Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter

    I was wondering what would be a better approach to structuring my 30/20 marker essays in my classics exam: for example, To what extent do you agree that the treatment of the drapery is essential to portraying the female figure in Greek sculpture of the 6th, 5th, and 4th centuries BC?

    Should i go through each sculpture and explain?
    P1: Berlin Kore
    P2: Knidian Aphordite
    P3: etc

    Or should I go by point?
    P1: Decoration and surface patterning : Berlin kore and peplos kore
    P2: Accentuation of the anatomy: Pedimental sculpture on the Parthenon
    P3: etc

    I get that it can also depend on the question and sometimes its just better to go through each sculpture or temple but it makes sense to go by point rather than sculpture?? Also how much detail should I include? Only what is relevant to the question or would extra score me more?

    If you have any other structures it would really help me to explore them!!
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: May 19, 2017
“Yanny” or “Laurel”

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.