The Student Room Logo
This thread is closed

Being rejected by Oxbridge

Scroll to see replies

err...based on what? too much free time? amazing....havingg so much free time :smile:
valeryblack
err...based on what? too much free time? amazing....havingg so much free time :smile:


Based on 40 criteria

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6359363.stm

The UK has been accused of failing its children, as it comes bottom of a league table for child well-being across 21 industrialised countries.

Unicef looked at 40 indicators from the years 2000-2003 including poverty, family relationships, and health.

One of the report's authors told the BBC that under-investment and a "dog-eat-dog" society were to blame for Britain's poor performance.

The government says its policies have helped to improve child welfare.


In its league table the Netherlands came top, followed by Sweden, Denmark and Finland.

Unicef UK executive director David Bull said all the countries had weaknesses that needed to be addressed.

"By comparing the performance of countries we see what is possible with a commitment to supporting every child to fulfil his or her full potential," he said.

'Dog-eat-dog society'

The authors say they used the most up-to-date information to assess "whether children feel loved, cherished, special and supported, within the family and community, and whether the family and community are being supported in this task by public policy and resources".

CHILD WELL-BEING TABLE
1. Netherlands
2. Sweden
3. Denmark
4. Finland
5. Spain
6. Switzerland
7. Norway
8. Italy
9. Republic of Ireland
10. Belgium
11. Germany
12. Canada
13. Greece
14. Poland
15. Czech Republic
16. France
17. Portugal
18. Austria
19. Hungary
20. United States
21. United Kingdom
well, put it this way. my country isn't even in that top :biggrin: and, no matter how much Germany deserves the 11th place i would never live there (no offence to germans here).
but it's good to know. thanks :smile:
Any chance we can keep this Oxbridge-related? :smile:
oh, right, sorry :biggrin:
I think I'm gonna be quite devastated if(when) I get rejected because I stupidly put too much work into Cambridge, read the prospectus over and over and looked at what current medical research they were doing etc.
And also the fact that all of my friends, volunteer workmates and even my hairdresser are really excited about it and are like "OH WOW!!! YOU WILL DEFO GET IN WITH THOSE GRADES!!" They don't appreciate just how good you have to be to get in and that I'm incredibly average compared to fellow applicants.

Had the interviews and one was quite disastrous so it's only just reinforced my belief that I will get rejected.

First week of January will be a bad week, but after that recovery period, everything will all work out fine!!! Besides, rejection for me, will only make me even more determined to get in somewhere else.
Positive thinking dear, positive thinking....
Reply 187
peachylife

And also the fact that all of my friends, volunteer workmates and even my hairdresser are really excited about it and are like "OH WOW!!! YOU WILL DEFO GET IN WITH THOSE GRADES!!" They don't appreciate just how good you have to be to get in and that I'm incredibly average compared to fellow applicants.


I'm in the same boat as you. I really hate it when people roll their eyes when I say I'm worried about my application to Oxford, as though I simply want to get an ego-boost and confirmation that I'm clever.
Naranoc
I'm in the same boat as you. I really hate it when people roll their eyes when I say I'm worried about my application to Oxford, as though I simply want to get an ego-boost and confirmation that I'm clever.

Completely agree with you.
People really have no idea how much of a lottery and how difficult it is to get in. Statistically chances are slim for some of the more competitve courses.
^ you're all so right. As much as I take it as a compliment, I don't like people thinking that I can definitely get in. It'd make it even worse when I got rejected, quite frankly...
Angelil
Apropos Headstart: isn't that a programme for little kiddies? I thought it was for primary school kids.
*goes to wikipedia*
I'm thinking of the wrong thing. Head Start is a US programme founded by Lyndon Johnson to assist low-income families. Sure Start is what I was thinking of - it has the aim of giving children the best possible start in life by assisting low-income families through the improvement of childcare, early education, health and family support.
So in answer to the question of whether we have anything like Head Start in the UK: not as such, but when you apply for your student loan it's assessed on the income of your parents, so if they earn relatively little, then you'll be entitled to the maximum loan available. If you're still struggling then you can usually apply to your university for further funds such as grants or scholarships, and there are probably non-government external organisations that also do this.



i thought the head start people were referring to was the scheme where you spend a week at a uni doing sample lectures etc?

as for people thinking you're a cert to get in... a friend was trying to set me up and told the guy i was going to oxford next year. so i then had to explain that i was only applying, actually :\ it's one thing to have people tell you you're a dead cert to get in, but it's all the more embarrassing having to explain to people that no, someone got it wrong, you're not GOING there, you're just applying there.
Pippaaa
i thought the head start people were referring to was the scheme where you spend a week at a uni doing sample lectures etc?

as for people thinking you're a cert to get in... a friend was trying to set me up and told the guy i was going to oxford next year. so i then had to explain that i was only applying, actually :\ it's one thing to have people tell you you're a dead cert to get in, but it's all the more embarrassing having to explain to people that no, someone got it wrong, you're not GOING there, you're just applying there.

I've given up telling people that I'm applying. To any questions about unis, I simply say what subject I wish to study and hopefully I should hear some news in the next few months...
I've had way too many awkward conversations about uni applications! :redface:
Good idea sugar cane!

I try to burrow cambridge in the middle of saying my choices in the hope that they don't notice.
BeetleBum
Good idea sugar cane!

I try to burrow cambridge in the middle of saying my choices in the hope that they don't notice.

Thanks :smile:
Yeh, for a while I tried putting Oxford last, but that put too much emphasis on it and then they said "are you trying to hide it?!?"
So I started putting it in the middle of my five choices...now...it's easier to not say a word :smile:
Reply 194
I'm in the same boat. I generally don't mention to people that i'm applying to Oxford, but when i do, you know you've won my respect :cool: :adore: Isn't that cool? :biggrin:
Naranoc
I'm in the same boat as you. I really hate it when people roll their eyes when I say I'm worried about my application to Oxford, as though I simply want to get an ego-boost and confirmation that I'm clever.


Completely agree! The vast majority of my friends at school (and most of the teachers, in fact) seem to think that getting into Oxbridge would be a walk in a park if you have good grades. I explain to them that there's a lot more to the admissions process than mere grades alone, almost everyone has the same kind of academic track records etc......... but they don't understand!

I also know what you mean about trying not to say Oxbridge first when mentioning my choices. When I'm asked these days I tend to say "oh, I'm applying to Imperial, UCL, Bristol, Edinburgh, and.... oh hang on, I need to go" or something like that :p:
lol.

Wise :smile:
Reply 197
i wont mind if i dont get in, i know that i am clever enough for oxford and am ridiculously passionate about history but my grades arent really anything special. theyre quite below average for an oxford applicant.

i will be a bit upset if i get rejected before interview though. to go from getting in last year to not even progressing past sitting the HAT will really errr get my goat, as it were.

i dont think i did very well on the HAT though. ive just got this feeling.

anyway yeah, shouldnt have got in last year probably and will probably have a heart attack if i do get in this year. i really dont expect to.
at_amber
i wont mind if i dont get in, i know that i am clever enough for oxford and am ridiculously passionate about history but my grades arent really anything special. theyre quite below average for an oxford applicant.

i will be a bit upset if i get rejected before interview though. to go from getting in last year to not even progressing past sitting the HAT will really errr get my goat, as it were.

i dont think i did very well on the HAT though. ive just got this feeling.

anyway yeah, shouldnt have got in last year probably and will probably have a heart attack if i do get in this year. i really dont expect to.


You are basically voicing how I feel about it all. Have adored History since forever, reasonably clever :redface: AS grades not that brill compared to other people's. I Scraped a C in chemistry- got a D in 1 module although did get As in History,French and Biology. I also went to ****ty state school so possess absolutely no "training" as such...and think my HAT was a bit lame, though written work, (I should also imagine references) and PS were pretty OK. Hmmmm....:hmmm:

____________


"Ce qui m'a pas tué ma rendu plus fort."
Neitzsche
Reply 199
I have no doubt that I'm smart enough for Oxbridge.

Whether I'm the Oxbridge kind of person is a different story. I guess I'll have to find out.

I, however, highly doubt that I'm going to get a place.

Is it crazy to be imagining Oxbridge admission officers combing these sites, looking for potential candidates.

Because if so, I caught you, and you so need to offer me a place now.