frustrated by feminists

Scroll to see replies

Reply 320

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

This is real feminism

[video="youtube;FIRT7lf8byw"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIRT7lf8byw[/video]

I agree, feminism always was about putting bi.tches first.

Reply 321

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

I agree, feminism always was about putting bi.tches first.

OK then.

Reply 322

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

OK then.

Does it make you sad that in 50 years time feminism will be totally destroyed? :smile:

Either the alt-right will win and progressivism will be torn apart or Islam will dominate and Shariah law will outlaw feminism.

Reply 323

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

Does it make you sad that in 50 years time feminism will be totally destroyed? :smile:

Either the alt-right will win and progressivism will be torn apart or Islam will dominate and Shariah law will outlaw feminism.

Does it make you sad you are more in line with Islamists views than I am?

Reply 324

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

Does it make you sad you are more in line with Islamists views than I am?

To me Muhammad was a man who created a social system he could use to maximise his own happiness as derived from his own subjective experience of the world and not only do I respect that but I maintain that the act of doing so was absolutely moral and I have never opposed Islam on the grounds that it's not European since Islam as an ideology is separate from racial and cultural distinctions.

I hope this answers your question. :smile:

Reply 325

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

It didn't answer anything.

You'd be on board with the Islamist Mullahs and their sexist views I assume given that none answer. Guess I will have to rely on the feminists to appose them.

Spoiler

Reply 326

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

It didn't answer anything.

You'd be on board with the Islamist Mullahs and their sexist views I assume given that none answer. Guess I will have to rely on the feminists to appose them.

Spoiler

I love the Peshmerga. I guess the unifying factor is that the best people are those who are untouched by the cancer of European neo-Christian thought which is the precursor to progressive leftism.

Reply 327

Somepersonhere

Original post by humbert-humbert

anyone else absolutely sick to death of 'third wave' feminists??? a girl said to me, "you're a girl, you should be a feminist"... my immediate thought was that surely you saying I should believe in something purely because of my gender, goes entirely against the notion of feminism itself? hypocrisy at its finest eh

You go girl

Reply 328

Rhythmical

This is why I am a meminist.

Reply 329

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

I love the Peshmerga. I guess the unifying factor is that the best people are those who are untouched by the cancer of European neo-Christian thought which is the precursor to progressive leftism.

The YPG (which is who those women fighters are) are a bunch of democratic confederalists. They are a dam sight more radical and progressive than western liberal feminists lol. Their whole libertarian socialist ideology is built on top of radical feminism. If you don't like liberal feminists you wont like them :rofl:

(edited 6 years ago)

Reply 330

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

The YPG (which is who those women fighters are) are a bunch of democratic confederalists. They are a dam sight more radical and progressive than western liberal feminists lol. If you don't like liberal feminists you wont like them :rofl:

Don't be so ridiculous CB, radical leftists are a lot less awful than progressives. It's not a linear continuum where you go further left and you become more progressive and more feminised. Stalin and Che were further left than the average blue haired campus libtard, but both of them were a damn site less cancerous.

Reply 331

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

Don't be so ridiculous CB, radical leftists are a lot less awful than progressives. It's not a linear continuum where you go further left and you become more progressive and more feminised. Stalin and Che were further left than Jess Phillips, but both of them were a damn site less cancerous.

Progressive is generally used to describe that kind of politics. It can take different forms and it is always debatable to whether it is good or not. I don't really view liberals as very progressive but that doesn't stop it being a legit descriptive of them.

I was about to say we actually agree more than would appear before you went into loony town by saying Jess Philips is worse than Stalin :rofl:

Jess Philips unhelpfully confrontational but that does not compare to gulags :facepalm:

Maybe when she starts putting men in work camps you can start making that kind of comparison.

So you are fine with women who have guns educating men on how not to be sexist?

I'm glad I can rely on your support come the revolution to overthrow capitalism though.

(edited 6 years ago)

Reply 332

l'etranger

Original post by ChaoticButterfly

Jess Philips unhelpfully confrontational but that does not compare to gulags :facepalm:

I'm fine with women with legally owned firearms say in America killing attempted rapists. :smile:

Reply 333

ChaoticButterfly

Original post by l'etranger

I'm fine with women with legally owned firearms say in America killing attempted rapists. :smile:

How about using fire arms to defend the revolution?

Reply 334

HassanMZ

Greetings everyone!

I never thought I would actually post a reply on this forum, the only reason I made an account a few weeks ago was to access English Language notes for an upcoming examination. However, when TSR sent me an email alerting me about the most active topics (including this one) I knew I had to give my input on a topic so close to my heart. I believe in rational argumentation rather than empty claims and I hope I can communicate my thoughts by means of this thread in a way that is neither offensive nor disrespectful.

Feminism has its roots ingrained in history as early as the 18th Century when women started becoming self aware of the issues they faced, and in all honesty they were treated terribly. However since then after a long pursuit of advocating for their fights and difficult battles, women have elevated their standards to be able to stand proud with their heads raised. The contemporary issues that they seem to concern themselves are indeed petty in nature and go against the fundamental principles of what the movement originally set out to achieve. It fought for equality in office (women now have salaries equal to men, the gender wage gap does not exist), for representation in political office (women now have equal votes and the likes of Hilary Clinton and Benazir Bhutto have since then come to power) and for equal opportunities in education which largely seems to be fixed. The aims of the revolutionary movement have been conquered (save some inferences from religious and cultural constraints) and thus the movement is now redundant.

Feminism by definition is a sexist ideology:Feminism preaches 'equality for all' but in reality it focuses too much emphasis on rights for women instead of other minority groups and ethnic races that have suffered far greater historical oppression at the hands of dominant powers. Yet even when the preach 'justice for all' you will rarely ever see contemporary feminists fighting for rights of transgenders, intersex, hermaphrodite and so on forth. This is because they take the movement too literally and only interpret "a woman being assaulted/deprived" as a breach of feminism which in fact is both hypocritical and counterproductive. No movement that has something so fundamental as its NAME coined in a particular gender such as Fem(ale)inism can ever hope to achieve equality. We don't need black people rights, we don't need gay people rights, we don't need woman rights, we just need human rights. There is no reason for you, a human being, to be deprived of ANY rights regardless of your race/gender/sexual orientation. All humans deserve, dare I say 'equal rights'.

Feminism embraces victimhood: If women really are as strong and independent that feminism makes them out to be (which I'm sure they truly are) then why must they consistently play the victim? Instead of being strong and tackling obstacles for what they are. This paradox makes the moment fall flat on its face, opening questions to the irony behind its core principles. The movement deludes these women into thinking they are oppressed even when they aren't, which is the exact opposite of what the movement fights for. This is best exemplified by the fact that women only fight for aspects where they are deprived and things that don't benefit them and never about the privileges they have as a woman. Did you ever hear feminists outraging about men paying for their dates, opening doors for them, having reserved seat in buses, the ability to resist political arrest at night, not being forced to be recruited in the army in several countries where it is the government's right to coerce individuals into joining the military?

Embraces bad health: Thanks to feminism, the fat acceptance movement has taken a hold of society. Telling someone that they’re beautiful even if they’re obese, is not only a dangerous idea to be promoting to kids, but also promotes and perpetuates bad health. Being obese has several implications on health. Heart disease, diabetes, stroke, cancer and many more severe sicknesses have been linked to obesity and trivializing it is very dangerous to society and vulnerable minds.

I could honestly go on forever about how silly Feminism is in the modern world with their slut walks to "prevent rape" and "glitter pits", "man spreading", "free the nipple" but dear lord that would take forever for there are simply too many flaws.

~Thankyou.

Reply 335

Governah

I mean, aren't we all?