Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Should convicted pedophiles receive the death penalty? Watch

  • View Poll Results: Should pedophiles be killed?
    Yes
    66
    36.67%
    No
    114
    63.33%

    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sycatonne23)
    Yes, murder of somebody who is completely innocent is abhorrent. There is no moral equivalence between killing somebody innocent and killing a child molester.

    "at least they continue to live their lives..." seriously? You're going to trivialise child sexual assault like that? Disgusting. Grow a moral backbone.
    The fact that you had to result to an ad homienem and a reduction ad absurdum just shows that you know the logic behind this is flawed.

    Focus on the facts of the matter, not emotional sway.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    Congratulation on making one of the dumbest posts ever.

    On that basis you might as well just kill anyone who gets a custodial sentence.
    How so?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    Using that "logic"...

    you assumedly think imprisonment is abhorrent but it's ok when the state does it to someone who hasn't even taken anyone's life.

    You oppose the state imprisoning criminals?
    Prison is protecting the public so yeah, execution is a needless, pointless and expensive show of State strength in the name of some vague concept of "deterrence" if you were arguing 'an eye for an eye' I could at least see the logic behind the argument (although I still disagree with executions.)

    This, on the other hand, is just killing for killing's sake, it's absurd.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    The fact that you had to result to an ad homienem and a reduction ad absurdum just shows that you know the logic behind this is flawed.

    Focus on the facts of the matter, not emotional sway.
    It isn't a damn ad hominem to say that there's no moral equivalence between the state taking the life of a child molester and somebody murdering an innocent person.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sycatonne23)
    It isn't a damn ad hominem to say that there's no moral equivalence between the state taking the life of a child molester and somebody murdering an innocent person.
    Calling my views "distgusting" and telling me to "grow a moral backbone" however, would qualify, I'm sure you agree.

    Morality is subjective, stop trying to force your morals onto everyone else.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Calling my views "distgusting" and telling me to "grow a moral backbone" however, would qualify, I'm sure you agree.

    Morality is subjective, stop trying to force your morals onto everyone else.
    Yes, that would qualify and it is certainly in your case accurate. If you want to keep a child molester alive, then you unequivocally have a moral deficiency which needs further examination. In my subjective opinion of course.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Prison is protecting the public so yeah, execution is a needless, pointless and expensive show of State strength in the name of some vague concept of "deterrence" if you were arguing 'an eye for an eye' I could at least see the logic behind the argument (although I still disagree with executions.)

    This, on the other hand, is just killing for killing's sake, it's absurd.
    Death is 100% guaranteed to prevent paedophiles from reoffending.

    I would promote the death penalty for murderers,rapists and paedophiles as a punishment, not as a deterrent.

    The subhumans willing to rape a child are beyond deterrent.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    Death is 100% guaranteed to prevent paedophiles from reoffending.

    I would promote the death penalty for murderers,rapists and paedophiles as a punishment, not as a deterrent.

    The subhumans willing to rape a child are beyond deterrent.
    Would a full life tariff not also prevent the same thing?

    People only shout about reinstating the death penalty because we've gone soft on crime and prison sentences are far too short for most offences, life should mean life, but the state shouldn't have the power to kill anyone, that's a slippery slope.
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    19
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    So, in states where the death penalty is lawful, it is not an infringement of human rights, because its lawful.

    Yes?
    You are confused. We arent in the US and they arent signed up to the ECHR.
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    19
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    Death is 100% guaranteed to prevent paedophiles from reoffending.

    I would promote the death penalty for murderers,rapists and paedophiles as a punishment, not as a deterrent.

    The subhumans willing to rape a child are beyond deterrent.
    Except the criminal justice system isnt fullproof and innocent people will die.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Kill them all screw their human rights. Dirty wronguns
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    Death is 100% guaranteed to prevent paedophiles from reoffending.

    I would promote the death penalty for murderers,rapists and paedophiles as a punishment, not as a deterrent.

    The subhumans willing to rape a child are beyond deterrent.
    Because penal justice has served us brilliantly to this point.

    (Original post by joe cooley)
    Well, that you believe it acceptable to imprison paedophiles is a least a start.
    Well it's a start and an end.

    [QUOTE=Sycatonne23;70117540]Either way, studies have proven that the death penalty has a deterrent effect.

    No, studies have suggested that. There's a difference between suggestion and proof. I can't refute those studies are because 1. I can't be bothered to read 50 pages right now and 2. I don't understand the equations they're using.

    (Original post by Sycatonne23)
    Sure, you can phrase it like that if you want to. I support the government killing atrocious despicable child molesting scum. If you want to keep them alive despite knowing the damage they've inflicted on another human being then you're the one who needs to question his moral conscience, not me.
    What benefit is served by killing people? How has society benefitted? That is after all what criminal justice about, making society better rather than making the victim feel better.

    (Original post by That'sGreat)
    Would you rather they drunk out of a golden chalice and cost the government and hence, the taxpayer, 40k a year per prisoner? I'm sure you'd hope we give them the latest game son the latest consoles, maybe put a McDonald's in the canteen and have Krispy Kreme Friday? Heck, why not let them go home on Saturdays and Sunday's? Or what if we only made them stay from 9 till 5, and let them go home to their families after it? And as for people who make false claims about paedophiles, why not give them a few hundred quid every claim? Keep the justice system on their toes!
    Well some of those ideas aren't too bad actually, not such a fan of the going home part or the paying false accusers. Other than that I see no real issue. There are some more changes that need to be made but I think you're heading in the right direction.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    You are confused. We arent in the US and they arent signed up to the ECHR.
    No, you're confused.

    So, in states where the death penalty is lawful, it is not an infringement of human rights, because its lawful.

    I was not referring to the US, that's why i said states, plural.

    Meaning other countries.

    State can be used instead of country,yes?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=Underscore__;70118026]Because penal justice has served us brilliantly to this point.



    Well it's a start and an end.

    (Original post by Sycatonne23)
    Either way, studies have proven that the death penalty has a deterrent effect.

    No, studies have suggested that. There's a difference between suggestion and proof. I can't refute those studies are because 1. I can't be bothered to read 50 pages right now and 2. I don't understand the equations they're using.



    What benefit is served by killing people? How has society benefitted? That is after all what criminal justice about, making society better rather than making the victim feel better.



    Well some of those ideas aren't too bad actually, not such a fan of the going home part or the paying false accusers. Other than that I see no real issue. There are some more changes that need to be made but I think you're heading in the right direction.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Oh, you're a troll, OK.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=That'sGreat;70118090]
    (Original post by Underscore__)
    Because penal justice has served us brilliantly to this point.



    Well it's a start and an end.



    Oh, you're a troll, OK.
    Troll because I've rebutted every point that I've quoted? Clearly we have different understandings of that word


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    Except the criminal justice system isnt fullproof and innocent people will die.
    If that's why you oppose the death penalty logically you would oppose the state imprisoning criminals as.....

    the criminal justice system isnt fullproof and innocent people will be imprisoned

    Yes?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=Underscore__;70118110]
    (Original post by That'sGreat)

    Troll because I've rebutted every point that I've quoted? Clearly we have different understandings of that word


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    I was referring more to you thinking the idea of giving them a pampered time in a cushy cell as a great idea.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joe cooley)
    If that's why you oppose the death penalty logically you would oppose the state imprisoning criminals as.....

    the criminal justice system isnt fullproof and innocent people will be imprisoned

    Yes?
    You can release people who subsequently found not guilty. At present we don't have the technology to bring dead people back to life


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=That'sGreat;70118196]
    (Original post by Underscore__)

    I was referring more to you thinking the idea of giving them a pampered time in a cushy cell as a great idea.
    Well I suggest you take a look at the Norwegian justice system and then take a look at their recidivism (reoffending) rate. Of course, you haven't already done that because you don't know the first thing about criminal justice


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=Underscore__;70118218]
    (Original post by That'sGreat)

    Well I suggest you take a look at the Norwegian justice system and then take a look at their recidivism (reoffending) rate. Of course, you haven't already done that because you don't know the first thing about criminal justice


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Like every Scandinavian country, you'll see there's a big difference between them and Britain. That's something called multiculturalism, Scandinavian countries are famous for having a large population of white and ethnics, which is a lot different to Britian. Britian is full of different people from different countries and hence, different cultures. Its pretty common knowledge. Also, i didn't realise we were going to resort to outlandish claims which a rent even relevant to your point. Understanding the criminal justice system of Britian, the country we are in, is completely different to understanding the ins and outs justice system in Norway, or Nigeria or Saudi Arabia.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.