Should Creationism be taught in schools?
Watch this thread
TheDuo
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
just as evolution is taught as fact in Science lessons, do you think Creationism should be taught too?
0
reply
Zargabaath
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
username2997138
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
isn't it already taught in schools though? when I was doing my bio GCSE we had to learn why people at the time weren't accepting of the idea of evolution - the main reason being creationism and religious ideas.
it shouldn't be taught fully though - it's not that useful
it shouldn't be taught fully though - it's not that useful
0
reply
nitrogenousBase
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by TheDuo)
just as evolution is taught as fact in Science lessons, do you think Creationism should be taught too?
just as evolution is taught as fact in Science lessons, do you think Creationism should be taught too?
4
reply
TheDuo
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
0
reply
nitrogenousBase
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by TheDuo)
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
1
reply
TheDuo
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
(Original post by nitrogenousBase)
Why is it sensible to teach something that has no empirical evidence as fact?
Why is it sensible to teach something that has no empirical evidence as fact?
0
reply
username1221160
Badges:
19
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
an_atheist
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
username2997138
Badges:
11
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report
#10
(Original post by TheDuo)
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
ur dumb
0
reply
username2763536
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#11
Report
#11
(Original post by TheDuo)
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
0
reply
anosmianAcrimony
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#12
Report
#12
(Original post by TheDuo)
I mean the theory that is was GOD who kick-started evolution, not just a random accident, but once again, teaching it as a THEORY.
I mean the theory that is was GOD who kick-started evolution, not just a random accident, but once again, teaching it as a THEORY.
1
reply
username612415
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#13
Report
#13
(Original post by TheDuo)
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
isn't the most sensible and acceptable solution a combination of both Evolution and Creationism?
0
reply
nitrogenousBase
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#14
Report
#14
(Original post by TheDuo)
I mean the theory that is was GOD who kick-started evolution, not just a random accident, but once again, teaching it as a THEORY.
I mean the theory that is was GOD who kick-started evolution, not just a random accident, but once again, teaching it as a THEORY.
2) It's still barely a theory with no evidence to support it, unlike evolution.
3) Both creationism and deism should be taught as worldviews in religious studies because they are equally unscientific.
0
reply
TheDuo
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#15
the idea of the earth being around for 6000 years is just pure BS.
ok, when I say creationism, I more meant the idea that GOD started whatever form of evolution or whatever you believe in.
ok, when I say creationism, I more meant the idea that GOD started whatever form of evolution or whatever you believe in.
0
reply
username612415
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#16
Report
#16
(Original post by TheDuo)
the idea of the earth being around for 6000 years is just pure BS.
ok, when I say creationism, I more meant the idea that GOD started whatever form of evolution or whatever you believe in.
the idea of the earth being around for 6000 years is just pure BS.
ok, when I say creationism, I more meant the idea that GOD started whatever form of evolution or whatever you believe in.
Regardless of term, there is zero evidence that what you're suggesting happened. So no, it should not be taught in schools.
1
reply
Beth_H
Badges:
16
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#17
Report
#17
Creationism should absolutely be taught in RE, but never in science. To claim that a belief in a God is in any way scientific is frankly damaging to the profession of science, because faith, by its very nature, cannot be supported by empirical evidence.
1
reply
PossiblyNotGod
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#18
TheDuo
Badges:
13
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#19
you can't be disrespecting other's views like that! that is called being intolerant and its what immature humans do.
0
reply
username612415
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#20
Report
#20
(Original post by TheDuo)
you can't be disrespecting other's views like that! that is called being intolerant and its what immature humans do.
you can't be disrespecting other's views like that! that is called being intolerant and its what immature humans do.
2
reply
X
Quick Reply
Back
to top
to top