# A metal has tensile strength...

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

A Metal has tensile strength value of 50N/m^2 and an elastic limit value of 210N/m^2.

A wire made from this metal is used to support a 10kg mass. If the cross-sectional area of the wire is 0.002m^2 :-

Calculate the force on the wire:

Multiple choice but working would be helpful!

4 answer choices:

- 160kg

- 7N

- 98.1N

- 66N

A wire made from this metal is used to support a 10kg mass. If the cross-sectional area of the wire is 0.002m^2 :-

Calculate the force on the wire:

Multiple choice but working would be helpful!

4 answer choices:

- 160kg

- 7N

- 98.1N

- 66N

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

A Metal has tensile strength value of 50N/m^2 and an elastic limit value of 210N/m^2.

A wire made from this metal is used to support a 10kg mass. If the cross-sectional area of the wire is 0.002m^2 :-

Calculate the force on the wire:

Multiple choice but working would be helpful!

4 answer choices:

- 160kg

- 7N

- 98.1N

- 66N

**Bysteven**)A Metal has tensile strength value of 50N/m^2 and an elastic limit value of 210N/m^2.

A wire made from this metal is used to support a 10kg mass. If the cross-sectional area of the wire is 0.002m^2 :-

Calculate the force on the wire:

Multiple choice but working would be helpful!

4 answer choices:

- 160kg

- 7N

- 98.1N

- 66N

Your units look wrong for tensile strength and elastic limit. Are you missing a 'M', or were they per ? Why is the tensile strength less than the elastic limit? Is one Young's modulus?

What is the weight of the mass?

Has the elastic limit been reached? If not, how much of the weight will be supported?

0

reply

(Original post by

We don't give full solutions, but will help point you in the right direction.

Your units look wrong for tensile strength and elastic limit. Are you missing a 'M', or were they per ? Why is the tensile strength less than the elastic limit? Is one Young's modulus?

What is the weight of the mass?

Has the elastic limit been reached? If not, how much of the weight will be supported?

**RogerOxon**)We don't give full solutions, but will help point you in the right direction.

Your units look wrong for tensile strength and elastic limit. Are you missing a 'M', or were they per ? Why is the tensile strength less than the elastic limit? Is one Young's modulus?

What is the weight of the mass?

Has the elastic limit been reached? If not, how much of the weight will be supported?

Thanks for the help

0

reply

Report

#4

(Original post by

Fairly certain that's all the information I was given, it's thrown me off too.. https://gyazo.com/55543551dd15333001d8a718ebdffdcc

Thanks for the help

**Bysteven**)Fairly certain that's all the information I was given, it's thrown me off too.. https://gyazo.com/55543551dd15333001d8a718ebdffdcc

Thanks for the help

It asks for the Force acting and F=ma

0

reply

Report

#5

**Bysteven**)

A Metal has tensile strength value of 50N/m^2 and an elastic limit value of 210N/m^2.

A wire made from this metal is used to support a 10kg mass. If the cross-sectional area of the wire is 0.002m^2 :-

Calculate the force on the wire:

Multiple choice but working would be helpful!

4 answer choices:

- 160kg

- 7N

- 98.1N

- 66N

0

reply

I honestly have no idea so I'm going with the option of using F = ma 10kg * 9.81, then using Stress = F/A for part B which is calculate the stress of the wire. No idea why the extraneous information is there for as it's confusing me between elastic regioning, even though the question asks no such thing.

https://gyazo.com/98e3ecaf9d976cf98f4b033f097339b2

https://gyazo.com/98e3ecaf9d976cf98f4b033f097339b2

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

I honestly have no idea so I'm going with the option of using F = ma 10kg * 9.81, then using Stress = F/A for part B which is calculate the stress of the wire. No idea why the extraneous information is there for as it's confusing me between elastic regioning, even though the question asks no such thing.

https://gyazo.com/98e3ecaf9d976cf98f4b033f097339b2

**Bysteven**)I honestly have no idea so I'm going with the option of using F = ma 10kg * 9.81, then using Stress = F/A for part B which is calculate the stress of the wire. No idea why the extraneous information is there for as it's confusing me between elastic regioning, even though the question asks no such thing.

https://gyazo.com/98e3ecaf9d976cf98f4b033f097339b2

As it is, the wire breaks. The answer that I think they want is just the weight of the mass (mg).

0

reply

(Original post by

The question is plain wrong - the units are nuts. They should be in or . I think that they meant the elastic modulus and not limit too. The elastic limit can't be above the tensile strength.

As it is, the wire breaks. The answer that I think they want is just the weight of the mass (mg).

**RogerOxon**)The question is plain wrong - the units are nuts. They should be in or . I think that they meant the elastic modulus and not limit too. The elastic limit can't be above the tensile strength.

As it is, the wire breaks. The answer that I think they want is just the weight of the mass (mg).

0

reply

Report

#9

The question isn't wrong, nor is it nuts. It provides you with extraneous data. As stated in the OP, the question asks:

"Calculate the force on the wire".

Stresses, and cross-sectional areas are irrelevent.

F = ma = mg = 10x9.81 = 98.1 N

"Calculate the force on the wire".

Stresses, and cross-sectional areas are irrelevent.

F = ma = mg = 10x9.81 = 98.1 N

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

The question isn't wrong, nor is it nuts. It provides you with extraneous data. As stated in the OP, the question asks:

"Calculate the force on the wire".

**Illgesi**)The question isn't wrong, nor is it nuts. It provides you with extraneous data. As stated in the OP, the question asks:

"Calculate the force on the wire".

The wire cannot support the weight given, so part of it will accelerate downwards with the weight.

The yield stress specified is below the elastic limit. There is no material where that is the case. They appear to be quoting Young's (/ elastic) modulus, not limit.

The claimed values are 6 orders of magnitude off the values for steel. I doubt that there's a metal with those values - they look to have been wanting values for steel, but missed by a (small) factor of one million.

(Original post by

Stresses, and cross-sectional areas are irrelevent.

**Illgesi**)Stresses, and cross-sectional areas are irrelevent.

I agree that they're simply after the weight, but, if the wire breaks, it wouldn't be that. With the values given, the wire is history.

0

reply

Report

#11

That looks like giving too much info to confuse and they just want f=ma with force as gravity.

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

Yes, it is.

The wire cannot support the weight given, so part of it will accelerate downwards with the weight.

The yield stress specified is below the elastic limit. There is no material where that is the case. They appear to be quoting Young's (/ elastic) modulus, not limit.

The claimed values are 6 orders of magnitude off the values for steel. I doubt that there's a metal with those values - they look to have been wanting values for steel, but missed by a (small) factor of one million.

**RogerOxon**)Yes, it is.

The wire cannot support the weight given, so part of it will accelerate downwards with the weight.

The yield stress specified is below the elastic limit. There is no material where that is the case. They appear to be quoting Young's (/ elastic) modulus, not limit.

The claimed values are 6 orders of magnitude off the values for steel. I doubt that there's a metal with those values - they look to have been wanting values for steel, but missed by a (small) factor of one million.

*supporting*...' the mass. So however instantaneously, the entire weight of the object is applied to the wire.

If the wire breaks, what is the force on "the" wire?

I agree that they're simply after the weight, but, if the wire breaks, it wouldn't be that. With the values given, the wire is history.

I agree that they're simply after the weight, but, if the wire breaks, it wouldn't be that. With the values given, the wire is history.

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top