I am asking in terms of logical consistency, not in terms of severity of moral turpitude.
These two are related in that the victim understands the outcome, but refuses to take precautions based on the moral standards to which they hold the public.
How different is the consequence of being sexually assaulted due to revealing clothing and lascivious behavior, from the consequence of having an expensive, uninsured car stolen in a bad neighborhood?
Summary Question: What makes one ask for it?
I am foremost noting that I do not support rape, nor vehicular theft. Any attempts to accuse me of rape or grand theft auto apologetics can save themselves the time - admit yourself for psychiatric evaluation if you believe either to be the case.