Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChickenMadness)
    yes. Can't really argue with evidence like this.

    I'm sure they were once lovely people before they were sadly infected by feminism A terrible disease.



    LilBlonde
    Are you trolling or what? If you think the majority of feminists act like this then I'm sorry but your sadly mistaken. As for genuine feminism it isn't a terrible disease to advocate equality for all genders. You are very narrow minded pal
    • Political Ambassador
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Sh*** faker than the porn adverts saying m*lfs want to f*** near my area
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sparks17)
    gathering data for coursework, but I think its interesting to discuss this anyway. what do you guys think of feminism?

    discuss.
    I think because there isnt a sole leader of the concept and movement of feminism different people have different opinions about the direction it should take. So even feminists don't always agree but learn to respect eachothers opinions.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    Insensitive to whom, Ms Victim?
    Someone got offended?! *gasp* It must be so hard for you?1! How dare that girl get offended to a joke about an issue that has affected her and her family and has no relation to me whatsoever; when I could've avoided looking like an idiot by letting her express her feelings because she's allowed to!

    Not today libtards, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

    D u d e. First, calm down; secondly, how does this affect you? Finally, have some Snickers. You're not you when you're hungry 👌
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    Someone got offended?! *gasp* It must be so hard for you?1! How dare that girl get offended to a joke about an issue that has affected her and her family and has no relation to me whatsoever; when I could've avoided looking like an idiot by letting her express her feelings because she's allowed to!

    Not today libtards, REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!

    D u d e. First, calm down; secondly, how does this affect you? Finally, have some Snickers. You're not you when you're hungry 👌
    And so what if she is offended?
    Online

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ChickenMadness)
    yes. Can't really argue with evidence like this.

    I'm sure they were once lovely people before they were sadly infected by feminism A terrible disease.



    LilBlonde
    .Hats off to you for sharing the video bro. The video completely shows what modern feminism has become.These feminists cry about equality but actually want their gender to be the superior one.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    And so what if she is offended?
    Then don't point it out, lmao. We can all read, we all know that she's offended. Why do you have to go out of your way to make drama out of it?

    It's unnecessary 👌
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    Then don't point it out, lmao. We can all read, we all know that she's offended. Why do you have to go out of your way to make drama out of it?

    It's unnecessary 👌
    Why does she think she is justified to be offended? And why does she think her offendendness matters?

    It has become a Western, liberanazi-promoted culture to think claiming or obtaining victimhood is a platform to bully others and suppress their views. And this is another example of such case. So one needs to ask her "And so what if you are offended?".

    The guy made a statement of simple hyperbole.

    Facts:
    1) He had no intention of disparaging or even referring to those that have cancer.

    2) His statement does not belittle cancer.

    3) He does not have any knowledge of her, or anyone close to her, ever having cancer.

    4) She does not have cancer.

    But despite these facts, she saw it as an opportunity to be the "poor, abused, defenceless and offended victim" so she can intimidate him against his point.

    She is demonstrating the triats of liberanazi farcist bullies who suppress or censor views by claiming feelings are hurt, irrespective of if facts are being stated. That is wrong and should be challenged. Society should not stand for that crap!
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    Why does she think she is justified to be offended? And why does she think her offendendness matters?

    It has become a Western, liberanazi-promoted culture to think claiming or obtaining victimhood is a platform to bully others and suppress their views. And this is another example of such case. So one needs to ask her "And so what if you are offended?".

    The guy made a statement of simple hyperbole.

    Facts:
    1) He had no intention of disparaging or even referring to those that have cancer.

    2) His statement does not belittle cancer.

    3) He does not have any knowledge of her, or anyone close to her, ever having cancer.

    4) She does not have cancer.

    But despite these facts, she saw it as an opportunity to be the "poor, abused, defenceless and offended victim" so she can intimidate him against his point.

    She is demonstrating the triats of liberanazi farcist bullies who suppress or censor views by claiming feelings are hurt, irrespective of if facts are being stated. That is wrong and should be challenged. Society should not stand for that crap!
    Jesus christ, you're one of those guys. Where did she say that she wanted censorship? She was just saying that what the guy said hurt her? is that so much of a hard concept to grasp?

    The fact that you started insulting her because she has expressed a feeling, makes me think that you're a literal idiot. Does it matter? She's not screeching around like some tumblr radfems; she's not screaming into your face "DON'T SAY THAT, YOU'RE OPPRESSING ME!". You could've just ignored her statement. But no, y'all gotta grasp at the straws.

    Hey guys! Expressing dislike to a statement is now a sign of victimhood! Call your local conservative now to see why expressing negative emotions to a statement is bad to society!!11!1 Sign up now, and get your free "Libernazi farcist bullies" t-shirt today! 👌
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    Jesus christ, you're one of those guys. Where did she say that she wanted censorship? She was just saying that what the guy said hurt her? is that so much of a hard concept to grasp?

    The fact that you started insulting her because she has expressed a feeling, makes me think that you're a literal idiot. Does it matter? She's not screeching around like some tumblr radfems; she's not screaming into your face "DON'T SAY THAT, YOU'RE OPPRESSING ME!". You could've just ignored her statement. But no, y'all gotta grasp at the straws.

    Hey guys! Expressing dislike to a statement is now a sign of victimhood! Call your local conservative now to see why expressing negative emotions to a statement is bad to society!!11!1 Sign up now, and get your free "Libernazi farcist bullies" t-shirt today! 👌
    Please point out where I said she said she wanted censorship. Also point out where I insulted her.

    Your ability to perform these two tasks would point out who is the literal idiot.

    Please go ahead.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    Please point out where I said she said she wanted censorship. Also point out where I insulted her.

    Your ability to perform these two tasks would point out who is the literal idiot.

    Please go ahead.
    I don't know about you, but if someone compared me "liberanazi farcist bullies" I would consider that as an insult. Who knows, she might not even be a liberal herself?

    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    She is demonstrating the triats of liberanazi farcist bullies who suppress or censor views by claiming feelings are hurt, irrespective of if facts are being stated. That is wrong and should be challenged. Society should not stand for that crap!
    I mean, in this context she was hurt from something someone has said and you did compare it to the liberals who "censor views". Suggesting that she also wants the censorship of opposing views.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But you do you.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    I don't know about you, but if someone compared me "liberanazi farcist bullies" I would consider that as an insult. Who knows, she might not even be a liberal herself?



    I mean, in this context she was hurt from something someone has said and you did compare it to the liberals who "censor views". Suggesting that she also wants the censorship of opposing views.
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ But you do you.
    So, out of the two of us, I am not the literal idiot them.

    Comparing someone to the traits and approach they exhibit and utilise is not an insult, it is an exposure.

    As a matter of fact, SHE is the one that has insulted me and threatened me with physical harm. But liberanazis like you wouldn't have noticed that, you prefer to interpret my argument as the insult and she is my victim.

    Reminds me of this case of whem Ben Shapiro was physically assaulted & threatened in a debate, but all the present liberanazis that witnessed it felt his refusal to see and label a transgender the sex they wish (their non-biological one) is actually the one and only "outrageous" offence.



    She has not ask for censorship, but that is normally the ultimate outcome and tool of those that always claim to be "offended" or take "offence". The frontline attack approach they first exhibit is to play the "victim" and attempt to shame the person by portraying them as lacking humanity. Normally this is just a tactic engaged in because they lack logical arguments to win in the debate, so they go for "feelings over facts". Exactly what she was doing.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RoyalBeams)
    So, out of the two of us, I am not the literal idiot them.

    Comparing someone to the traits and approach they exhibit and utilise is not an insult, it is an exposure.

    As a matter of fact, SHE is the one that has insulted me and threatened me with physical harm. But liberanazis like you wouldn't have noticed that, you prefer to interpret my argument as the insult and she is my victim.

    Reminds me of this case of whem Ben Shapiro was physically assaulted & threatened in a debate, but all the present liberanazis that witnessed it felt his refusal to see and label a transgender the sex they wish (their non-biological one) is actually the one and only "outrageous" offence.



    She has not ask for censorship, but that is normally the ultimate outcome and tool of those that always claim to be "offended" or take "offence". The frontline attack approach they first exhibit is to play the "victim" and attempt to shame the person by portraying them as lacking humanity. Normally this is just a tactic engaged in because they lack logical arguments to win in the debate, so they go for "feelings over facts". Exactly what she was doing.
    HOLY cRAP DUDE! I'm laughing, when did she threaten you!? I've looked back in this thread and I have not seen an ounce of threats to you at all. I'm not even a liberal, holy crap 😂

    Listen man, you've given me a good chuckle tonight.

    Anyways! as for your lovelyvideo, from what I conclude (I watched all of it just so you won't get your jimmies rustled)
    1. They're both in the wrong. Both of them acted immature to the situation
    2. Zoe shouldn't have threatened him like that and don't condone violence as such. However,Shapiro was also being quite rude with his constant use of "mental illness" to describe transgenderism, when he could've addressed it in a different way; I mean if you're going to debate with someone, at least don't belittle them, jfc.
    3. This was a political and professional discussion. Both sides should be allowed to state what they believe. But for a political discussion, this was a mess. Everyone was interrupting each other and hurling out insults and stuff. It wasn't even a discussion. Just constant babbles.

    I mean, it's as if all of a sudden feeling dislike or having opposing views to a situation is indication of victimhood.

    @/27FT only said one sentence of her feelings and you're already jumping down her throat. Cancer on itself is a sensitive issue, as it is a massive killer. So is no one allowed to feel sensitive towards it? I'm not saying that people are not allowed to talk about it, but the guy could've at least said sorry and moved on. It's definitely not a sign of victimhood. It's not as if she's saying "woe is me! this guy should go to prison for this!"; it's more like a "hey dude, can you not say that?".

    Anyways, I've said my words ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    HOLY cRAP DUDE! I'm laughing, when did she threaten you!? I've looked back in this thread and I have not seen an ounce of threats to you at all. I'm not even a liberal, holy crap 😂

    Listen man, you've given me a good chuckle tonight.
    I will be nice and give you a pass on this one.

    You can't see it because it has been removed by a moderator, so I will play fair and let you of on this.

    Now go to my post #120 and see it as I luckily quoted it before the moderator removed it.

    Now wipe that smile of your face as the laugh is on you.

    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    Anyways! as for your lovelyvideo, from what I conclude (I watched all of it just so you won't get your jimmies rustled)
    1. They're both in the wrong. Both of them acted immature to the situation
    2. Zoe shouldn't have threatened him like that and don't condone violence as such. However,Shapiro was also being quite rude with his constant use of "mental illness" to describe transgenderism, when he could've addressed it in a different way; I mean if you're going to debate with someone, at least don't belittle them, jfc.
    3. This was a political and professional discussion. Both sides should be allowed to state what they believe. But for a political discussion, this was a mess. Everyone was interrupting each other and hurling out insults and stuff. It wasn't even a discussion. Just constant babbles.
    Despite you babbling, my point still stands.

    The liberals there only focused on one party's 'wrong' based on "offense", while the other party got physical because he was freely stating what he believed, and that was not condemned one iota.

    Make sure you don't laugh and giggle about this too because I am right again.

    (Original post by Fluffybunneh)
    I mean, it's as if all of a sudden feeling dislike or having opposing views to a situation is indication of victimhood.

    @/27FT only said one sentence of her feelings and you're already jumping down her throat. Cancer on itself is a sensitive issue, as it is a massive killer. So is no one allowed to feel sensitive towards it? I'm not saying that people are not allowed to talk about it, but the guy could've at least said sorry and moved on. It's definitely not a sign of victimhood. It's not as if she's saying "woe is me! this guy should go to prison for this!"; it's more like a "hey dude, can you not say that?".

    Anyways, I've said my words ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
    Nonsense!

    What is there to dislike about what he said?

    He should say sorry for what?
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Another example of bullying by "being offended/a victim".

    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Feminism is a necessity.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Georgiaa2911)
    Feminism is a necessity.
    Feminism is now a hate movement.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.