Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    I've hit a blank

    how to integrate  \int \frac{r}{r-2M} dr ?

    Many thanks.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    Quotient rule
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    hint: r = r - 2M + 2M
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by xfootiecrazeesarax)
    I've hit a blank

    how to integrate  \int \frac{r}{r-2M} dr ?

    Many thanks.
    Disclaimer: I've not touched A-level maths for two years now, but my first thought would be:

     \int \frac{r}{r-2M} dr = \int \left ( r \cdot \frac{1}{r-2M} \right ) dr

    Then use integration by parts
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by xfootiecrazeesarax)
    I've hit a blank

    how to integrate  \int \frac{r}{r-2M} dr ?

    Many thanks.
    \frac{r}{r-2M} = \frac{r-2M + 2M}{r-2M} = 1 + \frac{2M}{r-2M}. The latter is then a standard logarithmic integral.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    \frac{r}{r-2M} = \frac{r-2M + 2M}{r-2M} = 1 + \frac{2M}{r-2M}. The latter is then a standard logarithmic integral.
    that's the man i was looking for, thank you
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Uni12345678)
    Quotient rule
    Quotient rule is for differentiation, not integration
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Zacken)
    \frac{r}{r-2M} = \frac{r-2M + 2M}{r-2M} = 1 + \frac{2M}{r-2M}. The latter is then a standard logarithmic integral.
    This is why I hate integration. Just full of dumb arbitrary tricks like this. The weierstrass sub is probably the worst offender
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by poonslayer9000)
    This is why I hate integration. Just full of dumb arbitrary tricks like this. The weierstrass sub is probably the worst offender
    This doesn't really make sense - it may seem arbitrary but it's a standard obvious technique to me. I'm sure loads of (non-integration) techniques you use are 'arbitrary and dumb' to someone else.

    And the weierstrass sub seems like the worse possible example in complaining about arbitrariness since it's one of the only systematic ways of solving any rational trigonometric integral. Emphasis on systematic.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by K-Man_PhysCheM)
    Quotient rule is for differentiation, not integration
    Oh sugar yes sorry haha
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by xfootiecrazeesarax)
    I've hit a blank

    how to integrate  \int \frac{r}{r-2M} dr ?

    Many thanks.
    The standard approach is the substitution u=r-2M, which makes the fraction nicer, and doesn't introduce any new difficulties with the du since it's a linear transformation.

    I'd say that this is the approach to try first (i.e. look for a sub), as opposed to the cute "add 0" trick already suggested. Substitutions are generally applicable, but tricks are not.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by atsruser)
    The standard approach is the substitution u=r-2M, which makes the fraction nicer, and doesn't introduce any new difficulties with the du since it's a linear transformation.

    I'd say that this is the approach to try first (i.e. look for a sub), as opposed to the cute "add 0" trick already suggested. Substitutions are generally applicable, but tricks are not.
    The "add 0" trick is an algebraic simplification. Algebraic simplification to make an integral easier is certainly generally applicable.

    It's hard to say there's a definitive order of "you should try approach X before Y" with integrals, because there are always cases where it's fairly obvious you should do the opposite. That said, two heuristics I personally give high priority are:

    Is there a way to simplify this algebraically?
    Is there a way to simplify this using trig identities?

    I see many integrals posted on TSR where the poster would have benefited by exploring these options before jumping into integration specific methods.

    [That said, linear substitution is generally at least "benign" - it's unlikely to make things worse, even if it doesn't help].
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: July 17, 2017
Poll
Do you agree with the proposed ban on plastic straws and cotton buds?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.