The Student Room Group

Racial bias in the IB industry

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Terry Tibbs
Funny how SEO is supposed to be for the disadvantaged, yet the majority of people who get success from it happen to be middle class enthic minorities, not ethnic minorities with actual disadvantages.

Posted from TSR Mobile


the catchment net is quite huge. to be fair, as previously said, it's another resource at peoples disposal which is useful to take up.
Original post by Terry Tibbs
Funny how SEO is supposed to be for the disadvantaged, yet the majority of people who get success from it happen to be middle class enthic minorities, not ethnic minorities with actual disadvantages.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Actually these are the requirements:

1) Attended a non-fee paying school or fee paying school on a means-tested bursary
AND
2) At least one of the following indicators:
(i) The first generation of your immediate family to attend university
(ii) Have been eligible for free school meals or some form of income-related
financial assistance
(iii) Have been in care, a care giver or a care leaver

I don't see how that's middle class. Also these programmes aren't only for ethnic minorities they are for all people of low socioeconomic status.
Original post by ♥Samantha♥
Actually these are the requirements:

1) Attended a non-fee paying school or fee paying school on a means-tested bursary
AND
2) At least one of the following indicators:
(i) The first generation of your immediate family to attend university
(ii) Have been eligible for free school meals or some form of income-related
financial assistance
(iii) Have been in care, a care giver or a care leaver

I don't see how that's middle class. Also these programmes aren't only for ethnic minorities they are for all people of low socioeconomic status.


That's correct but you'd be surprised at how many already middle class ethnic minorities are part of SEO

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by sachinisgod
It is a known fact that in the UK careers like Medicine and the sciences are dominated by Asians.. and the Corporate FInance and Banking is dominated by whites. Its been a pattern for years now and in my mind it wont change. Atleast non whites should be thankful that there are many career sectors in the UK where there are plenty of them and they have a good chance for them to make a career, in a majority white country. So we need to get over this mindset.

( speaking as a 1st generation British Indian)

Edit- I voted UKIP too for your kind information


you're Indian and you voted UKIP lol you deluded
Original post by Princepieman
That's correct but you'd be surprised at how many already middle class ethnic minorities are part of SEO

Posted from TSR Mobile


I'm don't meet that criteria and I'm just typical middle class. It must be quite a generous definition of middle class then if those people are considered it.
Original post by ♥Samantha♥
Actually these are the requirements:

1) Attended a non-fee paying school or fee paying school on a means-tested bursary
AND
2) At least one of the following indicators:
(i) The first generation of your immediate family to attend university
(ii) Have been eligible for free school meals or some form of income-related
financial assistance
(iii) Have been in care, a care giver or a care leaver

I don't see how that's middle class. Also these programmes aren't only for ethnic minorities they are for all people of low socioeconomic status.


The criteria isn't that rigid, provided you are not white, you can get in. For example, 90% of those that got spring weeks from my uni used SEO, most of which were fairly middle class. I hardly doubt it was the "CV and cover letter" assistance that got them in, in other words, it's merely a proxy for a diversity quota.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ♥Samantha♥
Actually these are the requirements:

1) Attended a non-fee paying school or fee paying school on a means-tested bursary
AND
2) At least one of the following indicators:
(i) The first generation of your immediate family to attend university
(ii) Have been eligible for free school meals or some form of income-related
financial assistance
(iii) Have been in care, a care giver or a care leaver

I don't see how that's middle class. Also these programmes aren't only for ethnic minorities they are for all people of low socioeconomic status.


You missed the most important thing, that all "black or minority ethnic origin" can apply. This is one of the problems of SEO, that their are a lot of people who are "middle class" went to grammer schools in bucks or essex etc. A reason for this is that, (a sad fact as well) on the whole they have more confidence in interviews, can express themselves in a clearer way (avoiding slang). Furthermore these candidates generally have grown up in a environment where they can fully concentrate on their studies. These are some of the major obstacles which face applicants who are from less affluent backgrounds.

Of course their are exceptions, I know a few people from seo, who have made it through the hard way and I have the up most respect for them but generally seo should be doing more to train people to communicate in a improved manner, giving support sessions on how to act in certain social situations etc. Rather than picking up these applicants who are more or less "middle class" and who wouldn't benefit as much as applicants who come from inner-city London, Birmingham etc.
Reply 67
Original post by Dot.Cotton
What's wrong with 90% of interns being white? The UK is ~90% white, surely that's a sign that the hiring staff aren't being discriminatory in the slightest?


The whole of the UK population is irrelevant. Only people who are interested in investment banking are to be considered.
Original post by Desmos
The whole of the UK population is irrelevant. Only people who are interested in investment banking are to be considered.


Maybe, just maybe, there are fewer non-whites than whites interested in banking such that you end up with the 90% being white? Just throwing that out there.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Also let's not forget that applicants who are even "middle class", with top cv's etc are still looked over when compared to applicants from independent schools with worse grades and achievements. This is where Seo does help, in getting these candidates through to final rounds. Personally I think that my best shot is through one of these disadvantaged schemes through Seo, even though I maybe don't really fit the type of candidate their looking for. Which is unfortunately the sad truth for many candidates of ethnic minority.

Which goes back to one of the main problems, once hr or whoever sees a name which is an ethnic minority, they generally have stereotypes in the back of their head, which are often of negative connotations, that even if I invite them to interview they won't perform as well as this other candidate who is "white" etc. This can and will not improve unless their ethnic diversity in their hr recruitment teams, as when looking for candidates they will tend to look for themselves in a person, someone they can relate to (this happens in all walks of life) and if in their back of their mind they can paint a picture of this candidate and relate him to x,y,z who came from this school, this uni and who are top performers within the bank, then they will go for the candidate who most resembles that person.
Original post by thatapanydude
You missed the most important thing, that all "black or minority ethnic origin" can apply. This is one of the problems of SEO, that their are a lot of people who are "middle class" went to grammer schools in bucks or essex etc. A reason for this is that, (a sad fact as well) on the whole they have more confidence in interviews, can express themselves in a clearer way (avoiding slang). Furthermore these candidates generally have grown up in a environment where they can fully concentrate on their studies. These are some of the major obstacles which face applicants who are from less affluent backgrounds.

Of course their are exceptions, I know a few people from seo, who have made it through the hard way and I have the up most respect for them but generally seo should be doing more to train people to communicate in a improved manner, giving support sessions on how to act in certain social situations etc. Rather than picking up these applicants who are more or less "middle class" and who wouldn't benefit as much as applicants who come from inner-city London, Birmingham etc.


I don't know much about it bc I hadn't heard of SEO before today. This is all only anecdotal but if it's correct then yes I agree that they should be focusing on those who are most deprived. Though I'm sure those who are disadvantaged get accepted, but applicant numbers from the middle classes just outstrip those in genuine deprivation. Also there are the issues that the poorer you are the less likely that you will have the required grades or be at the 'right' universities. like when it's said most people seem to be middle class who take part in the programme, how many minority kids from deprived backgrounds are at your unis in the first place? there's even man minority kids in the first place irrespective of background. It's really sad and I think that definitely more has to be done to improve the academic prospects of the poorer inner city kids.

But like others said I don't see how using things like SEO/Rare is any different to other networks which people use. There is no "fast track" or back doors they just make the candidate better, bc they have all the specialist knowledge on what it takes to get an offer. those who say its a quota are just conspiracy theorists, when it says clearly on the websites what they are. everyone has to go through the exact same application processes. it's just like people with family connections or 'old boy' networks, or people who attend universities better equipped for it than others (many universities have great careers help who can provide similar services). or even people who pay for preparation.
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by gr8wizard10
in 2017, we don't all have equal connections or links to the industry.

most definiately.

for example if it wasn't for SEO, I wouldn't even know how to structure my CV properly for the banking industry. it was through SEO I was introduced to an SEO alumni who i went to set up a meet and sit down with, to help learn about the actual culture of the industry which i was able to translate on my CLs to display signs of research into the field.

if a person can find their own methods to learn to setup a strong app, which is in fact becoming easier, due to tools such as LinkedIn/WSO/M&I which i utilised quite extensively in my undergrad years, then by all means ofcourse he can get in (provided he passes the interviews).

SEO doesn't give you internships/grad offers, it simply offers the tools to balance the playing field with those who have industry connections. i spend alot of my time nowadays, supporting students on the SEO platform with regards to offering advice on CVs and Cover Letters which is the biggest hurdle (imo) for disadvantaged kids. with connections its pretty easy to know what a CV or CL for banking should look like, without it becomes pretty difficult. and there's no point discussing racial imbalances when most fail at the first hurdle by submitting a 2 page CV.

no-one 'needs' these organisations, but if you're a smart kid who's eligible to apply (which most people at top unis are).. it would be pretty dumb not to take advantage of the resources at your disposal.

note: i would consider these organisations to be like a family for the disadvantaged. the same way europeans stick together with regards to offering advice on applications/interviews, SEO can help introduce members to SEO alumni who also offer advice. so it's a family/friends type ordeal under a charity name.


Noob Q but what is an SEO
Original post by Blancosdos
Noob Q but what is an SEO


Sponsors for Educational Opportunity
Original post by Desmos
The whole of the UK population is irrelevant. Only people who are interested in investment banking are to be considered.


do you have any reason to believe that the ethnicity breakdown of the people interested in IB is any different to the ethnicity breakdown of the whole population or are you just saying it for no reason
Original post by ♥Samantha♥
. It's really sad and I think that definitely more has to be done to improve the academic prospects of the poorer inner city kids.

I think this is they key. I'm all in favour if seo helping "middle class" ethnic minorities from the home counties, as even being "middle class" ethnic minority you don't get a fair crack. But more should be done for as I said earlier inner city applicants where in some cases it's more than grades and correctly structuring a cv, cover letter. That through no fault of their own they are lacking some of the prerequisites, that interviewees are expecting from candidates i.e. clear communication, confidence. I mean even small things such as wearing an over sized suits, gives a negative impression, something where someone from a socially deprived background can't really address.
Reply 75
Original post by addingishard
do you have any reason to believe that the ethnicity breakdown of the people interested in IB is any different to the ethnicity breakdown of the whole population or are you just saying it for no reason


My point was that 90% of the population being white doesn't mean that 90% of IB applicants will be white. You can't just claim this to be true without some statistical evidence.
Original post by Desmos
My point was that 90% of the population being white doesn't mean that 90% of IB applicants will be white. You can't just claim this to be true without some statistical evidence.
It also doesn't mean 50% will be white.
Original post by thatapanydude
Also let's not forget that applicants who are even "middle class", with top cv's etc are still looked over when compared to applicants from independent schools with worse grades and achievements. This is where Seo does help, in getting these candidates through to final rounds. Personally I think that my best shot is through one of these disadvantaged schemes through Seo, even though I maybe don't really fit the type of candidate their looking for. Which is unfortunately the sad truth for many candidates of ethnic minority.

Which goes back to one of the main problems, once hr or whoever sees a name which is an ethnic minority, they generally have stereotypes in the back of their head, which are often of negative connotations, that even if I invite them to interview they won't perform as well as this other candidate who is "white" etc. This can and will not improve unless their ethnic diversity in their hr recruitment teams, as when looking for candidates they will tend to look for themselves in a person, someone they can relate to (this happens in all walks of life) and if in their back of their mind they can paint a picture of this candidate and relate him to x,y,z who came from this school, this uni and who are top performers within the bank, then they will go for the candidate who most resembles that person.


This exactly. It's not like they actively discriminate but its well documented and researched that people have biases towards people who are similar to them - its psychological. not to mention stereotypes are very real and even if you don't consider yourself racist you still hold them subconsciously (and it has been especially shown that people associate negative stereotypes with black people). i think its probably the biggest reason why minorities struggle to get into oxbridge. if you look at the admissions tutors they are even less diverse than the students. i was looking at the cambs economics department website and i couldn't find a single black staff member! at the end of the day if you have a bunch of white ex-public schoolboys choosing the students then whether they mean to or not they are going to favour the white public schoolboy applicants. combine this with the fact that if you have preconceptions on types of people this will affect how you perceive their performance, a kind of confirmation bias. this is worse at oxbridge where the decisions are made by individual tutors rather than collectively by departments or admissions committees, as no consensus needs to be reached and you have nothing to check your bias. like i honestly believe that (the large majority of) admissions tutors or employers don't intend to be racist in their admissions/employment practices but it doesn't change the fact that that's how it works. I didn't want to mention that middle class minorities are still disadvantaged (relative to middle class whites) bc of the "racism is over" types on this site but... oh and what you said about seeing peoples names reminds me of when people say "but race doesn't appear on the application" or something and I'm just thinking do they really think that if their last name is Malik or if it's Adebayo there are many options?
Original post by ♥Samantha♥
This exactly. It's not like they actively discriminate but its well documented and researched that people have biases towards people who are similar to them - its psychological. not to mention stereotypes are very real and even if you don't consider yourself racist you still hold them subconsciously (and it has been especially shown that people associate negative stereotypes with black people). i think its probably the biggest reason why minorities struggle to get into oxbridge. if you look at the admissions tutors they are even less diverse than the students. i was looking at the cambs economics department website and i couldn't find a single black staff member! at the end of the day if you have a bunch of white ex-public schoolboys choosing the students then whether they mean to or not they are going to favour the white public schoolboy applicants. combine this with the fact that if you have preconceptions on types of people this will affect how you perceive their performance, a kind of confirmation bias. this is worse at oxbridge where the decisions are made by individual tutors rather than collectively by departments or admissions committees, as no consensus needs to be reached and you have nothing to check your bias. like i honestly believe that (the large majority of) admissions tutors or employers don't intend to be racist in their admissions/employment practices but it doesn't change the fact that that's how it works. I didn't want to mention that middle class minorities are still disadvantaged (relative to middle class whites) bc of the "racism is over" types on this site but... oh and what you said about seeing peoples names reminds me of when people say "but race doesn't appear on the application" or something and I'm just thinking do they really think that if their last name is Malik or if it's Adebayo there are many options?
Or it could be that on average minorities happen to come from backgrounds that don't lend well to studying hard and getting the necessary grades for getting in? This isn't unique to minorities, anyone can grow up in undesirable areas, go to crappy schools and up being surrounded by working class kids with no ambition. Growing up in that environment doesn't do much for encouraging you to get good grades or even think about applying to top universities; if your ethnicity accounts for a small proportion of the population and also happens to be associated with that background, do be surprised you don't see many blacks at oxbridge and don't blame it on racism. If anything being a minority is an advantage in investment banking, you only have to look at the spring week/internship classes at certain banks and notice the minority of whites to see which ones are actively using diversity quotas.
Reply 79
Original post by Terry Tibbs
It also doesn't mean 50% will be white.


I never said that it would mean that. I was just pointing out that fallaciousness of the original argument.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending