Is Nadal's 10 singles title at French open better than Federer's 7 at WimbledonWatch
Rafeal Nadal won his 10th grand slam singles title at the French open yesterday, he is the only male player of all time to win a singles title at a Grand slam 10 times, do you think it is a greater achievement than Roger Federer's 7 singles titles at Wimbledon a record he shares with Pete Sampras and William Renshaw, Even though they are both records which one is a greater achievement please vote tennis lovers
3 of federers Wimbledon finals were Andy Roddick who isn' the same class as Fed and nadal (except the 3rd final where Roddick was fcking awesome)
Philipous or whatever that Australian guy is
Cilic (worst finalist everrr)
Would he have beat a prime peat Sampras? Imo fed just came at the right time if he were prime around the same time as Sampras and Agassi, he would have got kicked out of Wimbledon every year
, also their head to head in Grand slams is 9-4 in nadals favour because nadal IMO is overall better than him.
Plus the only time Fed won the French was when Nadal was injured so its a bit of a hollow title, he never beat the man.
You just have to compare the stats - Nadal has only lost 2 matches* at the French Open (record of 79-2 win/loss) in 13 tournaments he has participated (*he withdrew from one other due to injury).
Federer's record is 91-11 at Wimbledon in 19 years where he has won 8 Wimbledon titles.