Psychology AQA A2 Evaluation Question

Watch this thread
GalacticBG
Badges: 5
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#1
Hi guys, I've been struggling on how to make effective evaluation points for psychology. The exam revision guide I'm using (Exam Companion) says that you should use 5 evaluation points, and a "Point-Elaboration-Link" format, for e.g:

There are problems in determining the causal diathesis in this model. Research suggests that stressors in early life setup maladaptive coping methods, so the person is less able to cope with later stressors in life. This suggest it may not be a genetic vulnerability that triggers schizophrenia, but a lack of resilience to stress.

Would this be enough to score 2 marks on an evaluation? Also, when evaluating and providing research support, do I just focus on the findings and not the procedures of the research? Lastly, do I need to memorise all of the researcher's names and dates?

Sorry for the long post

Thanks in advance !
0
reply
Deyesy
Badges: 20
Rep:
? You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report 5 years ago
#2
(Original post by GalacticBG)
Hi guys, I've been struggling on how to make effective evaluation points for psychology. The exam revision guide I'm using (Exam Companion) says that you should use 5 evaluation points, and a "Point-Elaboration-Link" format, for e.g:

There are problems in determining the causal diathesis in this model. Research suggests that stressors in early life setup maladaptive coping methods, so the person is less able to cope with later stressors in life. This suggest it may not be a genetic vulnerability that triggers schizophrenia, but a lack of resilience to stress.

Would this be enough to score 2 marks on an evaluation? Also, when evaluating and providing research support, do I just focus on the findings and not the procedures of the research? Lastly, do I need to memorise all of the researcher's names and dates?

Sorry for the long post

Thanks in advance !
You definitely won't need to remember all the researcher's names and dates - as long you're able to accurately explain the study and and it's findings; saying 'a researcher found X' would be enough If you can remember dates and names, it's obviously better
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest

Does school Maths prepare people well enough for the future?

Yes, it gives everyone a good foundation for any future path (41)
32.28%
Somewhat, if your future involves maths/STEM (58)
45.67%
No, it doesn't teach enough practical life skills (27)
21.26%
Something else (tell us in the thread) (1)
0.79%

Watched Threads

View All