You have d/dx (1/2 sin x cos x) = 1/2 (cos^2 x - sin^2 x), and then have decided that that actually meant 1/2 (cos^2 x + sin^2 x). Sign error. Nothing major.
If I use this, I get: (1/2)cos(2x) so how would I get to sin2x?
generalebriety
You have d/dx (1/2 sin x cos x) = 1/2 (cos^2 x - sin^2 x), and then have decided that that actually meant 1/2 (cos^2 x + sin^2 x). Sign error. Nothing major.
huh? I didn't write 1/2 (cos^2 x + sin^2 x) anywhere! And I don't think any of the signs are wrong.
Its even easier to say: 2y=x-sinxcosx 2y=x-1/2sin2x [sin2x]
Same to you as to nota: this might make it neater, but it makes it no easier to differentiate, and it just makes it less obvious how to proceed once you've differentiated.
Much as I sympathise, hitting everything with random trig identities isn't always the way to go.
Same to you as to nota: this might make it neater, but it makes it no easier to differentiate, and it just makes it less obvious how to proceed once you've differentiated.
Much as I sympathise, hitting everything with random trig identities isn't always the way to go.
But anyways before you differentiate, you should use sin2x=2sinxcosx, and after you differentiate you should use sin2x=21−cos2x (which is just cos2x=1−2sin2x rearranged).
But anyways before you differentiate, you should use sin2x=2sinxcosx, and after you differentiate you should use sin2x=21−cos2x (which is just cos2x=1−2sin2x rearranged).
Yup, like I said. Its not required but it helps doesnt it
2y=x - 1/2sin2x 2dy/dx=1-cos2x dy/dx=1/2(1-cos2x) and from [cos2x] or using a standard result: dy/dx=sin^2(x}
No product rule required...lol
No, but the chain rule's required, which is about as taxing as the product rule, and it means you have to apply the same trig identity twice, once forwards, once backwards. Seems silly to me.
No, but the chain rule's required, which is about as taxing as the product rule, and it means you have to apply the same trig identity twice, once forwards, once backwards. Seems silly to me.
Take another look at his working, and tell me taking the derivative of 21x−41sin2x is half as bad.
No, but the chain rule's required, which is about as taxing as the product rule, and it means you have to apply the same trig identity twice, once forwards, once backwards. Seems silly to me.
Chain rule maybe but its the kind of differentiation that can be done in your head without the chain rule, once your used to it: d (Sin ax)/dx = aCos ax..simply. Surely the identitys are there to use? It seems silly not to use them, even if it has to be applied twice, the final result is what counts.
Is there anything in particular that I should learn from this thread? Anything that I shouldn't be doing in differentiation / trig ? Or is it just that I should be especially aware of signs and brackets.