You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Factorising watch

1. Write as the product of four linear factors.

I understand that I most likely need to make this into a quadratic expression. In this particular instance, though, I cannot find a way to do this. I cannot find a common factor between , and . I have written expressions as the product of three linear factors before, but not four.
2. Notice we have so if we let then we just have a quadratic in y.
Just factorise this as normal and then you should be able to factorise further.
3. (Original post by Illidan2)
Write as the product of four linear factors.

I understand that I most likely need to make this into a quadratic expression. In this particular instance, though, I cannot find a way to do this. I cannot find a common factor between , and . I have written expressions as the product of three linear factors before, but not four.
Because there are no or terms, you can let , then you just have a regular quadratic. Factorise it into two factors, then substitute the back in place of y. Then you should be able to factorise each of those two bits into two factors each by using the difference of two squares method (
4. Thanks. I am quite new to this, so I don't know if i'm on the right track. Unsure of whether I have followed your method correctly so far, I now have two brackets, and . Does that make sense so far? Or have I gone wrong already? If that's correct so far, how do I go about substituting the back in? Would it just be ?
5. (Original post by Illidan2)
Thanks. I am quite new to this, so I don't know if i'm on the right track. Unsure of whether I have followed your method correctly so far, I now have two brackets, and . Does that make sense so far? Or have I gone wrong already? If that's correct so far, how do I go about substituting the back in? Would it just be ?
I'm having trouble seeing how you got that. What do you get when you factorise , first of all?
6. .

7. (Original post by Illidan2)
.

I can't say I've ever seen that method of factorising a quadratic before. , so you've just ended up with and . Also there should still be a in your second line. How would you have factorised a quadratic at GCSE level?
8. (Original post by Illidan2)
.

This looks at an attempt at the AC method but then where has come from?

Or like Sonechka , I may just not be familiar with this method. But you haven't arrived at the correct answer anyway.
9. Yes, that was a mistake. 9 and 4 should have been

I'm unsure as to how I would have done it at GCSE level, it has been over 5 years since I sat my GCSE exams. Until around 2 days ago, I was not sure I had factorised a quadratic since.
10. (Original post by Illidan2)
Yes, that was a mistake. 9 and 4 should have been

I'm unsure as to how I would have done it at GCSE level, it has been over 5 years since I sat my GCSE exams. Until around 2 days ago, I am not sure I had factorised a quadratic since.
It seems likely that you are trying to use the AC method. Try watching this video then have another go.

You'll need to be able to factorise quadratics before you can tackle the question in your OP.
11. Yes, that's exactly right. I'm trying to use the AC method, as it is the only method I know for factorising quadratics, which is what I read in a textbook 2 days ago. I didn't know other methods existed. I'll watch the video, then give it another try, like you said.
12. (Original post by Illidan2)
I didn't know other methods existed. I'll watch the video, then give it another try, like you said.
There are 3 methods that I can think of. Two of them (including the AC method) are taught maybe 50-50 in schools. Most students learn this topic without realising that half the country does it differently

13. I realise now where I went wrong. Now that I managed to factorise that quadratic, I'm not sure how to put the x^2 back in in place of y and complete it.

Edit: I apologise for the errors in my recent posts, I've had to switch to my phone.
14. (Original post by Illidan2)

I realise now where I went wrong. Now that I managed to factorise that quadratic, I'm not sure how to put the x^2 back in in place of y and complete it.

Edit: I apologise for the errors in my recent posts, I've had to switch to my phone.
You've made a sign error; remember c = +9, so you need -1 and -9 in the brackets or you'll end up with -9 or +13 instead of +9 and -13. It's always a good idea to check your factorising by expanding out the brackets again.

You can now write the factorised expression as . What do you notice about and ?
15. Sorry for the delayed reply, I'm at work you see, only just got on break.

As far as I understand it, 1, 4, 9 and are each, individually, linear factors. Seeing as there are four or them, I assume that is the problem written out as a product of four linear factors?

So effectively, as other people in this thread have said, this is just a case of ordinary quadratic factorisation with some additional substitution. I see! It all becomes clear now
16. Suppose I have a similar problem, with but just . What would I do then? Would substitution still work? It seems like it wouldn't be possible to substitute as you can't take x^2 off both sides to convert it to a quadratic.
17. (Original post by Illidan2)
Sorry for the delayed reply, I'm at work you see, only just got on break.

As far as I understand it, 1, 4, 9 and are each, individually, linear factors. Seeing as there are four or them, I assume that is the problem written out as a product of four linear factors?

So effectively, as other people in this thread have said, this is just a case of ordinary quadratic factorisation with some additional substitution. I see! It all becomes clear now
Yes, that is what it is, but you're not quite there. By "four linear factors", the question means "four sets of brackets", essentially.

The next step relies on you noticing a numerical property of 1, 4, 9 and . What do these have in common?

Edit: A problem with and would not come up at A-level.
18. (Original post by Sonechka)
Yes, that is what it is, but you're not quite there. By "four linear factors", the question means "four sets of brackets", essentially.

The next step relies on you noticing a numerical property of 1, 4, 9 and . What do these have in common?

Edit: A problem with and would not come up at A-level.
I realise these are all the results of squaring numbers. 1 squared is 1, 2 squared is 4, 3 squared Is 9.
19. (Original post by Illidan2)
I realise these are all the results of squaring numbers. 1 squared is 1, 2 squared is 4, 3 squared Is 9.
Yes (and is obviously a square number too).

So since you have two sets of brackets entirely made up of square numbers - - what can you do with each set of brackets?
20. Simplify them? (2x-3) (2x-3) (x-1) (x-1)

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 4, 2017
Today on TSR

### Exam Jam 2018

Join thousands of students this half term

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams