B1182 - Handgun Ownership and Regulation Bill 2017

Watch
This discussion is closed.
cranbrook_aspie
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#1
B1182 - Handgun Ownership and Regulation Bill 2017, Rt Hon Jammy Duel MP

Image
Handgun Ownership and Regulation Bill 2017

An Act to reintroduce strictly regulated handgun ownership to the UK for those who demonstrate the ability to handle handguns safely and are of sound mind.

BE IT ENACTED by The Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in accordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

1: Definitions
(1) For the purposes of this bill a "handgun" shall be defined as a single action, double action, or semi-automatic weapon designed for one handed use;
(2) For the purposes of this bill a "certification body" shall be defined as any gun club or other body registered with the Home Office to be able to certify competence with a handgun;;
(3) For the purposes of this bill a "Registered Psychiatrist" shall be a member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists or any other body recognised by the Department of Health as a professional organisation of psychiatrists.

2: Competence certification
(1) Any certification body may award Competence Certification that has demonstrated thorough understanding of safe storage and handling of handguns and ammunition;
(2) Competence certification expires ten years after being issued;
(3) Competence certification can be renewed at any time;
(4) Failure to show the necessary competence when attempting to renew certification will lead to immediate voiding of existing certification, irrespective of how long certification has been held.

3: Psychiatric evaluation
(1) All prospective handgun owners must pass a psychiatric evaluation carried out by a registered psychiatrist;
(2) An examinee is deemed to have failed if:
(a) They are diagnosed with or suspected to have, pending final diagnosis, severe depression;
(b) They are diagnosed with or suspected to have, pending final diagnosis, any mental disorder which may cause them to pose an elevated threat to the public as defined by the Home Office and Department of Health;
(3) An examinee is deemed to be in good mental health for 5 years after passing a psychiatric evaluation unless found to have minor depression;
(4) If an individual is diagnosed with a minor case of depression either in a psychiatric evaluation or by a GP they must be reassessed every 6 months until they are deemed to be in good mental health or are deemed to fail the assessment; (5) Psychiatric evaluations purely to prove good mental health for handgun ownership shall not be covered by the NHS;

4: Criminal Record Checks
(1) A prospective handgun owner must pass a criminal record check;
(2) A prospective handgun owner is deemed to have passed a criminal record check if:
(a) They do not have any charges for violent or firearms related offences for which they were not acquitted on their criminal record; and
(b) They do not have any charges on their criminal record for the prior 5 years for which they have not been acquitted on their criminal record; and
(c) have not served a jail term of any length in the prior 5 years.

5: Handgun licencing
(1) Handgun licences shall be issued on a "shall-issue" basis if the applicant:
(a) possesses competent certification in accordance with Section 2; and
(b) has passed a psychiatric evaluation in accordance with Section 3; and
(c) has passed a criminal record check in accordance with Section 4;
(2) A handgun licence shall be revoked if:
(a) The holder ceases to hold a valid competence certification in accordance with Section 2; or
(b) The holder ceases to be deemed in good mental health in accordance with Section 3; or
(c) The holder is found guilty of any crime in accordance with law;
(3) A handgun licence shall be suspended and all the holders handguns seized by the police if the holder is charged with any crime until such a time that they are acquitted or the licence is revoked;
(4) After revocation of their licence any former licencee must rescind ownership of all firearms of have them verified as disabled by the police, and must rescind ownership of all ammunition.

6: Sales, registration, and storage of handguns and ammunition
(1) All handguns must be registered with the police;
(2) Handguns may only be sold to individuals who produce on purchase a valid handgun licence;
(3) Ammunition may only be sold to a licence holder for handguns they have registration documentation for;
(4) Handguns and ammunition must be in secure storage when:
(a) on public land;
(b) on private land unless consent to the contrary is given by the landowner and the registered owner has the handgun on their person or is supervising the safe use of the handgun.

7: penalties
(1) Any individual found to possess a handgun in contravention of Section 5 shall be liable to a fine nor more than £50,000 per firearm, and/or a prison term not exceeding 5 years per handgun;
(2) Any individual found to possess not more than 250 rounds of ammunition that no handgun they are registered as owning can fire they shall be liable to a fine of not more than £100 per round;
(3) Any individual found to possess more than 250 rounds of ammunition that no handgun they are registered as owning can fire shall be liable to a fine not more than £100 per round and a prison term not exceeding 10 years;
(4) Any individual found to sell a handgun in contravention of Section 6 shall be liable to a fine of not more than £50,000 and/or a prison term not exceeding 5 years; (5) Any business found to sell a handgun in contravention of Section 6 shall be liable to a fine of not more than £100,000 and/or a suspension of their licence to sell firearms;
(6) Any individual found to sell ammunition in contravention of Section 6 shall be liable to a fine of not more than £100 per round and/or a prison term not exceeding 5 years;
(7) Any business found to sell a handgun in contravention of Section 6 shall be liable to a fine of not more than £250 per round and/or a suspension of their licence to sell firearms.

8: commencement and extend
(1) This Act extends to England and Wales;
(2) The provisions of this Act come into force immediately following Royal Assent. (3) This Act may be cited as the Handgun Ownership and Regulation Act 2017.

This bill allows for the ownership of handguns and carry of on private property to those who have demonstrated themselves competent in handgun safety, and show no signs of undue danger to themselves or others through ownership of a firearm. Section 2 means that only those who have demonstrated beyond reasonable doubt that they are, from a practical and theoretical standpoint, safe with a handgun may own one. Section 3 means that only those who do not post an elevated risk to others can legally own a firearm, and those who show signs of suicidal tendencies are also barred from ownership. Section 4 excludes from legal ownership those who have a proved violent history, or a recent history of crime, no matter how petty.

The original handgun bans were unnecessary knee jerk reactions and over the last 20 years there has been no evidence to show that this has made the country any safer:
the homicide rate remains unchanged
Spoiler:
Show

Image


The reduction of violent crime did not accelerate
Spoiler:
Show

Image


Reported overall crime rates were not reduced, and estimated crime rates did not decrease any faster


And before anybody shouts "but America" there is also no strong correlation between gun ownership and homicide rates either in the US:
Spoiler:
Show

Image


Or globally
Spoiler:
Show

Image



The original bans were emotionally motivated and there is no evidence of any tangible benefit, consequently all the bans achieve is to prohibit otherwise sane and law abiding citizens from the right to bear arms on private property with the consent of the land owner, and this bill intend to mark a compromise between this right, and ensuring that it is only law abiding, sane individuals who can demonstrate they are safe to own a gun are the only ones able to do so.
0
LifeIsFine
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 years ago
#2
Minimum age perhaps? Can I ask what you mean by "secure storage" in 6(4)? Apart from that, while I am opposed to gun ownership I will vote aye if sent to division
0
username2080673
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#3
Report 3 years ago
#3
It's unnecessary. Nay.
0
username2808800
Badges: 6
Rep:
?
#4
Report 3 years ago
#4
What problem is this fixing?
It is an unnecessary change. Whilst you have a valid point , I don't see the benefits this will bring except for tax revenues from guns.
The homicide rate is already low , this is just change for the sake of change.

Nay.
0
Basiil17
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#5
Report 3 years ago
#5
Nay.
0
Basiil17
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 3 years ago
#6
Nay
0
Mr T 999
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#7
Report 3 years ago
#7
Nay
0
Jammy Duel
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#8
Report 3 years ago
#8
(Original post by LifeIsFine)
Minimum age perhaps? Can I ask what you mean by "secure storage" in 6(4)? Apart from that, while I am opposed to gun ownership I will vote aye if sent to division
Same as is the case for other firearms, I'll introduce a minimum age of 21, and put in the licencing cost I believe I forgotto include when writing, I am generally open to amendments if it helps with those that aren't part of "noooo, guns are evil and private ownership would lead to massacres no matter how stringent the regulations on ownership" crowd

(Original post by fleky6910)
What problem is this fixing?
It is an unnecessary change. Whilst you have a valid point , I don't see the benefits this will bring except for tax revenues from guns.
The homicide rate is already low , this is just change for the sake of change.

Nay.
The authoritarianism is strong in this thread, the original ban was unnecessary as evidenced by no changes stemming from it other than the emotionally driven removal of rights. I'll await an actual justification of why this is a bad idea but I expect you at least will not be able to find one independently.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
username2808800
Badges: 6
Rep:
?
#9
Report 3 years ago
#9
(Original post by Jammy Duel)
Same as is the case for other firearms, I'll introduce a minimum age of 21, and put in the licencing cost I believe I forgotto include when writing, I am generally open to amendments if it helps with those that aren't part of "noooo, guns are evil and private ownership would lead to massacres no matter how stringent the regulations on ownership" crowd



The authoritarianism is strong in this thread, the original ban was unnecessary as evidenced by no changes stemming from it other than the emotionally driven removal of rights. I'll await an actual justification of why this is a bad idea but I expect you at least will not be able to find one independently.

Posted from TSR Mobile
And you are not authoritarian? LMFAO :rofl: :rofl:
You didn't actually say what problem this is solving .
It is an unnecessary change.
0
Quamquam123
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#10
Report 3 years ago
#10
Nay. The system's perfectly fine at the moment without people prancing about with guns in their back pockets.
0
Joep95
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#11
Report 3 years ago
#11
(Original post by fleky6910)
And you are not authoritarian? LMFAO :rofl: :rofl:
You didn't actually say what problem this is solving .
It is an unnecessary change.
It's removing authoritarian laws that were created because of emotion rather, the government should not infringe on you as long as you haven't violated anyone else's rights
0
username2808800
Badges: 6
Rep:
?
#12
Report 3 years ago
#12
(Original post by joecphillips)
It's removing authoritarian laws that were created because of emotion rather, the government should not infringe on you as long as you haven't violated anyone else's rights
Jammy is authoritarian which is why it is funny.
0
CoffeeAndPolitics
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#13
Report 3 years ago
#13
Nay - This is completely unnecessary and I'm happy with the current system.
1
barnetlad
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#14
Report 3 years ago
#14
Nay. We need fewer guns not more
0
Joep95
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#15
Report 3 years ago
#15
(Original post by barnetlad)
Nay. We need fewer guns not more
Why?
0
username280380
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#16
Report 3 years ago
#16
Nayyy
0
Saracen's Fez
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#17
Report 3 years ago
#17
Why does anybody need a handgun?
0
Gladstone1885
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#18
Report 3 years ago
#18
(Original post by Saracen's Fez)
Why does anybody need a handgun?
Why does anybody need healthcare?

Aye, great bill but the certification section needs tighter regulation otherwise there's no point in including it, which is fine too.
0
Saracen's Fez
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#19
Report 3 years ago
#19
(Original post by Gladstone1885)
Why does anybody need healthcare?
So they don't suffer extreme pain, pass contagious diseases on to large numbers of people, or die prematurely.
0
Gladstone1885
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#20
Report 3 years ago
#20
(Original post by Saracen's Fez)
So they don't suffer extreme pain, pass contagious diseases on to large numbers of people, or die prematurely.
So they can defend their family, property and person.
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Are you travelling in the Uni student travel window (3-9 Dec) to go home for Christmas?

Yes (54)
29.51%
No - I have already returned home (23)
12.57%
No - I plan on travelling outside these dates (42)
22.95%
No - I'm staying at my term time address over Christmas (16)
8.74%
No - I live at home during term anyway (48)
26.23%

Watched Threads

View All