# Binomial expansion

Watch
I've come across this equation from the formula booklet:

Now I haven't actually been this taught this in school and with the exam on wednesday that's not looking too good.

Is there any resources anywhere where it actually teaches this? I'm unsure where to go. I know how to do the normal binomial expansion where the n has an integer. Thanks

Now I haven't actually been this taught this in school and with the exam on wednesday that's not looking too good.

Is there any resources anywhere where it actually teaches this? I'm unsure where to go. I know how to do the normal binomial expansion where the n has an integer. Thanks

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

I've come across this equation from the formula booklet:

Now I haven't actually been this taught this in school and with the exam on wednesday that's not looking too good.

Is there any resources anywhere where it actually teaches this? I'm unsure where to go. I know how to do the normal binomial expansion where the n has an integer. Thanks

**SunnyBoys**)I've come across this equation from the formula booklet:

Now I haven't actually been this taught this in school and with the exam on wednesday that's not looking too good.

Is there any resources anywhere where it actually teaches this? I'm unsure where to go. I know how to do the normal binomial expansion where the n has an integer. Thanks

You don't need to use it.

0

reply

Report

#3

this isn't needed for c2, don't worry. the same formula booklet is used for all modules thats why it's in there.

0

reply

(Original post by

this isn't needed for c2, don't worry. the same formula booklet is used for all modules thats why it's in there.

**imundercover**)this isn't needed for c2, don't worry. the same formula booklet is used for all modules thats why it's in there.

0

reply

Report

#5

The Edexcel formula book lists this under C2, so is this formula required for C2 Edexcel maths?

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

The Edexcel formula book lists this under C2, so is this formula required for C2 Edexcel maths?

**Tommy59375**)The Edexcel formula book lists this under C2, so is this formula required for C2 Edexcel maths?

0

reply

Report

#7

However OP I've done most if not all the past papers and i've only ever seen 1 question (the mock paper) need this. It's unlikely that it comes up.

0

reply

Report

#8

(Original post by

I'm afraid he does need it. I thought they didn't use this in C2 but the Mock paper they created this year has a question where this way of working it out is needed. Did it earlier, was kind of surprised.

However OP I've done most if not all the past papers and i've only ever seen 1 question (the mock paper) need this. It's unlikely that it comes up.

**NotKidding**)I'm afraid he does need it. I thought they didn't use this in C2 but the Mock paper they created this year has a question where this way of working it out is needed. Did it earlier, was kind of surprised.

However OP I've done most if not all the past papers and i've only ever seen 1 question (the mock paper) need this. It's unlikely that it comes up.

0

reply

Report

#9

(Original post by

Can I see the question?

**RDKGames**)Can I see the question?

It's Q7

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

The binomial formula is the one above, but there is a much more simplified version for when the exponent is a natural number, and that's the one you use for C2.

**RDKGames**)The binomial formula is the one above, but there is a much more simplified version for when the exponent is a natural number, and that's the one you use for C2.

Yes but the problem is in the Edexcel formula book,

- a^n + nC1 a^(n-1) b + nC2 a^(n-2) b^2 + ... + nCr a^(n-r) b^r + ... + b^n (n E N)

AND

- (1+X)^n = 1 + nX + (n(n-1)X^2)/(1x2) + ... + (n(n-1)...(n-r+1)X^r)/(1x2x...xr) (abs(X) < 1, n E R)

both of these are listed under C2.

Are you saying one of the formula given for C2 is not required for C2? Surely in this case it should be listed on the C4 page?

[sorry for lack of formatting, the toolbar did not come up for some reason]

0

reply

Report

#11

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

Yes but the problem is in the Edexcel formula book,

- a^n + nC1 a^(n-1) b + nC2 a^(n-2) b^2 + ... + nCr a^(n-r) b^r + ... + b^n (n E N)

AND

- (1+X)^n = 1 + nX + (n(n-1)X^2)/(1x2) + ... + (n(n-1)...(n-r+1)X^r)/(1x2x...xr) (abs(X) < 1, n E R)

both of these are listed under C2.

Are you saying one of the formula given for C2 is not required for C2? Surely in this case it should be listed on the C4 page?

[sorry for lack of formatting, the toolbar did not come up for some reason]

**Tommy59375**)Yes but the problem is in the Edexcel formula book,

- a^n + nC1 a^(n-1) b + nC2 a^(n-2) b^2 + ... + nCr a^(n-r) b^r + ... + b^n (n E N)

AND

- (1+X)^n = 1 + nX + (n(n-1)X^2)/(1x2) + ... + (n(n-1)...(n-r+1)X^r)/(1x2x...xr) (abs(X) < 1, n E R)

both of these are listed under C2.

Are you saying one of the formula given for C2 is not required for C2? Surely in this case it should be listed on the C4 page?

[sorry for lack of formatting, the toolbar did not come up for some reason]

To answer whether you need it or not for C2, I'm tagging someone who can confirm notnek, so any questions regarding that you can ask him. You can certainly use it for C2, but in C2 the exponent is always a natural number so you can use the simplified version.

0

reply

Report

#13

(Original post by

At quick glance, clearly you can use the C2 formula because you're told is a positive integer - ie a natural number.

**RDKGames**)At quick glance, clearly you can use the C2 formula because you're told is a positive integer - ie a natural number.

How exactly are you able to use the first formula? You don't know what n is so you can't use the nCr button, and it's a disaster to use nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!) from the formula book.

We were taught to use the second formula (supposedly C4) to do this sort of question.

0

reply

Report

#14

(Original post by

How exactly are you able to use the first formula? You don't know what n is so you can't use the nCr button, and it's a disaster to use nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!) from the formula book.

We were taught to use the second formula (supposedly C4) to do this sort of question.

**Tommy59375**)How exactly are you able to use the first formula? You don't know what n is so you can't use the nCr button, and it's a disaster to use nCr = n!/(r!(n-r)!) from the formula book.

We were taught to use the second formula (supposedly C4) to do this sort of question.

Coefficient of is

Coefficient of is

Equate the two:

Divide by leaves you with

Now and

Rewrite it:

Multiply through by

Took me less than 4 mins, and I'm not even sure if the examiner would've given you the marks for using the C4 formula as this tests your understand of the factorial notation, but notnek can tell confirm/deny that.

0

reply

Report

#15

(Original post by

Not really a disaster.

Coefficient of is

Coefficient of is

Equate the two:

Divide by leaves you with

Now and

Rewrite it:

Multiply through by

Took me less than 4 mins, and I'm not even sure if the examiner would've given you the marks for using the C4 formula as this tests your understand of the factorial notation, but notnek can tell confirm/deny that.

**RDKGames**)Not really a disaster.

Coefficient of is

Coefficient of is

Equate the two:

Divide by leaves you with

Now and

Rewrite it:

Multiply through by

Took me less than 4 mins, and I'm not even sure if the examiner would've given you the marks for using the C4 formula as this tests your understand of the factorial notation, but notnek can tell confirm/deny that.

Thanks for that, I'd not have thought of doing it like that... when I say "disaster" I meant, it was when I tried! I don't think they could rightfully withold marks because you didn't use the "right" method though -- there are usually more than one way to get to the right answer and if you've used a valid formula there's nothing wrong. They would have to say "Using the so and so formula..." in the question wouldn't they? For example, it's allowed to use y-y1=m(x-x1) at GCSE, although not expected, and in C1 AP questions, and C2 GP questions you're allowed to list out all the terms and add them, instead of just using the Sn formula.

0

reply

Report

#16

pretty sure you can use either

the ncr formula - you can use for positive integers

the binomial formula for ALL values

http://www.examsolutions.net/tutoria...=C2&topic=1308

the ncr formula - you can use for positive integers

the binomial formula for ALL values

http://www.examsolutions.net/tutoria...=C2&topic=1308

0

reply

Report

#17

It's part of the specification Edexcel maths GCSE expanding two or more binomials.

0

reply

Report

#18

Tommy59375 NotKidding Both formulae are part of C2 and you'll see them both used in Edexcel textbooks. So you can use either in an Edexcel C2 exam as long as you use them correctly.

The (1+x)^n formula is useful when you have a question where n is left as a variable. You'll see questions like this in the Edexcel textbook but I haven't seen one like this in Edexcel exams for the last 10 years. I have seen questions like this in older papers though (that mock paper question above is pre-2007 I think). RDKGames has shown that you can still use the (a+b)^n formula for a question like this although the working will probably be harder.

I teach both formulae with an emphasis on the (a+b)^n formula since this will be used the most in C2 but I recommend students practice some textbook questions using the (1+x)^n formula. I'd prefer it if there were more exam questions where the (1+x)^n formula was useful so it was clear to students/teachers that both formulae should be taught. At the moment I feel that a large percentage of students completely ignore the second formula, which is a probably why you won't see it being useful in the 2017 exam. Or alternatively the (1+x)^n formula should only be part of C4. This won't be an issue in the new linear exams where C2 and C4 topics are part of the same exam papers.

The (1+x)^n formula is useful when you have a question where n is left as a variable. You'll see questions like this in the Edexcel textbook but I haven't seen one like this in Edexcel exams for the last 10 years. I have seen questions like this in older papers though (that mock paper question above is pre-2007 I think). RDKGames has shown that you can still use the (a+b)^n formula for a question like this although the working will probably be harder.

I teach both formulae with an emphasis on the (a+b)^n formula since this will be used the most in C2 but I recommend students practice some textbook questions using the (1+x)^n formula. I'd prefer it if there were more exam questions where the (1+x)^n formula was useful so it was clear to students/teachers that both formulae should be taught. At the moment I feel that a large percentage of students completely ignore the second formula, which is a probably why you won't see it being useful in the 2017 exam. Or alternatively the (1+x)^n formula should only be part of C4. This won't be an issue in the new linear exams where C2 and C4 topics are part of the same exam papers.

0

reply

Report

#19

(Original post by

Took me less than 4 mins, and I'm not even sure if the examiner would've given you the marks for using the C4 formula as this tests your understand of the factorial notation, but notnek can tell confirm/deny that.

**RDKGames**)Took me less than 4 mins, and I'm not even sure if the examiner would've given you the marks for using the C4 formula as this tests your understand of the factorial notation, but notnek can tell confirm/deny that.

0

reply

Report

#20

(Original post by

For Edexcel exams it would be fine to use the "C4 formula" to tackle this question in C2 and that would be the expected method. If this question was in the 2017 paper then I feel it would cause a lot of problems.

**notnek**)For Edexcel exams it would be fine to use the "C4 formula" to tackle this question in C2 and that would be the expected method. If this question was in the 2017 paper then I feel it would cause a lot of problems.

0

reply

X

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top