Ocr as law sources of law predictions? Watch

Idris-
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
What is your prediction on what is going to come up on the G152 sources of law paper ?
0
reply
SofiaTW
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#2
Report 1 year ago
#2
Our teacher believes judicial precedent is likely to come up

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
hxrrvey
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 year ago
#3
Judicial precedent + acts of parliament and EU law
1
reply
SofiaTW
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#4
Report 1 year ago
#4
When you said acts of parliament do you mean legislation?
1
reply
OM4R
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#5
Report 1 year ago
#5
I predict legislation & sources of law or Judicial Precedent!
0
reply
Alt_42
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#6
Report 1 year ago
#6
(Original post by Idris-)
What is your prediction on what is going to come up on the G152 sources of law paper ?
If Precedent doesn't come up for the 4th year in a row i think i may just leave the country
1
reply
SethMtv
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 year ago
#7
(Original post by Alt_42)
If Precedent doesn't come up for the 4th year in a row i think i may just leave the country
Unlucky mate.
0
reply
Alt_42
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#8
Report 1 year ago
#8
(Original post by SethMtv)
Unlucky mate.
Tell me about it, statutory interpretation for the fourth year in a row, i was re-sitting to improve my C just gonna have to do well in my g153 and 4
0
reply
SethMtv
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#9
Report 1 year ago
#9
(Original post by Alt_42)
Tell me about it, statutory interpretation for the fourth year in a row, i was re-sitting to improve my C just gonna have to do well in my g153 and 4
Rah that's deep, you can't even resit. I was planning my resit the second i opened that question booklet.
0
reply
Idris-
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#10
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#10
(Original post by zainkiani)
my college didn't teach us EU law and poorly taught statutory interpretations, so our whole year and upper year resits got screwed, just wanted to know what your college didn't teach because apparently each college just doesn't teach one topic?
my college didnt teach EU law either for the 3 5 mark questions what was your answers intrinsic aids or extrinsic?
0
reply
2025
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#11
Report 1 year ago
#11
(Original post by Idris-)
my college didnt teach EU law either for the 3 5 mark questions what was your answers intrinsic aids or extrinsic?
You needed to state what type of intrinsic or extrinsic aids. The first 5 marker was hansard (extrinsic aid), the second one was previous case law (extrinsic aid)-for this one you could also use intrinsic aids such as preamble long titles and short titles of previous case law to find out what was contained in the consolidating statute, and the third one was law reform reports such as from the royal or law commission (extrinsic aid).

So unhappy judicial precedent didn't come up though but thankfully i realized i could use some similar evaluation in cii) when the source mentioned the mischief rule resulting in judicial law making.
0
reply
2025
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#12
Report 1 year ago
#12
(Original post by Alt_42)
Tell me about it, statutory interpretation for the fourth year in a row, i was re-sitting to improve my C just gonna have to do well in my g153 and 4
Same. I was resitting to improve my grade C as well. Was told there's little chance precedent won't be on the paper. However I didn't think the paper was all that bad as I had been using stat cases for synoptic links in the G154 paper, so the mischief rule was the only question that went horribly wrong (only included one case, the source, and 3 points)
0
reply
2025
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#13
Report 1 year ago
#13
(Original post by SethMtv)
Rah that's deep, you can't even resit. I was planning my resit the second i opened that question booklet.
What do you reckon the grade boundaries will be for sources of law.

I reckon:
A-49
B-43
C-37
0
reply
Idris-
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#14
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#14
(Original post by 2025)
You needed to state what type of intrinsic or extrinsic aids. The first 5 marker was hansard (extrinsic aid), the second one was previous case law (extrinsic aid)-for this one you could also use intrinsic aids such as preamble long titles and short titles of previous case law to find out what was contained in the consolidating statute, and the third one was law reform reports such as from the royal or law commission (extrinsic aid).

So unhappy judicial precedent didn't come up though but thankfully i realized i could use some similar evaluation in cii) when the source mentioned the mischief rule resulting in judicial law making.
so for the 2nd 5 marker could you also state it was an intrinsic aid
0
reply
2025
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#15
Report 1 year ago
#15
(Original post by Idris-)
so for the 2nd 5 marker could you also state it was an intrinsic aid
The mark scheme may allow this with valid justification because the judge wanted to find out more about a consolidating statute so could look for features within the statute.

However this was the most appropriate way to go about the 2nd 5 marker ; first i stated that an extrinsic aid of previous case law should be used (this was the critical point=3 marks), then I stated this is because a consolidating statute is a number of Acts of parliament compiled into one Act so these acts could be researched individually (this is the reason "why"), then I stated that intrinsic aids such as preamble, long titles, short titles etc could be used within the previous case law to grasp the context of what would be in the consolidating statute (this would be a further elaboration point which would achieve the final mark).

Hope this helps
1
reply
Idris-
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#16
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#16
(Original post by 2025)
The mark scheme may allow this with valid justification because the judge wanted to find out more about a consolidating statute so could look for features within the statute.

However this was the most appropriate way to go about the 2nd 5 marker ; first i stated that an extrinsic aid of previous case law should be used (this was the critical point=3 marks), then I stated this is because a consolidating statute is a number of Acts of parliament compiled into one Act so these acts could be researched individually (this is the reason "why", then I stated that intrinsic aids such as preamble, long titles, short titles etc could be used within the previous case law to grasp the context of what would be in the consolidating statute (this would be a further elaboration point which would achieve the final mark).

Hope this helps
so would i only get one mark for saying it was an intrinsic aid and why
0
reply
2025
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#17
Report 1 year ago
#17
(Original post by Idris-)
so would i only get one mark for saying it was an intrinsic aid and why
I think you could get two marks

search this link :

http://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/235895-...f-law-june.pdf


This is a mark scheme which has similar 5 mark questions. For level 1 you can state any basic relevant point and get 2 marks and as you've stated an intrinsic aid this would equal one mark and why equals a further mark, so you've probably got 2 marks on that question. don't forget the 5 markers are only a small percentage of the paper. hope this helps
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • Edge Hill University
    Undergraduate and Postgraduate - Campus Tour Undergraduate
    Mon, 18 Feb '19
  • University of the Arts London
    MA Innovation Management Open Day Postgraduate
    Mon, 18 Feb '19
  • University of Roehampton
    Department of Media, Culture and Language; School of Education; Business School Undergraduate
    Tue, 19 Feb '19

Do you give blood?

Yes (33)
11.07%
I used to but I don't now (10)
3.36%
No, but I want to start (111)
37.25%
No, I am unable to (64)
21.48%
No, I chose not to (80)
26.85%

Watched Threads

View All