Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Hi guys.

    So i didn't have a clue how to approach part b of this question. Having consulted the solution bank i have seen and understand the logic behind their working out.

    However i have a few questions. What if the particle loses contact at a previous point on the chute but then comes back into contact with the chute before R? Would the solution banks method still work?

    Is it safe for me to assume that if there is a reaction at R then the particle never loses contact with the chute?



    Any input is appreciated.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Shaanv)
    Hi guys.

    So i didn't have a clue how to approach part b of this question. Having consulted the solution bank i have seen and understand the logic behind their working out.

    However i have a few questions. What if the particle loses contact at a previous point on the chute but then comes back into contact with the chute before R? Would the solution banks method still work?

    Is it safe for me to assume that if there is a reaction at R then the particle never loses contact with the chute?



    Any input is appreciated.
    An interesting question.

    From the point of view of the given question, you're only interested in whether the particle leaves the surface at all. Doesn't matter whether it comes into contact with the surface again or not.

    And NO, it's not save to assume that as long as there is a reaction at R, then the particle never loses contact.

    The surface is part of a circle in outline. The line followed by the particle once it leaves the surface will be part of a parabola. Whether they will intersect again or not is going to depend on where the particle left the surface, it's velocity, and the curvature of the surface. It might be interesting to investigate....
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    An interesting question.

    From the point of view of the given question, you're only interested in whether the particle leaves the surface at all. Doesn't matter whether it comes into contact with the surface again or not.

    And NO, it's not save to assume that as long as there is a reaction at R, then the particle never loses contact.

    The surface is part of a circle in outline. The line followed by the particle once it leaves the surface will be part of a parabola. Whether they will intersect again or not is going to depend on where the particle left the surface, it's velocity, and the curvature of the surface. It might be interesting to investigate....
    Guess i will have to be extra cautious when approaching a question like this, thanks for the input
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    An interesting question.

    The surface is part of a circle in outline. The line followed by the particle once it leaves the surface will be part of a parabola. Whether they will intersect again or not is going to depend on where the particle left the surface, it's velocity, and the curvature of the surface. It might be interesting to investigate....
    The particle will lose contact with the circle when the component of mg acting towards the centre of rotation is no longer sufficient to maintain circular motion. This component can only reduce further as the particle falls freely under the influence of gravity, due to the changing angle above the horizontal. At the same time, the force needed to maintain circular motion at the original radius would increase with the increasing speed of the particle, so this is a double whammy - more radial force needed but less available. I think this means that once the particle has departed from circular motion is stays departed.

    Turning this round, I also think this also means that if the particle is in contact with the circle at point R, it has not previously departed from circular motion.

    (This is not a mathematical proof by any means, so I'm open to other thoughts).
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    ...
    Nice.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.