# Quadratics : which method to use? Watch

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

I have learned 3 methods of dealing with quadratic expressions.

1: Factorising

2: Quadratic Formula

3: Completing the square

Whilst I can utilise each of these individually, I am not always sure which one to choose. As I understand it, there are situations where some of these methods will work and others will not. How can I recognise which method to use to get the answer I need, without having to use trial and error and end up applying all three if necessary? Is there a means of selection?

1: Factorising

2: Quadratic Formula

3: Completing the square

Whilst I can utilise each of these individually, I am not always sure which one to choose. As I understand it, there are situations where some of these methods will work and others will not. How can I recognise which method to use to get the answer I need, without having to use trial and error and end up applying all three if necessary? Is there a means of selection?

0

reply

Report

#2

Look at your equation, if you can find two numbers that will multiply to make the last number and add the middle number (with the single x), then you can factorise.

If not, you can use either of the two methods. Exam questions may ask for a specific method

Completing the square and the Quadratic formula are very similar, but CtS can be used without a calculator, with the QF, you don't have to use a calculator, but if the number underneath the square root can cancel down, then you could use it without a calculator.

If not, you can use either of the two methods. Exam questions may ask for a specific method

Completing the square and the Quadratic formula are very similar, but CtS can be used without a calculator, with the QF, you don't have to use a calculator, but if the number underneath the square root can cancel down, then you could use it without a calculator.

0

reply

Report

#3

(Original post by

I have learned 3 methods of dealing with quadratic expressions.

1: Factorising

2: Quadratic Formula

3: Completing the square

Whilst I can utilise each of these individually, I am not always sure which one to choose. As I understand it, there are situations where some of these methods will work and others will not. How can I recognise which method to use to get the answer I need, without having to use trial and error and end up applying all three if necessary? Is there a means of selection?

**Illidan2**)I have learned 3 methods of dealing with quadratic expressions.

1: Factorising

2: Quadratic Formula

3: Completing the square

Whilst I can utilise each of these individually, I am not always sure which one to choose. As I understand it, there are situations where some of these methods will work and others will not. How can I recognise which method to use to get the answer I need, without having to use trial and error and end up applying all three if necessary? Is there a means of selection?

Personally I avoid completing the square and most students do. Always try factorising first but don't spend too long on it if you really can't see it. Use the quadratic formula if you can't factorise it. If you like you can check that is a square number - if it is then the quadratic factorises. But finding is one of the steps to using the quadratic formula so you could argue that you may as well just use the formula in this case

Also there could be a hint in the question e.g. if the question asks for an answer to 2 d.p. or in surd form then the quadratic formula is the way to go. Are you doing GCSEs?

0

reply

Report

#4

**Illidan2**)

I have learned 3 methods of dealing with quadratic expressions.

1: Factorising

2: Quadratic Formula

3: Completing the square

Whilst I can utilise each of these individually, I am not always sure which one to choose. As I understand it, there are situations where some of these methods will work and others will not. How can I recognise which method to use to get the answer I need, without having to use trial and error and end up applying all three if necessary? Is there a means of selection?

0

reply

Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form.

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

0

reply

Report

#6

(Original post by

Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form

**Illidan2**)Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form.

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

**Illidan2**)Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form.

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

0

reply

Report

#8

Sorry to be contrary to some of the advice given on here, but I would

In fact, if you've never seen it before, I recommend looking up the derivation of the quadratic formula - it is just completing the square for ax^2 + bx + c = 0 !!!!

I know it sounds weird to

ie for (x - p)^2 + q = 0, the vertex (min in this case) is at (p,q).

Being a mathmo though I think I just prefer the fact that is feels far more elegant and pure than just plugging values into a formula.

With that said though I'd always check to see if it can be factorised first. However if I can't see a solution quickly I'll just crack on with completing the square...

*always*try completing the square before using the formula. The main reason why is because the formula is just the general case of completing the square anyway. When you use the formula all you are doing is skipping steps that you would have taken in order to complete the square.In fact, if you've never seen it before, I recommend looking up the derivation of the quadratic formula - it is just completing the square for ax^2 + bx + c = 0 !!!!

I know it sounds weird to

*want*to take further steps, but it means errors are potentially less likely, and also in the completed square form the equation can tell you some useful information.ie for (x - p)^2 + q = 0, the vertex (min in this case) is at (p,q).

Being a mathmo though I think I just prefer the fact that is feels far more elegant and pure than just plugging values into a formula.

With that said though I'd always check to see if it can be factorised first. However if I can't see a solution quickly I'll just crack on with completing the square...

0

reply

Report

#9

**Illidan2**)

Oh okay, I see Suppose I want to obtain the roots of a function f(x). I know for a fact that I can do this via factorisation, but would the quadratic formula/completing the square work in this situation? Each method appears to yield the answer in a different form.

Also- why do students avoid completing the square? Is is it suboptimal in the sense that it requires more time to calculate the solution?

You should, unless the question specifies otherwise, always give your answer in terms of surds, and so completing the square is preferred to using the formula, although you could always use the formula and simplify until you have the answer (see my previous post - this is exactly the same as completing the square).

All quadratics that have solutions factorise, but not all of them have nice factorisations. Generally, if you can factorise it easily you should, since the formula and CTS will give you the same answers anyhow. If you can't factorise it easily then try CTS or simplifying the formula by hand to get an exact answer with surds.

0

reply

Report

#10

(Original post by

I know it sounds weird to

**HeadmasterCid**)I know it sounds weird to

*want*to take further steps, but it means errors are potentially less likely, and also in the completed square form the equation can tell you some useful information.By the way I'm definitely not saying students shouldn't use completing the square to solve quadratics. With practice it's just as good as using the formula (I realise that both methods are technically the same ).

0

reply

(Original post by

Assuming you're not told which method to use:

Personally I avoid completing the square and most students do. Always try factorising first but don't spend too long on it if you really can't see it. Use the quadratic formula if you can't factorise it. If you like you can check that is a square number - if it is then the quadratic factorises. But finding is one of the steps to using the quadratic formula so you could argue that you may as well just use the formula in this case

Also there could be a hint in the question e.g. if the question asks for an answer to 2 d.p. or in surd form then the quadratic formula is the way to go. Are you doing GCSEs?

**Notnek**)Assuming you're not told which method to use:

Personally I avoid completing the square and most students do. Always try factorising first but don't spend too long on it if you really can't see it. Use the quadratic formula if you can't factorise it. If you like you can check that is a square number - if it is then the quadratic factorises. But finding is one of the steps to using the quadratic formula so you could argue that you may as well just use the formula in this case

Also there could be a hint in the question e.g. if the question asks for an answer to 2 d.p. or in surd form then the quadratic formula is the way to go. Are you doing GCSEs?

0

reply

Report

#12

(Original post by

I'm not sure why you think errors would be less likely when using completing the square? I would think the opposite might be true for GCSE students.

By the way I'm definitely not saying students shouldn't use completing the square to solve quadratics. With practice it's just as good as using the formula (I realise that both methods are technically the same ).

**Notnek**)I'm not sure why you think errors would be less likely when using completing the square? I would think the opposite might be true for GCSE students.

By the way I'm definitely not saying students shouldn't use completing the square to solve quadratics. With practice it's just as good as using the formula (I realise that both methods are technically the same ).

For me, plugging numbers into a formula makes errors likely. Whereas actually going through the steps (as you do with CTS) will make errors much less likely. But I understand that for others (particularly going back down to GCSE or below) adding in further steps gives a greater chance of error.

It obviously depends on the person, but for those seeking mathematical enlightenment I would recommend CTS over the formula any day! (Meme not my own)

0

reply

I didn't know the quadratic formula was part of the GCSE spec. I don't remember it, and this is all new to me, you see. I remember factorisation, but not CTS or the Quadratic Formula. I thought they were introduced at A-Level. This is somewhat discouraging :P I do hope I'll be able to cope as the material progresses.

0

reply

Report

#14

(Original post by

I am self-teaching myself the new Edexcel a-level maths spec(2017). It has been over five years since I studied GCSE maths. I do not have a teacher, only myself, a textbook, and TSR. The textbook implies that for a function f(x), to draw a quadratic graph I need the roots of the function for the x coordinates, and with (-p, q) as my turning point. The textbook tells me to complete the square to get the turning point. When I was referring to the answer in different forms I was referring to things such as precisely this, as I only find that my answer is in this form when I complete the square, and that the roots of the function only seem apparent to me when I factorise etc.

**Illidan2**)I am self-teaching myself the new Edexcel a-level maths spec(2017). It has been over five years since I studied GCSE maths. I do not have a teacher, only myself, a textbook, and TSR. The textbook implies that for a function f(x), to draw a quadratic graph I need the roots of the function for the x coordinates, and with (-p, q) as my turning point. The textbook tells me to complete the square to get the turning point. When I was referring to the answer in different forms I was referring to things such as precisely this, as I only find that my answer is in this form when I complete the square, and that the roots of the function only seem apparent to me when I factorise etc.

Also you could factorise or use the formula and find the x value of the T.P. by averaging the x values of the roots. Then plug this in to find y. Not very elegant though

0

reply

Report

#15

**Illidan2**)

I am self-teaching myself the new Edexcel a-level maths spec(2017). It has been over five years since I studied GCSE maths. I do not have a teacher, only myself, a textbook, and TSR. The textbook implies that for a function f(x), to draw a quadratic graph I need the roots of the function for the x coordinates, and with (-p, q) as my turning point. The textbook tells me to complete the square to get the turning point. When I was referring to the answer in different forms I was referring to things such as precisely this, as I only find that my answer is in this form when I complete the square, and that the roots of the function only seem apparent to me when I factorise etc.

By the way, please continue to post questions on TSR whenever you are stuck - self-teaching can be hard without a teacher. And I recommend watching ExamSolutions videos if you're not already.

0

reply

Report

#16

(Original post by

I didn't know the quadratic formula was part of the GCSE spec. I don't remember it, and this is all new to me, you see. I remember factorisation, but not CTS or the Quadratic Formula. I thought they were introduced at A-Level. This is somewhat discouraging :P I do hope I'll be able to cope as the material progresses.

**Illidan2**)I didn't know the quadratic formula was part of the GCSE spec. I don't remember it, and this is all new to me, you see. I remember factorisation, but not CTS or the Quadratic Formula. I thought they were introduced at A-Level. This is somewhat discouraging :P I do hope I'll be able to cope as the material progresses.

0

reply

Report

#17

(Original post by

Some GCSE syllabi include CTS, I think. I'm fairly sure all include the quadratic formula. That way there is always a fail-safe if they can't factorise.

**HeadmasterCid**)Some GCSE syllabi include CTS, I think. I'm fairly sure all include the quadratic formula. That way there is always a fail-safe if they can't factorise.

1

reply

Report

#18

(Original post by

The content is the same across all exam boards and they all include CTS and have done since I can remember. And nowadays they include harder questions where the leading coefficient is greater than 1 - this was only part of A Level a few years ago.

**Notnek**)The content is the same across all exam boards and they all include CTS and have done since I can remember. And nowadays they include harder questions where the leading coefficient is greater than 1 - this was only part of A Level a few years ago.

Well, I think it is good that CTS is being rolled out at GCSE, down with the quadratic formula!

0

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top