# Edexcel A level Physics Advanced Physics I 15 june 2017 new spec

Watch
Announcements

Hey guys,

What did you think about the paper?

High/low grade boundaries?

Cheers,

PJ

What did you think about the paper?

High/low grade boundaries?

Cheers,

PJ

0

reply

Report

#2

Yeah the paper was ok I hope grade boundaries are low x keep up the good posting pj!

0

reply

Report

#4

It killed me, honestly! I need an A* for the uni I want and I can guaruntee I'm not going to get in now... kms

0

reply

Report

#6

It was alright, I guess. Hope for low grade boundaries...

Some questions were quite tricky

(I'm just going to watch TV now to wash away my tears lol)

Some questions were quite tricky

(I'm just going to watch TV now to wash away my tears lol)

0

reply

Report

#7

It was on okay paper. Yes there were some tricky questions but on a whole it could have been a lot worse. Still praying for low grade boundaries though!

0

reply

Report

#9

do you guys remember what you got for:

- the height h for the projectile question

- whether the boy's uncertainty of the angle (4+ or - 1 degree) was correct (the trolley question)

- capacitor graph

- the height h for the projectile question

- whether the boy's uncertainty of the angle (4+ or - 1 degree) was correct (the trolley question)

- capacitor graph

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

do you guys remember what you got for:

- the height h for the projectile question

- whether the boy's uncertainty of the angle (4+ or - 1 degree) was correct (the trolley question)

- capacitor graph

**EmmaNuel8**)do you guys remember what you got for:

- the height h for the projectile question

- whether the boy's uncertainty of the angle (4+ or - 1 degree) was correct (the trolley question)

- capacitor graph

-no because i got 4.4 degree so difference is about 9%

-charging curve from the bottom of the square and then discharge curve at the end of the square. There are calculations but I don't remember sorry

0

reply

Report

#11

For the height of the projectile question I got something like 2.3m. Couldn't do the degree uncertainty question but got a time period of around 0.05s for the capacitor graph.

0

reply

Report

#12

**EmmaNuel8**)

do you guys remember what you got for:

- the height h for the projectile question

- whether the boy's uncertainty of the angle (4+ or - 1 degree) was correct (the trolley question)

- capacitor graph

Derivation of P=W/T was done using W = FdeltaS and T=2pi/w. Delta S is 2pi x r.

Distance thrown was around 22.5m

Equations 2 and 4 were not possible in the particle decay questions.

Angle Theta was either 4.31 or 8.43.

On the square voltage graph the capacitor dropped to 37% of its original value which is 1.85V. And the time constant worked out to be 5ms.

The small pond pump was the pump which should use the electrostatic motor.

The kg value for Lambda was 1.97x1-27.

0

reply

Report

#14

(Original post by

The height for the shotputter was 2.2m.

Derivation of P=W/T was done using W = FdeltaS and T=2pi/w. Delta S is 2pi x r.

Distance thrown was around 22.5m

Equations 1, 3 and 5 were not possible in the particle decay questions.

Angle Theta was either 4.31 or 8.43.

On the square voltage graph the capacitor dropped to 37% of its original value which is 1.85V. And the time constant worked out to be 5ms.

The small pond pump was the pump which should use the electrostatic motor.

The kg value for Lambda was 1.97x1-27.

**TechnoEngineer**)The height for the shotputter was 2.2m.

Derivation of P=W/T was done using W = FdeltaS and T=2pi/w. Delta S is 2pi x r.

Distance thrown was around 22.5m

Equations 1, 3 and 5 were not possible in the particle decay questions.

Angle Theta was either 4.31 or 8.43.

On the square voltage graph the capacitor dropped to 37% of its original value which is 1.85V. And the time constant worked out to be 5ms.

The small pond pump was the pump which should use the electrostatic motor.

The kg value for Lambda was 1.97x1-27.

0

reply

Report

#15

**TechnoEngineer**)

The height for the shotputter was 2.2m.

Derivation of P=W/T was done using W = FdeltaS and T=2pi/w. Delta S is 2pi x r.

Distance thrown was around 22.5m

Equations 1, 3 and 5 were not possible in the particle decay questions.

Angle Theta was either 4.31 or 8.43.

On the square voltage graph the capacitor dropped to 37% of its original value which is 1.85V. And the time constant worked out to be 5ms.

The small pond pump was the pump which should use the electrostatic motor.

The kg value for Lambda was 1.97x1-27.

0

reply

Report

#16

(Original post by

For the height of the projectile question I got something like 2.3m. Couldn't do the degree uncertainty question but got a time period of around 0.05s for the capacitor graph.

**Rumpelstiltskin_**)For the height of the projectile question I got something like 2.3m. Couldn't do the degree uncertainty question but got a time period of around 0.05s for the capacitor graph.

0

reply

Report

#18

**TechnoEngineer**)

The height for the shotputter was 2.2m.

Derivation of P=W/T was done using W = FdeltaS and T=2pi/w. Delta S is 2pi x r.

Distance thrown was around 22.5m

Equations 1, 3 and 5 were not possible in the particle decay questions.

Angle Theta was either 4.31 or 8.43.

On the square voltage graph the capacitor dropped to 37% of its original value which is 1.85V. And the time constant worked out to be 5ms.

The small pond pump was the pump which should use the electrostatic motor.

The kg value for Lambda was 1.97x1-27.

0

reply

Report

#19

(Original post by

It was on okay paper. Yes there were some tricky questions but on a whole it could have been a lot worse. Still praying for low grade boundaries though!

**helbol_**)It was on okay paper. Yes there were some tricky questions but on a whole it could have been a lot worse. Still praying for low grade boundaries though!

0

reply

Report

#20

(Original post by

-2 point something idk

-no because i got 4.4 degree so difference is about 9%

-charging curve from the bottom of the square and then discharge curve at the end of the square. There are calculations but I don't remember sorry

**vuquach99**)-2 point something idk

-no because i got 4.4 degree so difference is about 9%

-charging curve from the bottom of the square and then discharge curve at the end of the square. There are calculations but I don't remember sorry

0

reply

X

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top