You are Here: Home >< Maths

# C3 Algebra Division question watch

1. I'm trying to solve this:

But the divisor is awkward and I'm stuck. Please could you show me how to do it using long division?

(I started by dividing 8x^3 by 2x^2 to get the first term of the answer, 4x, then I multiplied this by 2x^2+2 to get the part which you have to takeaway, which is 8x^3+8x. So the 2x^2 in the original equation got skipped out and then I just carried on but I got a negative power so it's all gone a bit bad)
2. (Original post by Sint)
I'm trying to solve this:

But the divisor is awkward and I'm stuck. Please could you show me how to do it using long division?

(I started by dividing 8x^3 by 2x^2 to get the first term of the answer, 4x, then I multiplied this by 2x^2+2 to get the part which you have to takeaway, which is 8x^3+8x. So the 2x^2 in the original equation got skipped out and then I just carried on but I got a negative power so it's all gone a bit bad)
If you aren't already, I recommend using 0 coefficients for missing terms i.e.

Does that help or are you doing this already?
3. (Original post by Sint)
I'm trying to solve this:

But the divisor is awkward and I'm stuck. Please could you show me how to do it using long division?

(I started by dividing 8x^3 by 2x^2 to get the first term of the answer, 4x, then I multiplied this by 2x^2+2 to get the part which you have to takeaway, which is 8x^3+8x. So the 2x^2 in the original equation got skipped out and then I just carried on but I got a negative power so it's all gone a bit bad)
The first wave would leave you with 4x, as you said, and the leftover expression is

Then the second wave leaves you with 1 and the leftover expression of which is the remainder as you cannot go further than this.
4. (Original post by notnek)
.
(Original post by RDKGames)
.
Thanks both of you - I was only using 0 coefficients for the numerator, and using them for the denominator worked So the remainder is [tex]-8x+3[\tex]?

Also one more thing - I tried using the remainder theorem to find the remainder but when I set the divisor equal to 0, I got sqrt -1. Did I do this right? (is it not possible to use the remainder theorem in this case?)
5. (Original post by Sint)
Thanks both of you - I was only using 0 coefficients for the numerator, and using them for the denominator worked So the remainder is [tex]-8x+3[\tex]?

Also one more thing - I tried using the remainder theorem to find the remainder but when I set the divisor equal to 0, I got sqrt -1. Did I do this right? (is it not possible to use the remainder theorem in this case?)
Yes that's the remainder.

Yes you did it right but considering you don't study complex numbers in this module, this approach wouldn't be appropriate.

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: June 19, 2017
Today on TSR

### A level Maths discussions

Find out how you've done here

### 2,798

students online now

Exam discussions

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams