The Student Room Group
Reply 1
Show us you're working. I havent entirely worked through it but u = x dv = secx and doing by parts twice might work.
Reply 2
My scanner isn't working, but when I tried it by parts, couldn't go further because the integration of log (secx+tanx) came up.

I didn't understand your substitution of u = x dv = secx.
Reply 3
Fire Wolf
I didn't understand your substitution of u = x dv = secx.

It wasn't a substitution, it was by parts udv=uvvdu\int udv=uv-\int vdu (where u and v are functions of x).

That said, mathematica gave me an answer that cannot be expressed in elementary functions, so I suspect something is wrong with the question...
(if a DE, check your working up to coming to having to integrate xsecx...)
Reply 4
No it doesnt work, just actually tried it now.

Might want to check your DE.
Reply 5
ar after some research...

this question is doable by parts
the hard part is to integrate sec x.
the reason why its very hard to integrate it is because its so hard that it is actually provided in (at least for mine) the official formula list.
just for refernce to all,
integration of sec x is ln |sec x + tan x |
But it's xsecx you asked for :s:
Reply 7
yea but after integrting by part, there is a need to integrate sec x.
Reply 8
OCC++
yea but after integrting by part, there is a need to integrate sec x.

Yes, but the thing that causes the real problem is sec(x)dx\int\int\sec(x)dx
OCC++
yea but after integrting by part, there is a need to integrate sec x.


Which is a standard result we all know...
calcium878
Which is a standard result we all know...

... and be able to derive:p: