"Critically examine the use of “reasonable suspicion” as the basis for police powers to stop, search and arrest people under PACE. Should the interpretation of “reasonable” be criticised as giving even the lowest ranking police officer so much subjective discretion as to allow persistent prejudice, or might it be justified as a means of providing the police with the flexibility and power they need to be effective?"
I have a couple of points however nowhere near the word limit!! If you guys have any ideas please let me know!! :'( :'(