The Student Room Group

Discussing the Holocaust

There was another frequent attack by the Holocaust deniers.

They think they are clever, just because they read something that questions, the simplified history shown in not very good popular-science TV shows, but they never seem to read more the basic evidence on the subject and dig a bit deeper into it. What are they motivated with- stupidity, hate?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#Use_of_gas_chambers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

I shall add however, that if anyone wishes to fight with Jews, claming that the Holocaust did not happen, such person will also have to fight the memories of another 40 million nation in which almost everyone have or had grandparents, or great grandparents who were either killed by the Nazis, or witnessed the killing.

Denying the Holocaust shows not only the complete ignorance on the subject, and disrespect to Jewish nation, it is also an insult to the Poles who were also aimed for extermination and enslavement, and lost a largest part of their citizens in WWII, among all the countries that took part in it or were affected.

The Nazis killed 3 millions of native Poles, and up to 6 millions of Polish citizens (exept for the Poles, mainly Polish Jews).
Almost every Polish person has or had grandparents or great grandparents who were either killed by the Germans, or seen the Germans killing people, after taking them to forests, or simply at streets. After the Warsaw uprising, the Nazis were even ripping pregnant women open in hospitals, not to mention they deliberately blew up or burned half of the city and killed 220 000 people just in one month.
Moreover several notable persons of Polish public life were arrested as a part of the Intelligenzaktion, and they were killed. In first place to mention, there is also the Generalplan Ost, or the action T4.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_crimes_against_the_Polish_nation

I was personally born and spent most of my life in a town where 60% of population was arrested, locked up in ghetto and "vanished". One of the very first things the Germans did, was to burn a synagogue full of people. There were lots of witnesses as the synagogue was big, next to city center, right next to a medieval castrle standing on a hill.

My great grandparents and grandparents witnessed civilians being killed at streets. One of my great great grandmothers was almost beaten to death by Gestapo. My grandfather who was a kid, almost got killed by an aerial bomb, and later on he worked as a slave in a barbed wire factory. My aunt was chosen for the germanization plan, as she was a little child who looked like a perfect nordic child, and she was only saved by a german who officially adopted her, and left her with our family. Another couple of my great grandparents were arrested by the gestapo and the family was sure they'll never see them again. They only got lucky that the Soviets came in just couple of hours later.

I just hope that the lunatic who has posted the original thread, will read it.
There is no place in any modern society for you, you ignorant scum!
(edited 6 years ago)

Scroll to see replies

Original post by PTMalewski
There was another frequent attack the Holocaust deniers, this time by this account:
https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/member.php?u=3320326

They think they are clever, just because they read something that questions, the simplified history shown in not very good popular-science TV shows, but they never seem to read more the basic evidence on the subject and dig a bit deeper into it. What are they motivated with- stupidity, hate?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#Use_of_gas_chambers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

I shall add however, that if anyone wishes to fight with Jews, claming that the Holocaust did not happen, such person will also have to fight the memories of another 40 million nation in which almost everyone have or had grandparents, or great grandparents who were either killed by the Nazis, or witnessed the killing.

Denying the Holocaust shows not only the complete ignorance on the subject, and disrespect to Jewish nation, it is also an insult to the Poles who were also aimed for extermination and enslavement, and lost a largest part of their citizens in WWII, among all the countries that took part in it or were affected.

The Nazis killed 3 millions of native Poles, and up to 6 millions of Polish citizens (exept for the Poles, mainly Polish Jews).
Almost every Polish person has or had grandparents or great grandparents who were either killed by the Germans, or seen the Germans killing people, after taking them to forests, or simply at streets. After the Warsaw uprising, the Nazis were even ripping pregnant women open in hospitals, not to mention they deliberately blew up or burned half of the city and killed 220 000 people just in one month.
Moreover several notable persons of Polish public life were arrested as a part of the Intelligenzaktion, and they were killed. In first place to mention, there is also the Generalplan Ost, or the action T4.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_crimes_against_the_Polish_nation

I was personally born and spent most of my life in a town where 60% of population was arrested, locked up in ghetto and "vanished". One of the very first things the Germans did, was to burn a synagogue full of people. There were lots of witnesses as the synagogue was big, next to city center, right next to a medieval castrle standing on a hill.

My great grandparents and grandparents witnessed civilians being killed at streets. One of my great great grandmothers was almost beaten to death by Gestapo. My grandfather who was a kid, almost got killed by an aerial bomb, and later on he worked as a slave in a barbed wire factory. My aunt was chosen for the germanization plan, as she was a little child who looked like a perfect nordic child, and she was only saved by a german who officially adopted her, and left her with our family. Another couple of my great grandparents were arrested by the gestapo and the family was sure they'll never see them again. They only got lucky that the Soviets came in just couple of hours later.

I just hope that the lunatic who has posted the original thread, will read it.
There is no place in any modern society for you, you ignorant scum!

TL;DR (not too much)
That guy got banned. End of that, and it must have been a Previously Banned User (PBU - you see this abbreviation a lot on TSR, good to remember)
They joined yesterday (as i write this), and assumably banned the same day.
Question for you: did you mean to say either of the following:
There was another frequent attack by the Holocaust deniers

There was another frequent attack on the Holocaust deniers

or something different?
Reply 2
Original post by ThatsAGoodOne349

or something different?


Are you telling me that you are unable to use context to figure out what should be the word that is missing because of a typo?


Original post by ThatsAGoodOne349
TL;DR (not too much)
That guy got banned. End of that, and it must have been a Previously Banned User (PBU - you see this abbreviation a lot on TSR, good to remember)



Nothing is ended. The new generations, don't have the knowledge of the old ones. So if the propagandists spread their nonsense, we must teach the youth so they don't get easily deceived by those accidental contact with propaganda before it gets detected and banned.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by PTMalewski
Are you telling me that you are unable to use context to figure out what should be the word that is missing because of typo?


OKay, okay, It's monday. I'm not the sharpest tool in the box.

A: do you really have to discuss a removed thread?
besides that,
B: I understand people are just plain rude and don't give a monkeys at all. I get it all the time, but this is just a step too far.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by PTMalewski
There was another frequent attack by the Holocaust deniers, this time by this account:
https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/member.php?u=3320326

They think they are clever, just because they read something that questions, the simplified history shown in not very good popular-science TV shows, but they never seem to read more the basic evidence on the subject and dig a bit deeper into it. What are they motivated with- stupidity, hate?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Holocaust_denial#Use_of_gas_chambers

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust_denial

I shall add however, that if anyone wishes to fight with Jews, claming that the Holocaust did not happen, such person will also have to fight the memories of another 40 million nation in which almost everyone have or had grandparents, or great grandparents who were either killed by the Nazis, or witnessed the killing.

Denying the Holocaust shows not only the complete ignorance on the subject, and disrespect to Jewish nation, it is also an insult to the Poles who were also aimed for extermination and enslavement, and lost a largest part of their citizens in WWII, among all the countries that took part in it or were affected.

The Nazis killed 3 millions of native Poles, and up to 6 millions of Polish citizens (exept for the Poles, mainly Polish Jews).
Almost every Polish person has or had grandparents or great grandparents who were either killed by the Germans, or seen the Germans killing people, after taking them to forests, or simply at streets. After the Warsaw uprising, the Nazis were even ripping pregnant women open in hospitals, not to mention they deliberately blew up or burned half of the city and killed 220 000 people just in one month.
Moreover several notable persons of Polish public life were arrested as a part of the Intelligenzaktion, and they were killed. In first place to mention, there is also the Generalplan Ost, or the action T4.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_crimes_against_the_Polish_nation

I was personally born and spent most of my life in a town where 60% of population was arrested, locked up in ghetto and "vanished". One of the very first things the Germans did, was to burn a synagogue full of people. There were lots of witnesses as the synagogue was big, next to city center, right next to a medieval castrle standing on a hill.

My great grandparents and grandparents witnessed civilians being killed at streets. One of my great great grandmothers was almost beaten to death by Gestapo. My grandfather who was a kid, almost got killed by an aerial bomb, and later on he worked as a slave in a barbed wire factory. My aunt was chosen for the germanization plan, as she was a little child who looked like a perfect nordic child, and she was only saved by a german who officially adopted her, and left her with our family. Another couple of my great grandparents were arrested by the gestapo and the family was sure they'll never see them again. They only got lucky that the Soviets came in just couple of hours later.

I just hope that the lunatic who has posted the original thread, will read it.
There is no place in any modern society for you, you ignorant scum!


As long as people get banned for one side of an argument, you cannot claim to hold up your side of the argument, therefore it has no legitimacy.



Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 5
Original post by Empirical
As long as people get banned for one side of an argument, you cannot claim to hold up your side of the argument, therefore it has no legitimacy.



Posted from TSR Mobile


There is a point of view so faulty that it is forbidden, then I have no legitimacy by trying explain what is wrong with it, while others only censor?

Besides I don't care about legitimacy in this case. I got angry because this case is very close to my heart.
Original post by PTMalewski
There is a point of view so faulty that it is forbidden, then I have no legitimacy by trying explain what is wrong with it, while others only censor?

Besides I don't care about legitimacy in this case. I got angry because this case is very close to my heart.


Something being a sensitive issue should not mean suppressing speech or debate.

People hearing what they don't want to hear can often change the discourse for the better, both individually or collectively. It can also change the discourse for the worse. Better than having a single authorised and approved idea.


Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by Empirical
As long as people get banned for one side of an argument


Original post by Empirical
Something being a sensitive issue should not mean suppressing speech or debate.


Except there is no argument or debate to suppress.

I'm opposed to laws banning Holocaust denial (as I'm opposed to laws banning any crank nonsense), but there is no more of a "debate" around it than there is around those who think the world is flat.
I totally agree- this is not a debate.

Saying that the holocaust didn't exist is like saying that slavery didn't exist. Just really stupid and ignorant and usually only opined to further an agenda.

You can debate about what should be done about holocaust deniers but you cannot debate the holocaust.
Reply 9
Original post by Friffinghell
I totally agree- this is not a debate.

Saying that the holocaust didn't exist is like saying that slavery didn't exist. Just really stupid and ignorant and usually only opined to further an agenda.

You can debate about what should be done about holocaust deniers but you cannot debate the holocaust.


False comparison. The evidence is very different. In the latter case you have a dramatically shifting story with contradictory evidence (eg. look up the claims by the British Prosecutor and French Prosecution regarding what happened at camps like Buchenwald). You need to look at the accounts of medics who inspected camps like Dr John E Gordon, Dr Russell Barton, Dr Charles Larson or Paul Rassinier, who was a Buchenwald inmate, British Intelligence reports, the existence of atrocity propaganda in WWI & WWII, the reality that German witnesses were tortured prior to making confessions, inmate records showing surgeries & hospital care for inmates who couldn't work, corpse descriptions being inconsistent with cyanide or carbon monoxide poisoning (not cherry red) cyanide test samples which fails to support the claims etc.

It's quite obvious when you read this why there is debate.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by Empirical
As long as people get banned for one side of an argument, you cannot claim to hold up your side of the argument, therefore it has no legitimacy.



Posted from TSR Mobile


Apparently not all things historical can be discussed openly. The level of censorship of discussion around this topic is something the Nazis would be proud of (look up Nazi book burning laws & images).
Reply 11
Please do not discuss the removal of threads as this is a moderation issue. If you have an issue with moderation, please go to AtCT. I will allow this thread to remain open, but any further discussion of moderation is not permitted. It is okay to discuss the merits whether or not there should be a discussion on Holocaust denying, since this is the History forum and we should be open to discuss sensitive aspects of history, but only in a respectful matter.

Thank you!

Cesca
Original post by Fullsigma


It's quite obvious when you read this why there is debate.


There isn't a debate, though. There are people who deny it happened, yes, but that no more makes it a debate than the existence of people who believe the earth is flat makes that a debate.
Original post by anarchism101
There isn't a debate, though. There are people who deny it happened, yes, but that no more makes it a debate than the existence of people who believe the earth is flat makes that a debate.


The fact that the earth is flat can be scientifically proven. Historical events involve incomplete evidence, and often contradictory evidence. Hence there are always new books, arguments about history. There have been various revisions over the years, in terms of what happened at different camps, witnesses with differing accounts, debates over what cyanide testing results reveal etc. I can also understand why people would prefer there were no discussion.
Original post by Fullsigma
The fact that the earth is flat can be scientifically proven


Only in eyes of people terribly incompetent in science. And if you think different, you can always hire a physicist or astronomer, to find out how incompetent you are.

Original post by Fullsigma

. Historical events involve incomplete evidence, and often contradictory evidence. Hence there are always new books, arguments about history. There have been various revisions over the years, in terms of what happened at different camps, witnesses with differing accounts, debates over what cyanide testing results reveal etc. I can also understand why people would prefer there were no discussion.


Incomplete evidence on minor parts of an event does not change the overall view as there is far more than enough of evidence that the Nazis were capable of any imaginable, (and not imaginable) crimes.
You may question how exactly and where the Nazis were killing, but not the fact that they did act in the most cruel manner and millions of people died as the result, the evidence on that is overwhelming.
Holocaust deniers are usually fools who make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the real mountains, when they come up with their arguments on evidence.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by PTMalewski
Only in eyes of people terribly incompetent in science. And if you think different, you can always hire a physicist or astronomer, to find out how incompetent you are.



Incomplete evidence on minor parts of an event does not change the overall view as there is far more than enough of evidence that the Nazis were capable of any imaginable, (and not imaginable) crimes.
You may question how exactly and where the Nazis were killing, but not the fact that they did act in the most cruel manner and millions of people died as the result, the evidence on that is overwhelming.
Holocaust deniers are usually fools who make a mountain out of a molehill and ignore the real mountains, when they come up with their arguments on evidence.


Disagree, but I don't think discussion is really permitted here.
Original post by Fullsigma
Disagree, but I don't think discussion is really permitted here.


Permitted or not, you should confront your views with creditable specialists. I do as much as I can, and If had doubts about the basics of anything in science, I would hire a specialists to explain the basics and check if I'm doing some sort of mistake and where.

With the Holocaust, fortunately I do not have to research too much to be sure about it, as my family, neigbors and random people I meet every day, all have or used to have someone in their family who'd seen enough to be allowed to think that the Nazis were capable of anything.
(edited 6 years ago)
Can you sum that up in a sentence?
Original post by ThatsAGoodOne349
TL;DR (not too much)
That guy got banned. End of that, and it must have been a Previously Banned User (PBU - you see this abbreviation a lot on TSR, good to remember)
They joined yesterday (as i write this), and assumably banned the same day.
Question for you: did you mean to say either of the following:


or something different?


Hi there,

I have some concerns which I addressed in an email and its been 13 days and I have yet to receive a reply.

When there are pathetic threads created especially regards to the Holocaust and threads maliciously attacking Islam, why does it take hours or even days for the posts to be taken off and for the account to be banned?
I have witnessed the most vile claims and accusations on this site and I am appalled that it takes this long of a time to penalise these individuals.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by Art of Deception
Hi there,

I have some concerns which I addressed in an email and its been 13 days and I have yet to receive a reply.

When there are pathetic threads created especially regards to the Holocaust and threads maliciously attacking Islam, why does it take hours or even days for the posts to be taken off and for the account to be banned?
I have witnessed the most vile claims and accusations on this site and I am appalled that it takes this long of a time to penalise these individuals.


Hi.
As CAs, We aren't permitted to delete threads unfortunately, so it generally takes someone at a minimum of ST+ to get something concrete done about these sorts of things, the best thing you can actually do is just flag the post (report it), and let the CT get around to your report, although the process is streamlining, and also if a PBU (previously banned user) is found to have made the thread, they get banned and their content fully removed from the site.
As this is not my section (I roll as a CA in Forum Games), I can only refer any issues or concerns you have about content to someone at the bottom of the page (as long as they are aqua or dark purple coloured) and any necessary action can be completed.
Do you have any concrete concerns as of now?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending