by toronto353)
      Aye. As a supporter of freedom of speech, I fully back this motion. Of course Trump has said unpalatable things, but the way to tackle that is not to simply shut him out, but to challenge those views through debate. Plus, the UK has hosted far more extreme leaders, so why are we taking issue with Trump?
      I completely agree.
      • Political Ambassador
      Online

      21
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by CoffeeGeek)
      Aye - we've rolled the red carpet for much more extreme leaders than Trump.
      (Original post by toronto353)
      Aye. As a supporter of freedom of speech, I fully back this motion. Of course Trump has said unpalatable things, but the way to tackle that is not to simply shut him out, but to challenge those views through debate. Plus, the UK has hosted far more extreme leaders, so why are we taking issue with Trump?
      (Original post by Birchington)
      I completely agree.
      So you support a lazy motion that calls for something that is already happening to be done?
      • Political Ambassador
      Offline

      16
      ReputationRep:
      Agree with Jammy Duel and mobbsy91 in this case.
      The state visit is already to take place, and so this motion is redundant.
      • Wiki Support Team
      Offline

      19
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Jammy Duel)
      So you support a lazy motion that calls for something that is already happening to be done?
      I do agree that the motion pretty much states the obvious, but see no reason to vote No purely because the motion is 'lazy'.
      Online

      20
      ReputationRep:
      I see Jammy's point. However, I support the premise of this motion and accordingly shall vote aye.
      • Community Assistant
      • Wiki Support Team
      • Political Ambassador
      • PS Reviewer
      Offline

      18
      ReputationRep:
      (Original post by Jammy Duel)
      So you support a lazy motion that calls for something that is already happening to be done?
      I don't support that element of the motion, but for me, it's about making clear I support Trump's visit, so though the motion is poorly worded and timed, as you rightly mention it, I will still be voting aye.
     
     
     
    TSR Support Team

    We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

    Updated: February 15, 2017
  1. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  2. Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
  3. See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  4. The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.