Turn on thread page Beta

Do you support fox hunting becoming legal again in The UK? watch

  • View Poll Results: Do you think fox hunting should be legal again in The UK?
    No - the ban should stay
    122
    81.33%
    Yes - it should be legal again
    24
    16.00%
    Unsure
    4
    2.67%

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    So I read today in the news that Theresa May wants to bring back fox hunting and plans to give MPs a chance to vote on the matter.

    What are your views on this? Do you believe the ban should stay in place or that it should become legal again? Why?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Spock's Socks)
    So I read today in the news that Theresa May wants to bring back fox hunting and plans to give MPs a chance to vote on the matter.

    What are your views on this? Do you believe the ban should stay in place or that it should become legal again? Why?
    I'm very against it. Does she even have a reason?

    I remember talking about it for a speech in year 7 English class, as we had to talk about something we were against (Someone told me afterwards that it was illegal anyway, but hey-ho).

    What they do is shoot a fox and throw them into a pack of dogs or something. Pretty inhumane stuff
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    No, we've been getting along fine without it. It's unneccessary.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Hopson97)
    I'm very against it. Does she even have a reason?

    I remember talking about it for a speech in year 7 English class, as we had to talk about something we were against (Someone told me afterwards that it was illegal anyway, but hey-ho).

    What they do is shoot a fox and throw them into a pack of dogs or something. Pretty inhumane stuff
    I am against it too. I don't know many people who do support it. I haven't yet read any reason for her decision other than this quote - "As it happens, personally I have always been in favour of fox hunting, and we maintain our commitment, we have had a commitment previously as a Conservative Party, to allow a free vote."
    • Community Assistant
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Friffinghell)
    No, we've been getting along fine without it. It's unneccessary.
    Most thing are unnecessary, something being unnecessary is not a reason to ban it, nor is not liking it
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Never. Shooting animals for fun is so cowardly.

    Only time it's acceptable in my opinion is when farmers need to protect their livestock then they can hunt them on their property.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I agree. Blood sports do not provide anything useful other than to allow humans to commit so called justifiable suffering on a living creature.
    There is no reason to legalise it again
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    100% against it. Tbh if I could vote this is a game changer for me.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I understand the rural community saying the number of foxes should be controlled. But there's a way to do it. What makes me uncomfortable about fox hunting is the fact they make such a bloody big deal of it and enjoy it. Shoot them in the head or set poison down for them[ although that might kill other animals too, so perhaps not a great suggestion]. It's not that they are actually killed that I have a problem with. We kill cows and pigs and sheep in their millions every year for our dinner table. But the cows, pigs and sheep are not hunted and then ripped apart while still alive; while the people forcing the dogs to do this are thoroughly enjoying themselves. That's sick.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    Most thing are unnecessary, something being unnecessary is not a reason to ban it, nor is not liking it
    The question posed is "do you support it".
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    When it first happened I was in favour of the ban. But I came to realise it was more a spiteful desire on my part against toffs.

    I don't remotely support hunting and killing a fox for fun. But as an omnivore, it would be hypocritical of me to protest it while still eating animals.

    I think mine and most other people's contempt of fox hunting is derived from just disliking toffs in general and wanting a law to spite them.

    Frankly, there are bigger issues than foxes being hunted. I might not like the idea of hunting and killing an animal for sport, but then I like eating animals so who am I to judge.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jammy Duel)
    Most thing are unnecessary, something being unnecessary is not a reason to ban it, nor is not liking it
    It was banned on the basis of animal cruelty. Post-ban there has been no side effects. No notable increase in 'vermin'.

    So the non-sporting justifications for it were unfounded.

    Just because somebody likes something doesn't mean it's a valid choice either.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    If the number of foxes in an area is too high and it's affecting the habitat then it's fine. Otherwise not.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Yes I support it, as long as no endangered species are hunted and it's done sustainably.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Yes it's good, it's a tradition that many people enjoy and it doesn't really harm anyone except the foxes so it's not a big deal. I don't have a problem with it at all, especially since I don't really like foxes and they a real more of a pest than a pet
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    The fox population needs to be controlled and if anyone tries to argue against that then they need to spend a few weeks out in the countryside looking after any sort of domestic animal, including pets, when there are lots of foxes about.
    The only method currently available is shooting, having been out shooting foxes, getting a clear shot where the fox dies in one shot is difficult and more often then not you end up following a trail of blood which sometimes leads to a dead fox but more often than not, no fox as it ends up staggering about for up to a day or two whilst the wound gets worse or it dies of starvation unable to catch food.
    Fox hunting on the other hand is quick, yes the fox has to be chased and caught but that at least gives it the chance to get away unharmed, which it frequently would if it's strong and healthy. If on the other hand it is caught, the hounds kill it instantly or it goes to ground and is dug up/chased out so a clean shot with a gun kills it. If I was a fox I'd take my chances with the hounds any day over a gun.
    As for only the idea only posh people hunt, anyone who has been to a hunt meet knows that poeple from all walks of life go, including people who have to save up to be able to afford to hire a horse occasionally throughout the season.
    If it was purely about killing foxes then hunting would of died out with the ban, but it hasn't, so why not let the hounds do a job they were bred for and kill the fox as part of a pest control programme, and then a few fewer foxes would suffer a horrendous death at the end of a gun.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Seems a bit unnecessary to repeal the act - fox hunting is still legal as long as you don't intentionally have the dog kill the fox. At the same time if you're still going to allow fox hunting why not allow the dogs to kill them


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Spock's Socks)
    So I read today in the news that Theresa May wants to bring back fox hunting and plans to give MPs a chance to vote on the matter.

    What are your views on this? Do you believe the ban should stay in place or that it should become legal again? Why?
    Killing animals for sport isn't fair but culling them is. I can support fox culling but not hunting; are foxes even that numerous to be culled?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    Im very against it.

    TBH its a "sport" for the rich folk, the majority of the public are against it im sure, though they wont get a say in the matter lolo
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I'm not sure I know enough about it to take a position, although my own natural inclination would be to allow people to carry on with whatever they've been doing, and I wouldn't ban hunting for sport in general, especially where there's some justification for it such as keeping numbers under control.

    On the other hand, I don't think most people who are against it know a whole lot about it, either. A lot of people are either in it because it's fashionable to oppose it or because they have a vague idea that it's for the rich, and the rich should be stopped (presumably they'd also ban polo and croquet).
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: June 13, 2017
Poll
Is the Big Bang theory correct?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.