Go to first unread
Back
to top
My postal ballot came yesterday and I voted conservative, AMA.
Watch
Announcements
2
reply
Report
#7
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_k...munist_regimes
Communists, statistically, are worse than the Nazis.
Trump rejected the idea of the KKK endorsing him.
Corbyn has not rejected the idea of Communists endorsing him.
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by E_M_M_I_E)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...our-manifesto/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_k...munist_regimes
Communists, statistically, are worse than the Nazis.
Trump rejected the idea of the KKK endorsing him.
Corbyn has not rejected the idea of Communists endorsing him.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...our-manifesto/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_k...munist_regimes
Communists, statistically, are worse than the Nazis.
Trump rejected the idea of the KKK endorsing him.
Corbyn has not rejected the idea of Communists endorsing him.
Proceeds to shake head.
4
reply
Report
#9
"In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:
USSR -- 20 million
China -- 65 million
Vietnam -- 1 million
North Korea -- 2 million
Cambodia -- 2 million
Eastern Europe -- 1 million
Latin America -- 150,000
Africa -- 1.7 million
Afghanistan -- 1.5 million
Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000"
Source is cited in the material. About 94 million died because of communism.
An estimated 6 - 9 million Jews died in the Holocaust. The 20 million claim is unconfirmed.
This means Communism killed about x8 -10 as many people as Nazism.
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by E_M_M_I_E)
Aha, click on Wikipedia and scroll to the sources at the bottom. You'll see there. If you're too lazy, I'll tell you:
"In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:
USSR -- 20 million
China -- 65 million
Vietnam -- 1 million
North Korea -- 2 million
Cambodia -- 2 million
Eastern Europe -- 1 million
Latin America -- 150,000
Africa -- 1.7 million
Afghanistan -- 1.5 million
Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000"
Source is cited in the material. About 94 million died because of communism.
An estimated 6 - 9 million Jews died in the Holocaust. The 20 million claim is unconfirmed.
This means Communism killed about x8 -10 as many people as Nazism.
Aha, click on Wikipedia and scroll to the sources at the bottom. You'll see there. If you're too lazy, I'll tell you:
"In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:
USSR -- 20 million
China -- 65 million
Vietnam -- 1 million
North Korea -- 2 million
Cambodia -- 2 million
Eastern Europe -- 1 million
Latin America -- 150,000
Africa -- 1.7 million
Afghanistan -- 1.5 million
Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000"
Source is cited in the material. About 94 million died because of communism.
An estimated 6 - 9 million Jews died in the Holocaust. The 20 million claim is unconfirmed.
This means Communism killed about x8 -10 as many people as Nazism.
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by Logic4Life)
Yeah I don't bother clicking on or taking information from a useless website that any old joe can edit on...
Yeah I don't bother clicking on or taking information from a useless website that any old joe can edit on...
I stated the latter source, which was not even from Wikipedia, within the content. I searched it up.
Read what I actually said instead of remaining ignorant of the FACTS.
1
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by E_M_M_I_E)
You are clearly remaining ignorant in your beliefs. I'll spell it out for you "Logic4Life", who clearly possesses none of the aforementioned logic.
I stated the latter source, which was not even from Wikipedia, within the content. I searched it up.
Read what I actually said instead of remaining ignorant of the FACTS.
You are clearly remaining ignorant in your beliefs. I'll spell it out for you "Logic4Life", who clearly possesses none of the aforementioned logic.
I stated the latter source, which was not even from Wikipedia, within the content. I searched it up.
Read what I actually said instead of remaining ignorant of the FACTS.
0
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by Logic4Life)
I see wikipedia and I ignore it. What don't you understand??? I don't give a dam about the sources. It's clearly you lacking in the logic department.
I see wikipedia and I ignore it. What don't you understand??? I don't give a dam about the sources. It's clearly you lacking in the logic department.
0
reply
Report
#15
Why did you vote on a stagnant party that is destroying accessible higher education, the environment and NHS?
4
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by E_M_M_I_E)
The subsequent source, not related to Wikipedia or taken from it, is a source in its own right. That means it's likely fact. You clearly "don't give a dam" about the facts, either.
The subsequent source, not related to Wikipedia or taken from it, is a source in its own right. That means it's likely fact. You clearly "don't give a dam" about the facts, either.
0
reply
(Original post by Metalfros)
Why did you vote on a stagnant party that is destroying accessible higher education, the environment and NHS?
Why did you vote on a stagnant party that is destroying accessible higher education, the environment and NHS?
0
reply
(Original post by FallenEyelash)
Did you look up the policies of all the political parties before voting?
Did you look up the policies of all the political parties before voting?
0
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by jim_cramer)
Because I don't like poor people.
Because I don't like poor people.
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
