Poll: Which course should I apply for?
E&M - Oxford (12)
34.29%
Economics - Cambridge (23)
65.71%
pinksplodge
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
Any advice or answers are appreciated greatly Thanks!
1
reply
CambEcon2015
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
I'm a current cambridge econ undergrad - so obviously you should expect quite a biased opinion here

For 1 and 2 I think it is generally accepted that both Oxford and Cambridge will take a holistic view of applications, I don't think either necessarily values interviews more than the other. To be accepted you need to be an all round strong applicant with a good PS and a relatively good interview. However, it is important to remember that (at Cambridge at least) there are no set weightings on each section of the application, so there is no point trying to game it on this.

For 3 don't let that put you off - remember it is only 1 of 5 choices so there is no real harm in putting it down, if you don't apply you definitely will not get in so you may as well give it a go.

For 4 the course at Cambridge is as mathematical as LSE/UCL so you do need to like maths, it's slightly different to A-level maths in that it is obviously applied to economic theory. What you need to be good at is quickly picking up concepts, you don't have time to fall behind.

Now for the bias- I know several people who go to Oxford who all claim E&M is a bit of a joke, there isn't a huge workload and none of it is that difficult (apparently).It's seen as a course for people who want to go and work in the City afterwards. Obviously I don't do it so can't give an accurate description - this is all just hearsay. The Cambridge course is definitely rigorous and gives a thorough grounding in Micro and Macro.

Look at the courses in more detail to see which you would rather do. You need to think about whether you want to take a course that is only half economics (I didn't apply to Oxford because I didn't want to do management). It is also important to consider whether you want to go to Oxbridge - obviously there are a lot of good things about it traditions/strong courses etc. but there are also a lot of negatives so please weigh those up and decide whether it is worth it before you apply.

Any questions about Cam feel free to message me or just reply on this thread
0
reply
That'sGreat
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#3
Report 2 years ago
#3
Sad to say but interviews play a major role in most universities, let alone Oxford and Cambridge. On top of that, they're very important for jobs as well. Just practice interviews as they aren't that hard and apply for Oxford
0
reply
CambEcon2015
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#4
Report 2 years ago
#4
(Original post by That'sGreat)
Sad to say but interviews play a major role in most universities, let alone Oxford and Cambridge. On top of that, they're very important for jobs as well. Just practice interviews as they aren't that hard and apply for Oxford
You realise very few universities interview for economics - only Oxbridge

An average interview can be overcome by an excellent on paper performance and likewise a good interview cannot overcome a less good on paper performance. As I said it is holistic.

My Dos has been very clear that the whole application does not rest on a 25 minute interview so do not stress too much about it
0
reply
That'sGreat
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#5
Report 2 years ago
#5
(Original post by CambEcon2015)
You realise very few universities interview for economics - only Oxbridge

An average interview can be overcome by an excellent on paper performance and likewise a good interview cannot overcome a less good on paper performance. As I said it is holistic.

My Dos has been very clear that the whole application does not rest on a 25 minute interview so do not stress too much about it
I was referring more to him admitting he wasn't great at interviews, and I was pointing it that he needs to work on them as many jobs put heavy focus on them. Sure academics are important, but if you can't present yourself - I don't see him having a great chance at a big bank or consultancy firm
0
reply
CambEcon2015
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#6
Report 2 years ago
#6
(Original post by That'sGreat)
I was referring more to him admitting he wasn't great at interviews, and I was pointing it that he needs to work on them as many jobs put heavy focus on them. Sure academics are important, but if you can't present yourself - I don't see him having a great chance at a big bank or consultancy firm
Presumably he's 17 so he'll have plenty of time to work on that before applying for internships/jobs
You've got a v different outlook on things at 17 than you do at 21+ so I think it's important not to be too concerned about it at this moment in time
0
reply
yudothis
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 2 years ago
#7
Since when does Cambridge to Economics at undergraduate level? I thought they just offered Land Economics.
0
reply
CambEcon2015
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#8
Report 2 years ago
#8
(Original post by yudothis)
Since when does Cambridge to Economics at undergraduate level? I thought they just offered Land Economics.
http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/about/history/

literally since 1903
0
reply
VaidyaA
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#9
Report 2 years ago
#9
I am an international student from India, currently in grade 12 and have Physics, Maths, Chemistry, Economics and English. I have the requisite marks so far in my grade 9 (94%) 10 (96%) and 11 ( 93%) and am expecting very good predicted scores. I am also a little split between Eco/Management at Oxford and Econ at Cambridge. I am pretty good at maths as far as understanding the concepts and their application is concerned but feeling a little unsure may be due to more pre admission hurdles in Cambridge. Would you have anything to say that would be relevant for an international student. International students generally get conditional offers and have to crack STEPII and STEP III which are very tough exams i have been given to understand. Would be happy to hear from you.....Thanks
0
reply
pinksplodge
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#10
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#10
(Original post by CambEcon2015)
I'm a current cambridge econ undergrad - so obviously you should expect quite a biased opinion here

For 1 and 2 I think it is generally accepted that both Oxford and Cambridge will take a holistic view of applications, I don't think either necessarily values interviews more than the other. To be accepted you need to be an all round strong applicant with a good PS and a relatively good interview. However, it is important to remember that (at Cambridge at least) there are no set weightings on each section of the application, so there is no point trying to game it on this.

For 3 don't let that put you off - remember it is only 1 of 5 choices so there is no real harm in putting it down, if you don't apply you definitely will not get in so you may as well give it a go.

For 4 the course at Cambridge is as mathematical as LSE/UCL so you do need to like maths, it's slightly different to A-level maths in that it is obviously applied to economic theory. What you need to be good at is quickly picking up concepts, you don't have time to fall behind.

Now for the bias- I know several people who go to Oxford who all claim E&M is a bit of a joke, there isn't a huge workload and none of it is that difficult (apparently).It's seen as a course for people who want to go and work in the City afterwards. Obviously I don't do it so can't give an accurate description - this is all just hearsay. The Cambridge course is definitely rigorous and gives a thorough grounding in Micro and Macro.

Look at the courses in more detail to see which you would rather do. You need to think about whether you want to take a course that is only half economics (I didn't apply to Oxford because I didn't want to do management). It is also important to consider whether you want to go to Oxbridge - obviously there are a lot of good things about it traditions/strong courses etc. but there are also a lot of negatives so please weigh those up and decide whether it is worth it before you apply.

Any questions about Cam feel free to message me or just reply on this thread
Thank you so much for such a detailed reply - sorry for the late response! After considering everything I have decided to go with my gut feeling and the course that I'm most interested in, which is Economics at Cambridge (similarly to yourself, I don't particularly want to do management at this stage). I do have a few questions:
1) In the personal statement, how would you advise reflecting on a book that I have read without coming across as pretentious or insulting to the author? Also, is it worth mentioning that I agree with the author?
2) How did you choose which college to apply to?
3) The ECAA has only been introduced recently, as I understand it. Were there any admissions tests for economics before this that I can use to prepare for the ECAA?
Thanks again for your time it is much appreciated
0
reply
CambEcon2015
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#11
Report 2 years ago
#11
(Original post by pinksplodge)
Thank you so much for such a detailed reply - sorry for the late response! After considering everything I have decided to go with my gut feeling and the course that I'm most interested in, which is Economics at Cambridge (similarly to yourself, I don't particularly want to do management at this stage). I do have a few questions:
1) In the personal statement, how would you advise reflecting on a book that I have read without coming across as pretentious or insulting to the author? Also, is it worth mentioning that I agree with the author?
2) How did you choose which college to apply to?
3) The ECAA has only been introduced recently, as I understand it. Were there any admissions tests for economics before this that I can use to prepare for the ECAA?
Thanks again for your time it is much appreciated
Ah excellent choice!

I think it's good to talk about what's been said in the book and potentially how this has changed your opinions or how this has made you more interested in this topic of economics etc. I would say remember that you have a very limited character allowance so you obviously can't go into huge amounts of depth and admissions tutors are aware of this so don't worry.

With colleges it doesn't really matter it's all cambridge. However, for picking purposes location and size are important factors. Economics is based at sidgwick site but then all the shops are in the centre so somewhere in the middle is good. Also consider whether you want to be in a big college with 150-200 people per year (e.g. trinity/johns/queens) or somewhere small with less than 100 per year (corpus/peterhouse) or somewhere in between. Then there's also the fact that some colleges have accommodation on site for all 3 years (Queens' definitely do and I think a few others do too) or whether you want to live in a college owned house away from site for at least one year. The alternative prospectus should give you a pretty good idea of that. And then aesthetics: do you want to be near the river or do you want to be able to walk on grass etc. Take a look at colleges here: https://www.applytocambridge.com/

I didn't have any admissions tests when I applied so I can't offer much help there, but I do think there's a sample paper somewhere online?

Hope this has helped!
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • University of East Anglia
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sun, 20 Oct '19
  • University for the Creative Arts
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sun, 20 Oct '19
  • University of Gloucestershire
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sun, 20 Oct '19

Have you made up your mind on your five uni choices?

Yes I know where I'm applying (96)
68.57%
No I haven't decided yet (27)
19.29%
Yes but I might change my mind (17)
12.14%

Watched Threads

View All