Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Note: Just a quick reminder to say that this will not apply if passed in TSRland

    B1117 – English Votes for English Laws Bill 2017, Jammy Duel MP Seconded by: Nigel Farage MEP MP











    English Votes for English Laws Bill 2017
    A Bill to strengthen existing measures reducing the influence of MPs representing constituencies covered by devolved powers have on legislation that does no affect their constituents.









    BE IT ENACTED by The Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in accordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:-

    1. Restrictions applied
    (1) MPs may not vote on legislation, or parts of legislation, if they represent a constituency unaffected by the legislation in question

    2. Commencement, Short Title and Extent
    This Act may be referred to as the EVEL Act 2017
    This Act will extend to the United Kingdom; and;
    This Act shall come into force immediately.


    Notes
    The purpose of this bill is to extend the current EVEL implementation from mere veto powers to sole voting rights, the assessment of whether it is an England, or England and Wales, only issue is unchanged. This also applies to specific provisions where certain parts of a bill do not extend to the whole of the UK, for instance sections of finance bills relating to means on taxation which have been devolved.

    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    Virtually nothing is an England- or England-and-Wales-only issue because of the Barnett formula and funding framework.

    I oppose this: the best way to solve this issue is a proper parliament for the English nation.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Any Bill which creates, or authorises, any spending, has an impact on all constituencies. While the premise is fine, the name is not, and I suspect this will affect possibly 1 Bill in the next century.

    Also, do the authors mean to devolve more power to the devolved nations by way of this? That would be a side-effect.

    Nay.
    • Section Leader
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    Peer Support Volunteers
    Nay.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I'm skeptical of the wording involved here for the reasons TDA mentioned.

    Abstain.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Lol no the solution is regional parliaments for England.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Any Bill which creates, or authorises, any spending, has an impact on all constituencies. While the premise is fine, the name is not, and I suspect this will affect possibly 1 Bill in the next century.

    Also, do the authors mean to devolve more power to the devolved nations by way of this? That would be a side-effect.

    Nay.
    There is no intention of this directly leading to further devolution, however there are elements of taxation already devolved, and the Scottish are gaining more controls over taxation with full control of income tax either this year or next year IIRC, for instance, this bill would include any provisions of a finance bill pertaining specifically to income tax would exclude Scottish MPs on this basis; they have full control in their devolved parliament to control income tax rates and thresholds ergo there is no reason they should have any say on the ratea and thresholds in the rest of the country, in the exact same way that we have no say over French policy.

    And if you think that only one bill per century is affected then the first year of the RL implementation must have been a millennium long, for 9 bills were certified as England or England and Wales only in the first 12 months.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    There is no intention of this directly leading to further devolution, however there are elements of taxation already devolved, and the Scottish are gaining more controls over taxation with full control of income tax either this year or next year IIRC, for instance, this bill would include any provisions of a finance bill pertaining specifically to income tax would exclude Scottish MPs on this basis; they have full control in their devolved parliament to control income tax rates and thresholds ergo there is no reason they should have any say on the ratea and thresholds in the rest of the country, in the exact same way that we have no say over French policy.

    And if you think that only one bill per century is affected then the first year of the RL implementation must have been a millennium long, for 9 bills were certified as England or England and Wales only in the first 12 months.
    Extent is not the same thing as having an effect.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by TheDefiniteArticle)
    Extent is not the same thing as having an effect.
    Then a wording clarification is in order to make clear that the bill removes the whole UK vote from the existing procedure, which is the intention of the bill.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    Then a wording clarification is in order to make clear that the bill removes the whole UK vote from the existing procedure, which is the intention of the bill.
    In which case I am very strongly opposed, as it amounts to an English dictatorship over the devolved nations.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    There is no intention of this directly leading to further devolution, however there are elements of taxation already devolved, and the Scottish are gaining more controls over taxation with full control of income tax either this year or next year IIRC, for instance, this bill would include any provisions of a finance bill pertaining specifically to income tax would exclude Scottish MPs on this basis; they have full control in their devolved parliament to control income tax rates and thresholds ergo there is no reason they should have any say on the ratea and thresholds in the rest of the country, in the exact same way that we have no say over French policy.

    And if you think that only one bill per century is affected then the first year of the RL implementation must have been a millennium long, for 9 bills were certified as England or England and Wales only in the first 12 months.
    Except IIRC the Scottish Parliament can only vary income tax by up to 10p and cannot change the bands, so it's hard to write an income tax bill with no effect on Scotland.
    • Very Important Poster
    Online

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    So all the Scottish MP's could declare Scotland independent in parliament and no one could stop them?
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Political Ambassador
    Nay
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    nay
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    Community Assistant
    Political Ambassador
    Nay

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Aston Villa FC Supporter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Aston Villa FC Supporter
    I don't believe this is necessary, nay
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    I'm skeptical of the wording involved here for the reasons TDA mentioned.

    Abstain.
    I swear ur not an MP.
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by fleky6910)
    I swear ur not an MP.
    Indeed not, considering my party didn't exist in the last election, fear not though, I will return to the division lobby in due course when we take at least 5 Tory seats at the next election.

    Regardless, there's nothing stopping saying how I would vote on a bill at the debate stage.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Connor27)
    Indeed not, considering my party didn't exist in the last election, fear not though, I will return to the division lobby in due course when we take at least 5 Tory seats at the next election.

    Regardless, there's nothing stopping saying how I would vote on a bill at the debate stage.
    Would you be able to fill those seats though?
    Online

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by fleky6910)
    Would you be able to fill those seats though?
    Myself, Andrew, Joe, George is 4 seats right there; fear not we will recruit more people and we have some trump cards lined up for when we get a TSR sub forum.
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: February 25, 2017
Poll
Favourite type of bread

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.