OCR Psychology 22nd June 2017 Applied PsychologyWatch this thread
I'm bricking it
Made more or less the same points as you for the 15 marker - said it was unethical, highly controlled lab experiments meant it lacked ecological validity and unrepresentativeness. For the 10 marker I said lacked objectivity, didn't manipulate variables and the cognitive explanation used inductive reasoning which is scientific (no idea whether any of this is right but anyone does please let me know!) what did you put for the first 10 marker on child "how woods study can help teachers and children problem solve" and on child "how Raines study explains criminal behaviour through physiological factors" sorry for all the questions just honestly believe I failed core studies and this exam
To be honest, I feel the same - the exams comprised either weird, unfair, or mistaken questions. Hopefully the grade boundaries will accurately reflect the candidates' performance!!