Turn on thread page Beta
    • TSR Community Team
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    TSR Community Team
    New fingerprint technology has been develop by the team at Sheffield Hallam University and can show if a suspect has handled drugs, a condom or even the type of hair gel they use!

    The technique uses a form of mass spectrometry and can show traces of food, alcohol and drugs, according to researchers.

    The Home Office has said that this technology could be used in casework in a matter of months, so a big well done the team at SHU!

    You can read more on the story here.

    What do you make of this? Do you find this kind of technology exciting? What kind of things would they find on your finger prints? (Mine would be crisps)
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Jokes on them I don't use condoms
    • TSR Community Team
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    TSR Community Team
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    ...They already likely know all that (and much more) from suspects' digital fingerprint (although they here is the NSA/GCHQ rather than the police, so perhaps the police investigators don't have access to it).

    Interesting nonetheless.
    I see what you're saying but this feels like the added bonus "It has also successfully detected blood in a 30-year-old fingerprint – meaning it could lead to a breakthrough in a long-closed case".

    From what I've read it hasn't been used by police or the courts but now they're looking to integrate this into cases.
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    There is no proof that finger prints are unique, in fact the evidence is quite to the contrary. We need to stop investing money into a non-exact science and develop new investigative techniques.
    • TSR Support Team
    • Peer Support Volunteers
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    TSR Support Team
    Peer Support Volunteers
    I was just in a tutorial focusing on biometrics, fingerprints and DNA there now. :lol:

    Aw, Britain does love its new technology for catching criminals.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Why would they even need to know what kind of condoms the perp's been using, have they been finding used condoms at the scenes of crimes?
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by (づ ̄ ³ ̄)づ)
    Why would they even need to know what kind of condoms the perp's been using, have they been finding used condoms at the scenes of crimes?
    Relevant question, I haven't heard of many rapes where the rapist has rubbered up first.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SomeWelshGuy123)
    We need to stop investing money into a non-exact science and develop new investigative techniques.
    You mean like extracting DNA and chemical samples from the fingerprint?
    :rolleyes:
    • Political Ambassador
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Good bloke)
    You mean like extracting DNA and chemical samples from the fingerprint?
    :rolleyes:
    DNA evidence is highly flawed too, eg a span of murders five years ago in the US, around 30 murder scenes had the same dna. Turns out it was a woman from the cotton swab factory who had contaminated the swabs.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SomeWelshGuy123)
    DNA evidence is highly flawed too,

    Highly flawed, because you can name one problem, that did not lead to a false conviction, out of hundreds of thousands or even millions? Perhaps you prefer eyewitness testimony, the most notoriously unreliable type of evidence of all?
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    ...They already likely know all that (and much more) from suspects' digital fingerprint (although they here is the NSA/GCHQ rather than the police, so perhaps the police investigators don't have access to it).

    Interesting nonetheless.
    Were you at the Binney/Arjen talk yesterday, by any chance...? :P
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mathemagicien)
    Nope, I was busy rediscovering how bad I am at badminton.

    Sounds like it was a good talk though. Did you go?
    I did, it was excellent. I hadn't realised how badly we're all screwed and how bad national security around the globe is.

    Are you in Methods right now?
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: October 13, 2017
Poll
Favourite type of bread
Useful resources

Quick Link:

Unanswered Life Sciences Threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.