Okay, so I am really struggling on how to write the argument and not just describe. My title is 'To what extent was the adaptation of Greek religion into Roman religion aggressive?' I have 1000 words of description and I'm struggling with JSTOR and I need to have it done by the end of September. Please help?
My title is a working title given to me by my tutor. I am essentially addressing the differences between ancient Greek and ancient Roman religion. And my argument is that they are different and that Romans didn't 'copy' Greek gods and religion. Also, I forgot to mention it in my initial question but I am doing my EPQ through Edexcel (most people seem to be doing the AQA one)
In a way I guess. Not quite origins because it's hard to find scholars that go back that far and any reliable sources from that long ago. The current set up I have going on is a subtitle of what the thing is and then arguing why it's different. Also, my argument isn't on originality because Roman religion isn't. Technically even the Greeks shared gods with Egyptians and such. My argument is more that the two do not equal each other, that despite the similarities the Romans well, 'Romanised' it and used the Greek influence on their religion differently.
Btw great choice on avatar picture 😉