for this question I don't get his the limits are worked out. Attachment 618360618362 I know that I wasn't supposed to use the limits 1/2 and 0 but I don't get how pi/6 is worked out.
Thanks

coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 09022017 22:20

Revision help in partnership with Birmingham City University

SherlockHolmes
 Follow
 15 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to SherlockHolmes
 Community Assistant
Offline13ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 2
 09022017 22:24
(Original post by coconut64)
...
Similarly, when x=0, theta = 0.Last edited by SherlockHolmes; 09022017 at 22:26. 
Muttley79
 Follow
 42 followers
 19 badges
 Send a private message to Muttley79
Offline19ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 09022017 22:31
(Original post by coconut64)
for this question I don't get his the limits are worked out. Attachment 618360618362 I know that I wasn't supposed to use the limits 1/2 and 0 but I don't get how pi/6 is worked out.
Thanks
Then after integrating either substitute back or change limits then, You must not 'mix up'and integration of u and x.
What you have written is incorrect ... 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 10022017 14:48
(Original post by Muttley79)
Once you make the substition you should either change the limits, as explained above, or write x = 0 and x = 1/2 on the integral.
Then after integrating either substitute back or change limits then, You must not 'mix up'and integration of u and x.
What you have written is incorrect ...
Thanks 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 5
 10022017 14:57
(Original post by coconut64)
I don't get what you mean by the bit underlined. Initially I subbed sin theta straight into the equation , rather than integrating the equation involving x. I did replace dx with d theta. I know where I have gone wrong with the limits..
Thanks
So at the stage of you could've either converted into (which doesn't really apply to this question well) OR but not a mix as you have there.
By I denoteLast edited by RDKGames; 10022017 at 15:34. 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 10022017 15:01
(Original post by RDKGames)
Meaning you can ignore the limits until after you integrate. At which point, you may choose to convert your expression into terms of and apply the same limits, or instead you can change the limits to work with the expression in terms of
So at the stage of you could've either converted into (which doesn't really apply to this question) OR but not a mix as you have there.
By I denote 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 7
 10022017 15:18
(Original post by coconut64)
So I just basically need to change the limit? Since I have already have my f(x) in place, which is tan theta. So are you suggesting that this should have been [tan theta] pi/6 on top and 0 at the bottom? Thanks
And yes that is what everyone on this thread is suggesting  the change in limits. 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 8
 10022017 15:22
(Original post by RDKGames)
That is not , that is .
And yes that is what everyone on this thread is suggesting  the change in limits.Last edited by coconut64; 10022017 at 15:23. 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 9
 10022017 15:31
(Original post by coconut64)
What is f(x)? X has been replaced by sin theta already, I don't understand what you mean by suddenly change it from f theta back to f(x), The equation has been simplified to sec^2 x....
I'll give you a simple example concerning the two approaches.
then
So we have
Now we can either convert it back to and use the original limits in which case we have (this approach is not recommended for your Q) OR we can convert the limits so we have . Both of which give us the same answer.Last edited by RDKGames; 10022017 at 15:37. 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 10
 11022017 15:02
(Original post by RDKGames)
With your particular question, is just in terms of (or ) which would be for some and replacing this in your integrated expression is too messy.
I'll give you a simple example concerning the two approaches.
then
So we have
Now we can either convert it back to and use the original limits in which case we have (this approach is not recommended for your Q) OR we can convert the limits so we have . Both of which give us the same answer. 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 11
 11022017 15:06
(Original post by coconut64)
To simplify this, are you suggesting my method takes too long? 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 11022017 15:20
(Original post by RDKGames)
No, I'm only explaining what Muttley has stated when he said "You must not 'mix up'and integration of u and x" because that's what you've done with your method.
Mutterfly said I shouldn't have mixed up u and x when integrating. I get where he is coming from, because I did not change the limits 0.5 &0, although I am integrating with respect with d theta. I understand this bit.
But you are suggesting that tan theta is equivalent to the orginal equation we are given x/ (1x^2)^1.5 , but tan theta is obtained after I have integrated sec^2 x. Surely sec^2x is equal to sin theta / (1 x^2)^1.5. ThanksAttachment 618834 thanksLast edited by coconut64; 11022017 at 15:31. 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 13
 11022017 15:29
(Original post by coconut64)
Sorry to drag to this forever but I am more confused than ever.
Mutterfly said I shouldn't have mixed up u and x when integrating. I get where he is coming from, because I did not change the limits 0.5 &0, although I am integrating with respect with d theta. I understand this bit.
But you are suggesting that tan theta is equivalent to the orginal equation we are given x/ (1x^2)^1.5 , but tan theta is obtained after I have integrated sec^2 x. Surely sec^2x is equal to sin theta / (1 x^2)^1.5. ThanksLast edited by RDKGames; 11022017 at 15:30. 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 14
 11022017 15:30
(Original post by RDKGames)
I am not claiming it is equal to the original. The original is whereas I claim that for some  but this isn't a true enough statement as it's not true for all hence why this approach doesn't work very well. I have used a simpler integral to simply display the two approaches  which you now seem to understand.
Since you can 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 15
 11022017 15:31
(Original post by coconut64)
I have edited my post. Are you sure? The original equation is to the power of 1.5, not 1/2. Thanks 
coconut64
 Follow
 7 followers
 16 badges
 Send a private message to coconut64
 Thread Starter
Offline16ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 11022017 15:33
(Original post by RDKGames)
Either way, yes I am sure because in either case I did not state that [tex]\tan(\theta)[tex] is equal to it as you claim. 
DFranklin
 Follow
 61 followers
 18 badges
 Send a private message to DFranklin
Online18ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 11022017 15:40
(Original post by coconut64)
I have checked, the original equation is to the power of 1.5, not 0.5. But I appreciate your help though.
(*) AFAIK, literally the only thing he's said about the original equation is "The original is ". Yes this isn't correct, but since he only quoted it to say "I'm not talking about the original integral I'm talking about " it doesn't invalidate anything else he said. He's still not talking about the original equation, and it still is a different equation from 
RDKGames
 Follow
 127 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to RDKGames
 Community Assistant
Offline20ReputationRep:Community Assistant Follow
 18
 11022017 15:40
(Original post by coconut64)
I have checked, the original equation is to the power of 1.5, not 0.5. But I appreciate your help though.
If you wish to keep your limits the same, then you must express in terms of thus express it in terms of . But you cannot define in terms of for all . You can sure try, and it works, but it doesn't hold for all theta hence why it breaks down when you come to use it and why the approach of simply changing the limits is the better option. To do this you would have to go
I have indicated the step where it breaks down by '=='
As said by DFranklin above, it has nothing to do with the original expression.Last edited by RDKGames; 11022017 at 15:47.
Related discussions
 C4/AEA Integration Question
 C4: Integration by substitution exam question help
 C4 Integration by substitution question
 A2 c4 maths integration question help
 C4 An integration question!
 C4 Parametric differentiation/Integration Question
 C4 Integration Maths Question: Where did I go wrong..?
 Need help with a C4 substitution integration question
 C4 Trig Integration question
 C4 small integration question
Related university courses

Mathematics with Statistics
University of Surrey

Economics, Statistics and Mathematics
Queen Mary University of London

Accounting, Finance and Mathematics
Lancaster University

Applied Mathematics
University of Aberdeen

Mathematics
University of Aberdeen

Mathematics
University of Winchester

Mathematics with Computing
Middlesex University

Mathematics and Statistics
University of Oxford

Mathematics and Statistics
University of Oxford

Mathematics for Finance (with a year abroad)
Swansea University
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 SherlockHolmes
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 rayquaza17
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 harryleavey
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Rexar
 Sonechka
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 an_atheist
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel