Turn on thread page Beta

Would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5? watch

    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by applesforme)
    There is zero scientific proof of height being directly proportional to **** size. The two things are not related. In actual fact the taller the guy the more his **** will look twiddly.
    Who said my statement was scientific hahaha
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    I'd rather be 6'5" than 5'8"; but I wouldn't trade the former for my current 5'10".
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    I'm 5'7. I'd hate to be 6'5, that's too tall so 5'8 for sure. Tbh I'd rather be 5'8 than 6'0 as well. 6'0+ is lanky to me.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by applesforme)
    There is zero scientific proof of height being directly proportional to **** size. The two things are not related. In actual fact the taller the guy the more his **** will look twiddly.
    I beg to differ

    Christopher here has height and **** size that is well above average. So , in his special case, there is a correlation!

    Btw who is that on your avatar
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by august11)
    I'm 5'7. I'd hate to be 6'5, that's too tall so 5'8 for sure. Tbh I'd rather be 5'8 than 6'0 as well. 6'0+ is lanky to me.
    Be 220lbs lean at 6'0 and you won't be lanky. Being above 6'0 and buff you will look like a god to girls. Takes much more work to build up your body when you're taller but the end results look so much better than if you're short.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BefuddledPenguin)
    5ft 8 that way I can be attractive just by being the cute little guy taller girls love to hug..
    Lol how's that working out for you?

    (Original post by BefuddledPenguin)
    Being tall means you have to get buff to avoid looking super lanky and awkward
    .
    Agreed but if you do manage to get buff and you're tall (6'1+), it's an instant mouth opener for females
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by brin27)
    Be 220lbs lean at 6'0 and you won't be lanky. Being above 6'0 and buff you will look like a god to girls. Takes much more work to build up your body when you're taller but the end results look so much better than if you're short.
    That is true (Sam off BB pulls it off for example) but I'm not that type of person, you know? I'm a beanpole with a non-lad personality. So I'm happy with average height lol. Not dissing 6+ people.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I don't care. I'm 5'8 right now, and probably younger than most ppl here (GCSE sorta age... not A level or uni :P)
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by butfirst_coffee)
    I beg to differ

    Christopher here has height and **** size that is well above average. So , in his special case, there is a correlation!

    Btw who is that on your avatar
    lol ok I guess your future wife will be a lucky woman. And that's Salma Hayek in the film From Dusk till Dawn
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Very Important Poster
    I'm shorter than both so I'd take either.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    6'6 100%
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    6'5"

    Spoiler:
    Show

    I'm 6'4"
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    i'd love to be 6'5
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    my goal is 6'4 pray4me pls
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    6’5 hands down... make a poll pls
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    Neither. I'm content with being 5'11. All my clothes fit me right. Being 5'8 would make me unattractive to a lot of girls. Being 6'5 would make it very difficult and expensive to find clothes/shoes. I like being inconspicuous and not attracting much attention to myself, and as a result I've always been good at sneaking up on people.

    I think I'd want to be 6'2 or 6'3 at the tallest. Otherwise my proportions would change too much, and I wouldn't look like me anymore. Don't wanna be shorter- it just... sucks.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    6'5" definitely,the baddest of B's are around the 5'10 mark so 6'5" is perfect for them
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Michal68)
    Get buff at 6'5 and you'll look like a god. 5'8 is manlet size.

    But yes being scrawny at 6'5 wouldn't look great.
    5 ft 8 isnt manlet size u dumb ****
 
 
 

2,987

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources
AtCTs

Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

Welcome Lounge

Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.