Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

Would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5? Watch

    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by applesforme)
    There is zero scientific proof of height being directly proportional to **** size. The two things are not related. In actual fact the taller the guy the more his **** will look twiddly.
    Who said my statement was scientific hahaha
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    I'd rather be 6'5" than 5'8"; but I wouldn't trade the former for my current 5'10".
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    I'm 5'7. I'd hate to be 6'5, that's too tall so 5'8 for sure. Tbh I'd rather be 5'8 than 6'0 as well. 6'0+ is lanky to me.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by applesforme)
    There is zero scientific proof of height being directly proportional to **** size. The two things are not related. In actual fact the taller the guy the more his **** will look twiddly.
    I beg to differ

    Christopher here has height and **** size that is well above average. So , in his special case, there is a correlation!

    Btw who is that on your avatar
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by august11)
    I'm 5'7. I'd hate to be 6'5, that's too tall so 5'8 for sure. Tbh I'd rather be 5'8 than 6'0 as well. 6'0+ is lanky to me.
    Be 220lbs lean at 6'0 and you won't be lanky. Being above 6'0 and buff you will look like a god to girls. Takes much more work to build up your body when you're taller but the end results look so much better than if you're short.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BefuddledPenguin)
    5ft 8 that way I can be attractive just by being the cute little guy taller girls love to hug..
    Lol how's that working out for you?

    (Original post by BefuddledPenguin)
    Being tall means you have to get buff to avoid looking super lanky and awkward
    .
    Agreed but if you do manage to get buff and you're tall (6'1+), it's an instant mouth opener for females
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by brin27)
    Be 220lbs lean at 6'0 and you won't be lanky. Being above 6'0 and buff you will look like a god to girls. Takes much more work to build up your body when you're taller but the end results look so much better than if you're short.
    That is true (Sam off BB pulls it off for example) but I'm not that type of person, you know? I'm a beanpole with a non-lad personality. So I'm happy with average height lol. Not dissing 6+ people.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    I don't care. I'm 5'8 right now, and probably younger than most ppl here (GCSE sorta age... not A level or uni :P)
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by butfirst_coffee)
    I beg to differ

    Christopher here has height and **** size that is well above average. So , in his special case, there is a correlation!

    Btw who is that on your avatar
    lol ok I guess your future wife will be a lucky woman. And that's Salma Hayek in the film From Dusk till Dawn
    • Very Important Poster
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    I'm shorter than both so I'd take either.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    6'6 100%
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    6'5"

    Spoiler:
    Show

    I'm 6'4"
    • Political Ambassador
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    i'd love to be 6'5
    Online

    16
    ReputationRep:
    my goal is 6'4 pray4me pls
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    6’5 hands down... make a poll pls
    Offline

    7
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zigglr)
    As a guy would you rather be 5'8 or 6'5?
    Neither. I'm content with being 5'11. All my clothes fit me right. Being 5'8 would make me unattractive to a lot of girls. Being 6'5 would make it very difficult and expensive to find clothes/shoes. I like being inconspicuous and not attracting much attention to myself, and as a result I've always been good at sneaking up on people.

    I think I'd want to be 6'2 or 6'3 at the tallest. Otherwise my proportions would change too much, and I wouldn't look like me anymore. Don't wanna be shorter- it just... sucks.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    6'5" definitely,the baddest of B's are around the 5'10 mark so 6'5" is perfect for them
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Michal68)
    Get buff at 6'5 and you'll look like a god. 5'8 is manlet size.

    But yes being scrawny at 6'5 wouldn't look great.
    5 ft 8 isnt manlet size u dumb ****
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources
    AtCTs

    Ask the Community Team

    Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

    Welcome Lounge

    Welcome Lounge

    We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.