# What does it mean by find the real root of f(x)Watch

#1
I was doing an iteration question and in part be they asked me to find the real root of the iteration . Like what's that?
0
2 years ago
#2
(Original post by Rxha)
I was doing an iteration question and in part be they asked me to find the real root of the iteration . Like what's that?

If you never studied complex numbers then you don't have to worry about it.
0
2 years ago
#3
**** explanation but a real number is one that definitely exists, complex (non real) numbers include stuff such as square root -1 which you have to express in more complex ways as they shouldn't exist. A root for f(x) is a value of x where the function is = 0. Basically its just asking you to find a root for the function that does exist.
0
2 years ago
#4
(Original post by Vikingninja)
**** explanation but a real number is one that definitely exists, complex (non real) numbers include stuff such as square root -1 which you have to express in more complex ways as they shouldn't exist. A root for f(x) is a value of x where the function is = 0. Basically its just asking you to find a root for the function that does exist.
Now that is a topic for conversation. In what way does -1.732 or -pi, exist but 3 +2i doesn't?
1
2 years ago
#5
(Original post by Towcestermaths)
Now that is a topic for conversation. In what way does -1.732 or -pi, exist but 3 +2i doesn't?
...in the sense that is different from .
0
2 years ago
#6
(Original post by Zacken)
...in the sense that is different from .
Complex numbers are just as real as 'real' numbers

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
2 years ago
#7
(Original post by Kyx)
Complex numbers are just as real as 'real' numbers

Posted from TSR Mobile
The complex number i is certainly not real as the number 1. They both exist, sure but i is certainly not real at all.
0
2 years ago
#8
(Original post by Towcestermaths)
Now that is a topic for conversation. In what way does -1.732 or -pi, exist but 3 +2i doesn't?
"Real" is not used in a conventional sense and does not really refer to existence. In Layman's terms, real numbers are numbers can be expressed along an infinite, one dimensional, number line. most certainly does, and should, exist, and its value is . If we claim that complex numbers "should not", or "technically do not" exist then many concepts will fall apart.

In all technicality you can write any given real number as , meaning that any real number could be interpreted as a complex number. There is no part of the conventional definition that implies that real numbers and complex numbers are completely mutually exclusive in this sense (most definitions state it to be a number in the form ). Obviously, complex numbers with a non-zero complex part cannot be considered real numbers.
0
2 years ago
#9
(Original post by B_9710)
The complex number i is certainly not real as the number 1. They both exist, sure but i is certainly not real at all.
What _gcx said.

The term 'real' number is an unfortunate name

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
2 years ago
#10
(Original post by Kyx)
Complex numbers are just as real as 'real' numbers

Posted from TSR Mobile
That has nothing to do with what Zacken said.
1
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Bournemouth University
Wed, 31 Jul '19
• Staffordshire University
Wed, 7 Aug '19
• University of Derby
Foundation Open Event Further education
Wed, 7 Aug '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Are you tempted to change your firm university choice on A-level results day?

Yes, I'll try and go to a uni higher up the league tables (146)
17.61%
Yes, there is a uni that I prefer and I'll fit in better (74)
8.93%
No I am happy with my course choice (489)
58.99%
I'm using Clearing when I have my exam results (120)
14.48%