Several "Goldilocks Zone" planets found. The end of "Fine Tuning"?

I do quite like the idea of travelling to these far-away star systems using robotics alone, but I am guessing that when we find somewhere hospitable humans will desperately want to go there to start a new civilisation.

Doesn't the fine tuning argument refer to the fundamental laws of physics rather than Earth's climatic conditions?

I think you misunderstood my point. Humans (or at least, humans as we know them) won't exist.

We will develop all our off-switch technology to be superior to the AI.

I don't see why we'd go extinct. Plus, a symbiote will probably be superior to any of us in our pure forms.

Fine tuning was never really that credible, mere egotism ignoring statistics and basing itself off an irrelevantly small data set

There is no reason to assume it can't, the mechanisms are functionally the same, and the idea that thought it unique to biology is nothing but pseudoscience.

Why is it pseudoscience? We know nothing about how consciousness works.Its probably more pseudoscience to assume that you can do the exact same thing with silicon as you can with carbon and water.The chemistry of life is unique and I see no reason to think that you can replicate those processes using silicon and some metal.The brain is like a computer but it's not exactly the same.Even if you can do it it won't be anytime soon.

Because at the very least, you could make a working virtual copy of a human brain.

Wouldn't the goldilocks zone for a planet depend on atmospheric conditions? The Goldilocks zone is the range where water can exist in liquid form by the temperature range from the Star but water being in liquid form also depends on atmospheric pressure. I did an EPQ on a relevant topic but the only definition I found was that but I don't know whether it also includes a atmospheric pressure range that humans can live in.

You could make a virtual copy of the process of photosynthesis on a computer.That does not mean the computer is actually photosynthesising.You need chlorophyll to do that. I don't know.I don't think it's possible.

But it's a bit much to say it's pseudoscience when we don't know so much about how the brain works.A human brain is complex and it's a bit much to say we can just replicate it.

They should start smaller.We have computers that can do millions of calculations a second but none of them can think or show autonomous behaviour on even the level of a dog or a cat.A dog shows much more ability to think or self awareness than a computer ever has.And that's what I'm getting at computers can do calculations and whatever it's programmed to do but it lacks self awareness. I'm sceptical at any rate.