You are Here: Home >< Maths

# AP Question HELP! watch

1. The first two terms of an arithmetic progression are 16 and 24. Find the least number of terms of the progression which must be taken for their sum to exceed 20000.
Sol. I got d = 8 from the given information.
Then I substitued the values into the Sum formula.
I got the quadratic eq. n^2+3n-5000=0 (Not sure which sign to use)
Also I how can I solve the eq. to find n? I tried doing factorizing and using quadratic formula but I couldn't get the answer. Please help me out.
The first two terms of an arithmetic progression are 16 and 24. Find the least number of terms of the progression which must be taken for their sum to exceed 20000.
Sol. I got d = 8 from the given information.
Then I subsitued the values into the Sum formula.
I got the quadratic eq. n^2+3n-5000=0 (Not sure which sign to use)
Also I how can I solve the eq. to find n? I tried doing factorizing and quadratic formula but I couldn't get the answer. Please help me out.
Let me see if I remember how to do this...

Whilst solving this I'm rewording the question so it makes more sense for me. I interpret the question as follows, find the smallest value of n for which the sum of is greater than

If you cannot solve that you need to revisit the earlier chapters and do more questions on it. Don't progress onto a further topic until you've mastered the previous
3. (Original post by HelpMe??)
Let me see if I remember how to do this...

Whilst solving this I'm rewording the question so it makes more sense for me. I interpret the question as follows, find the smallest value of n for which the sum of is greater than

If you cannot solve that you need to revisit the earlier chapters and do more questions on it. Don't progress onto a further topic until you've mastered the previous
Oh thats clear. Thank you so much.
Btw as I checked the marking scheme it says 'Correct answer from trial and improvement gets full mark.' So how do we get answer by using that method or there is one method only which is shown above?
Oh thats clear. Thank you so much.
Btw as I checked the marking scheme it says 'Correct answer from trial and improvement gets full mark.' So how do we get answer by using that method or there is one method only which is shown above?
You could use trial and improvement, testing various values of n until you find one that gets the sum to be just below 20000 and one that gets it to be just above. However, the quadratic inequality method is much faster. Simply think of the graph of a quadratic with positive x^2 term. It will be above the x-axis (i.e. the quadratic is > 0) both to the left of the lower root and to the right of the higher root. Now you should be able to find the required conditions on n.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 7, 2017
Today on TSR

### Congratulations to Harry and Meghan!

But did you bother to watch?

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams