Original post by Retired_MessiahWoaaahhh let's go boys
1) Well, nah. There's also force of habit through indoctrination by parents (If you believe threads on here, Islam in particular seems very hard to leave once you're in the club). But there are genuinely people who have some form of weird conversion experience or research into whatever religious text and genuinely go "oh boi this is lit". I know a girl that reckons she "felt god in her" while she was in a church once. Not sure how exactly she got from that simple point to deciding Catholicism is the one true religion but I've been too polite to want to ask that so far...
2) I've heard an argument that says something along the lines of omniscience only being knowledge of what's logically possible, and it's apparently not logically possible to know of events that haven't happened yet. Can't remember if there's a bit in the middle of those two points that makes it make more sense or not.
But what I've thought for a while is if you assume god isn't omniscient, he still is sort of omniscient anyway. Standard God traits people quote are as follows: Omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent. Let's say he was just omnipotent and benevolent instead, no given omniscience. If he's all powerful, does he not have the power to give himself any random piece of knowledge he wanted at any time? In that scenario, he'd still know a suitably godlike amount of stuff but could deliberately not bother finding out about what us plebs do in the future and there'd be no contradiction there. Unless I've been dumb and missed something when freestyling that argument.
3) Heavily flawed and violent according to you. Are you God? No. According to the scriptures, who is the man who decides what's moral? God is. So are you wrong as ****? If these violent religious texts are indeed true, then yes you would be wrong as ****. The bible is the godliest, most morally upstanding book in that case, and those theists that go against it are going to hell with you brah. Think there's a bunch of christian theories that say humans tend towards being sinful, which is kindaaa a botched explanation as to why they don't always follow their own rules. Being good is apparently hard or something.
4) Controlling the masses to do what? Pray towards the sky for no apparent reason? Hate on gays even though nobody really wants to do that anymore? Not feeling it. In ye olde times before science yeah, a lot of things christians said to explain stuff turned out to be bs. However, most of what they tried to explain wasn't mentioned in the bible at all so in effect they'd been pulling it right out of their arses instead. But then again if you go reeeeeaaaallly far back ignorance could be an explanation as to how religion came about in the first.
5) Uhhh there's John Hick's soul making theodicy, Plantinga's free will defense... some other ones. Explaining them takes ages. If you don't wanna google them quote me again and I'll parrot a butchered version of what they say in the morning or something...
6) Perhaps he doesn't desire it per se but it's instead some kind of necessity? One thing that's never been made clear in the bible or Quran is God's endgame. He's testing humans, sure. He says we must believe or we burn in hellfire, sure. He tells us what our end point is and what our goal should be, but God's motivations in themselves, what the test is actually for and why he needs to hoard and reward all the good boys is very much up in the air. Maybe he's working towards something and your belief in him is an actual requirement for it to work? A need over a want? Am I making sense? 'cause I've only really just started thinking about it and now I'm lost.
7) A lot of heaven and hell stuff is sort of extrapolated from only a few bible verses. Quran mentions burning in fire every 5 minutes but with christianity it's quite a bit more loose. I've seen people say heaven and hell aren't physical places and that it's just to do with "distance from God", so you're not being directly punished by somebody else but you're so effing far from God right now that you've gone and punished yourself. As for what you think these things should be based on, refer back to my answer to number 3. If God exists, he's the ultimate authority on these things, not you.
8) Does no baptism equal burning forever? Could've sworn it was more complicated than that. I think Plantinga's free will defence comes into this again, sort of. Idea is, all loving god wants to make the best possible people. Best possible people necessarily have to have free will so they can have the choice to do bad things and choose the good. When given this choice, some people are knobs. Extrapolate from there, punishment for the knobs is tough love to warn the other humans to be good, thus producing better people. Maybe. It's a theory.
9) Guess my answer to this is a combination of my answers to 8 and 3? But also God might not be the God of Christianity. Or maybe God just isn't all loving. So what? Dude's showed up and created us, but unfortunately he's a knob. It's possible.
10) Now Jesus miracles aren't my area at all lmao. But in the end if the Quran is right then Jesus is a bit irrelevant. Alternatively Zoroastrianism might be the one true religion and Ahura Mazda is our God. He was believed in before jesus, so in that case we don't need to care. There's probably some botched explanation of Jesus' shenanigans on the internet somewhere but I've never found one I can actually be bothered to look at.
I've done all this and midway through the OP's quoted me, hellish double post is gonna end my life boiks