AQA Turning Points Physics Help Watch

revisionphysics
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#1
QP
http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...Relativity.pdf


MS
http://pmt.physicsandmathstutor.com/...ivity%20MS.pdf


Q2 a (ii)

why is L0 not equal to 1.5m

for the other equations such as for time and mass how do you know which is t0 and t or m and m0
how do you tell the difference
0
reply
revisionphysics
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#2
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#2
UPDATED the links.
0
reply
Callicious
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#3
Report 1 year ago
#3
Using the formula... er... l0 = l/(root of 1-v^2/c^2)
l0 is the proper distance, i.e. in the protons frame, l in our frame... should be larger in the protons frame?

Proper means in the frame of the thingy doing the distance/two events
The protons are the ones passing the two points at whatever speed, not us
Hence the distance they record is l0, ours is l

I really need to **** right now, sorry for lack of help ;-;
0
reply
revisionphysics
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#4
(Original post by Callicious)
Using the formula... er... l0 = l/(root of 1-v^2/c^2)
l0 is the proper distance, i.e. in the protons frame, l in our frame... should be larger in the protons frame?

Proper means in the frame of the thingy doing the distance/two events
The protons are the ones passing the two points at whatever speed, not us
Hence the distance they record is l0, ours is l

I really need to **** right now, sorry for lack of help ;-;
oh i understand.
thanks.
0
reply
Callicious
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#5
Report 1 year ago
#5
Okay. Had my business, so...

When we derived our formula, l0 was the proper distance.
The meaning of proper in this case is that the distance represented will be that of the frame of reference which was moving at whatever velocity, visiting these two locations.
Our distance watching the protons isn't proper, i.e. we're not in the protons frame, at that velocity, moving between those two locations at that particular time.
Thus, we are L, the protons are L0, and we use that in the equation.

Hope I gave a better explanation!
0
reply
revisionphysics
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#6
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#6
(Original post by Callicious)
Okay. Had my business, so...

When we derived our formula, l0 was the proper distance.
The meaning of proper in this case is that the distance represented will be that of the frame of reference which was moving at whatever velocity, visiting these two locations.
Our distance watching the protons isn't proper, i.e. we're not in the protons frame, at that velocity, moving between those two locations at that particular time.
Thus, we are L, the protons are L0, and we use that in the equation.

Hope I gave a better explanation!
i thinkk i get
gonna do more q's on this
0
reply
Pidge Gunderson
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#7
Report 1 year ago
#7
The way I think of it is just that objects are fastest in their own reference frame, lightest in their own reference same and longest in their own reference frame. A stationary observer perceives the object as slower, heavier and shorter. So I always just rearrange the equation while keeping in mind the bolded statement.

Bit brainless but x)
0
reply
revisionphysics
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#8
Report Thread starter 1 year ago
#8
(Original post by Kyou)
The way I think of it is just that objects are fastest in their own reference frame, lightest in their own reference same and longest in their own reference frame. A stationary observer perceives the object as slower, heavier and shorter. So I always just rearrange the equation while keeping in mind the bolded statement.

Bit brainless but x)
lol who cares about the logic i just need an A probably never gonna come across special relativity again anyways
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • University of Bath
    Undergraduate Virtual Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 23 Feb '19
  • Ravensbourne University London
    School of Design, School of Media Further education
    Sat, 23 Feb '19
  • Leeds Trinity University
    PGCE Open Day Further education
    Sat, 23 Feb '19

Do you have a food intolerance or allergy?

Yes - a food intolerance (44)
12.29%
Yes - a food allergy (39)
10.89%
Yes - an autoimmune disorder (i.e coeliac, colitis) (11)
3.07%
Yes - I have an intolerance and allergy (9)
2.51%
No (255)
71.23%

Watched Threads

View All