Can't understand the question (business law) Watch

YosemiteSam
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
Even though I'm a Bussiness Student, I really need help with this one.
I have failed one of the assessments for Business Environments at my first year at uni, so I've been told to do an essay as the reassesment in order to progress in uni further. The problem is that I'm not really good at Business Law, although we've been taught of it too, and English is not my first language. The essay title is:

Critically examine the provisions of Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 relating to product liability. To what extent do these provisions constitute an improvement upon the common law rules?

Could anyone please explain to me what does the second sentence of the essay title means? I really don't get it.
0
reply
TheLawLlama
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
(Original post by YosemiteSam)
Even though I'm a Bussiness Student, I really need help with this one.
I have failed one of the assessments for Business Environments at my first year at uni, so I've been told to do an essay as the reassesment in order to progress in uni further. The problem is that I'm not really good at Business Law, although we've been taught of it too, and English is not my first language. The essay title is:

Critically examine the provisions of Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 relating to product liability. To what extent do these provisions constitute an improvement upon the common law rules?

Could anyone please explain to me what does the second sentence of the essay title means? I really don't get it.
This question is asking you to compare the rules contained within statute (i.e. part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987) with the rules that had been created previously in cases (i.e. common law rules). Product liability is concerned with making the manufacturers of products liable when a defect in that prodcut has caused injury or harm to another person.

Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced the notion of strict liability for defective products into UK law. This means that if there was a defect in a particular product then the manufacturer of the product would be automatically liable for any harm caused by that defect whether he or she was at fault or not. So, the question is asking you how the statute here has improved the case law covering the same domain (i.e. how statute has improved the law relating to product liability, as found in case law).

I hope this helps!

Llama
0
reply
YosemiteSam
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#3
(Original post by TheLawLlama)
This question is asking you to compare the rules contained within statute (i.e. part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987) with the rules that had been created previously in cases (i.e. common law rules). Product liability is concerned with making the manufacturers of products liable when a defect in that prodcut has caused injury or harm to another person.

Part 1 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987 introduced the notion of strict liability for defective products into UK law. This means that if there was a defect in a particular product then the manufacturer of the product would be automatically liable for any harm caused by that defect whether he or she was at fault or not. So, the question is asking you how the statute here has improved the case law covering the same domain (i.e. how statute has improved the law relating to product liability, as found in case law).

I hope this helps!

Llama
Thank you for your response!

Now I believe that I might have confused these "common law rules" with the term "(English) Common Law".
Other than that how do I learn which acts and laws related to product liability where implemented and used before CPA 1987? In the copy of the official document I found list of amendments (Limitation of actions under Part I) - is that what I should focus on?
0
reply
TheLawLlama
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#4
Report 2 years ago
#4
(Original post by YosemiteSam)
Thank you for your response!

Now I believe that I might have confused these "common law rules" with the term "(English) Common Law".
Other than that how do I learn which acts and laws related to product liability where implemented and used before CPA 1987? In the copy of the official document I found list of amendments (Limitation of actions under Part I) - is that what I should focus on?
No, the 'common law rules' is the English Common Law. Both phrases essentially mean judge made law i.e. case law. You aren't looking for acts/stature prior to the CPA 1987, you are looking for CASES relating to product liability that existed before the CPA 1987 and comparing those cases to what is contained within the CPA 1987 itself

Llama
1
reply
Good bloke
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#5
Report 2 years ago
#5
(Original post by YosemiteSam)
Now I believe that I might have confused these "common law rules" with the term "(English) Common Law".
No, they amount to the same thing. It is difficult to pin down common law precisely because it cannot be found in any one place.
1
reply
YosemiteSam
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#6
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#6
(Original post by TheLawLlama)
No, the 'common law rules' is the English Common Law. Both phrases essentially mean judge made law i.e. case law. You aren't looking for acts/stature prior to the CPA 1987, you are looking for CASES relating to product liability that existed before the CPA 1987 and comparing those cases to what is contained within the CPA 1987 itself

Llama
Oh, now I got it. Thanks a lot!
1
reply
TheLawLlama
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#7
Report 2 years ago
#7
(Original post by YosemiteSam)
Oh, now I got it. Thanks a lot!
No worries, glad I could help!

Llama
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • Norwich University of the Arts
    Postgraduate Open Day Postgraduate
    Thu, 23 Jan '20
  • SOAS University of London
    Development Studies, Interdisciplinary Studies, Anthropology and Sociology, Languages, Cultures and Linguistics, Arts, Economics, Law, History, Religions and Philosophies, Politics and International Studies, Finance and Management, East Asian Languages & Cultures Postgraduate
    Sat, 25 Jan '20
  • University of Huddersfield
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 25 Jan '20

How many universities have you heard back from?

0 (76)
15.11%
1 (69)
13.72%
2 (65)
12.92%
20.48%
20.28%
5 (88)
17.5%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed